Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-30-2019, 03:43 PM   #701
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
Playoff performance can be taken as a learning experience. The team didn't play the way they did most of the year, and seemed to think they'd be able to coast through the first round, much like Tampa. It's not like that was the best they had to give and won't improve.
And if they don’t?
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2019, 03:44 PM   #702
Mike F
Franchise Player
 
Mike F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Djibouti
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Where, in anything i posted, did you glean that information?
The conversation was about acquiring Kadri, and specifically my argument that the Flames need a winger and not a 3rd centre, and you posted about converting a centre to a winger. The logical inference is that you were talking about Kadri.

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
He immediately becomes the #2 C.

Lindholm stays on the right side with Monahan, Backlund centers the 3rd line, Jankowski can play wind and Ryan stays in the middle on the 4th or lines up on his strong side wing to take faceoffs on that side.

No need to pidgeon hole players just because they are C's...but as stated, its way easier to move from C to wing when needed (Bennett) than it is to move a winger to C because the defensive responsibilities are entirely different.
So you address the lack of scoring depth on RW by moving Jankowski there? Not nearly good enough, and I don't see the Flames dipping into the free agent pool again to address that problem.
Mike F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2019, 03:53 PM   #703
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

I think both sides are true.

The Flames were a top team last year and don’t need to be blown up.

The way they bowed out was very concerning and calls for change.

The future is bright, the assets are many. A core player could be dealt and it doesn’t have to signal a rebuild. The core players are incredibly young. The window has just opened. But a startling lack of grit, heart, speed and urgency was shown in the playoffs and perhaps the roster needs a shakeup somehow.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2019, 04:00 PM   #704
CanadaMatt
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Nothing about how the Flames played last year in the regular season would suggest that they "overachieved." They were a top team by almost every meaningful metric, but for a power play that suddenly dried up in February. Five games of playoff hockey in April is an extremely limited sample size from which to draw conclusions and to make projections.
I wouldnt be so quick to dismiss folks concerns. The data you use to determine whether or not the flames overachieved might not be the same data they are using.

For example, some arguments could be that
- the team played a large chunk of their games against an extremely poor pacific division, a division that’s probably going to improve in 19/20.
- the team had a relatively good run with injuries
- the team had a few players with career years, such as Lindholm
- the teams best player is getting to an age where ‘things start slowing down ’
- the team will likely be without Frolik, who some people think is quite important to the structure of the team
- the team will not be able to add any high end players due to cap concerns

For the record, I don’t agree with these arguments, but it’s interesting to hear where some fans anxiety is coming from and it’s not unreasonable

There are probably (certainly) as many arguments to the contrary.

Last edited by CanadaMatt; 06-30-2019 at 04:11 PM.
CanadaMatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2019, 04:23 PM   #705
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Frank Seravalli @frank_seravalli
Sounds like Calvin Pickard is joining the #RedWings on a two-year deal. He's expected to compete with Jonathan Bernier in training camp to back up Jimmy Howard.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2019, 05:00 PM   #706
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
It doesn’t appear as though Artemi Panarin and Sergei Bobrovsky will be signed as a set. Signs point toward Bobrovsky ending up in FLA while NYI appear the favourite to land Panarin. Both players are repped by the same agent, Paul Theofanous.

Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
But wouldn’t it be something if Panarin and goaltender Semyon Varlamov, who is also represented by Theofanous, ended up as a set with the Isles? If that were to happen, it would mean Robin Lehner would be looking for a home that isn’t NYI or FLA.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2019, 05:04 PM   #707
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Andy Strickland @andystrickland
Apparently the #Isles haven't been willing to give Robin Lehner the term he seeking.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2019, 05:05 PM   #708
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Bob Stauffer @Bob_Stauffer
Don’t be surprised if Brett Connolly represented by Gerry Johansson ends up in Florida possibly on a 4-year term
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2019, 05:18 PM   #709
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Wow good for him if true.

Adrian Dater @adater
Source: Kenny Agostino to sign two-year, one-way deal with Leafs
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2019, 05:27 PM   #710
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Wow good for him if true.

Adrian Dater @adater
Source: Kenny Agostino to sign two-year, one-way deal with Leafs

Sounds like these AHL All Star/NHL Tweener types (Gilmour, Lazar, etc.) are getting cheap one-way deals and squeezing out the slightly higher salary demands from the likes of a Garnet Hathaway and other established NHL journeymen.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2019, 05:30 PM   #711
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
No it does not. A lot of folks acting like this is the end of the process. No, it's the next step. So many good teams struggle in the playoffs and then finally apex at the right time. See: Washington, Chicago, L.A, San Jose, St.Louis.



Our window literally just opened.


Not all.

Once Chicago made the playoffs, they won two rounds the 1st year, then next year they won the Cup.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2019, 05:33 PM   #712
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Sounds like these AHL All Star/NHL Tweener types (Gilmour, Lazar, etc.) are getting cheap one-way deals and squeezing out the slightly higher salary demands from the likes of a Garnet Hathaway and other established NHL journeymen.
Eh... maybe.

But teams giving 1 way deals to tweeners is more about them flexing their bigger budgets over small market teams. They get first choice of the tweeners because they can afford to pay NHL salaries and not counting against the cap in the minors while smaller market teams struggle to give that much money for depth.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2019, 05:35 PM   #713
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Eh... maybe.

But teams giving 1 way deals to tweeners is more about them flexing their bigger budgets over small market teams. They get first choice of the tweeners because they can afford to pay NHL salaries and not counting against the cap in the minors while smaller market teams struggle to give that much money for depth.
Interesting. I assume there's no salary cap in the AHL then?
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2019, 05:36 PM   #714
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Interesting. I assume there's no salary cap in the AHL then?
no salary cap or roster limits in the AHL.

The ECHL does have a salary cap though
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2019, 05:39 PM   #715
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
no salary cap or roster limits in the AHL.
Just minimum salary as per collective agreement.

I recall in years past some Chicago Wolves teams would have a pile of vets on AHL-only deals who made a lot of dough (relatively speaking).
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2019, 05:39 PM   #716
CaptainYooh
Franchise Player
 
CaptainYooh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

If swapping Smith for Talbot would be all Treliving's gonna do tomorrow, I'd be a little pissed...
__________________
"An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking. To generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
“To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake
CaptainYooh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2019, 05:42 PM   #717
tkflames
First Line Centre
 
tkflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh View Post
If swapping Smith for Talbot would be all Treliving's gonna do tomorrow, I'd be a little pissed...
Given the numbers I have seen for guys like Hayes and Zuccarello...I would be quite happy with that. Do nothing and wait to see if there is any value available on July 2/3.
__________________
Go Flames Go
tkflames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tkflames For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2019, 05:44 PM   #718
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh View Post
If swapping Smith for Talbot would be all Treliving's gonna do tomorrow, I'd be a little pissed...
Would you rather he sign some bad deals?
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2019, 05:46 PM   #719
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Yeah I'm more than happy to let the big pieces fall, see what's left on July 2nd and get some better deals. We don't need to go big game hunting, a middle 6 forward or two is all we need.
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2019, 05:49 PM   #720
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Pierre LeBrun @PierreVLeBrun
With Varlamov potentially going to the Islanders, hearing that Carolina focusing its efforts on Mrazek and Lehner ....
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy