Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-20-2019, 05:57 PM   #21
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

You guys are both overblowing the significance of them using the medical term and somehow underselling the symptoms of the condition.

Yeah, his back hurts, due to symptoms of degenerative disc disease. Everyone’s back deteriorates. Not everyone has to retire at 34 because of adverse symptoms of the deterioration.

Just like not everyone needs surgery to replace a disc because of DDD symptoms, but some do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler View Post
Yes, every 34 year-old is walking around with it - it's called aging.
Then why aren’t the stats 100% of people in their 30s showing signs degenerative disc disease instead of 30-50%? Why does it affect some people enough to completely disrupt their daily lives and others don’t even notice it?

Casually brushing it off as “everyone has it” isn’t just wrong, it completely ignores the variety of symptoms and severity.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 06:03 PM   #22
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Didn’t he just participate in the playoffs last month?
SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 06:13 PM   #23
Redrum
First Line Centre
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Casually brushing it off as “everyone has it” isn’t just wrong, it completely ignores the variety of symptoms and severity.
Well it sure seems like everyone whose team is in cap trouble has it, or something like it. I get defending it after a couple times, but after it happens about a dozen perfectly convenient times in a row...
Redrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 06:23 PM   #24
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum View Post
Well it sure seems like everyone whose team is in cap trouble has it, or something like it. I get defending it after a couple times, but after it happens about a dozen perfectly convenient times in a row...
Except it happens to a bunch of players where there’s no “convenient” circumstance, so nobody bothers connecting them together.

Clayton Stoner and Joffrey Lupul immediately come to mind. Players who are out, for some reason or some severity, but certainly aren’t in some debilitating state, are they?

It’s worth noting that it’s the NHL that decides who is valid to go on LTIR. If a player can play, they play. What reason does the NHL have to bail teams out?

Last edited by PepsiFree; 06-20-2019 at 06:28 PM.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 06:31 PM   #25
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

Maybe they meant HHH suplexed him?
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 06:36 PM   #26
Redrum
First Line Centre
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Except it happens to a bunch of players where there’s no “convenient” circumstance, so nobody bothers connecting them together.

Clayton Stoner and Joffrey Lupul immediately come to mind. Players who are out, for some reason or some severity, but certainly aren’t in some debilitating state, are they?

It’s worth noting that it’s the NHL that decides who is valid to go on LTIR. If a player can play, they play. What reason does the NHL have to bail teams out?
Well there you go, it's okay to defend the odd one. Even though they both fit easily into that convenient category. Lupul was useless with a ridiculous contract and Stoner was an obvious buyout candidate.

I'm not saying those two, or anyone in particular is a big fat cheater, but some of them certainly are.
Redrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 06:37 PM   #27
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

As mentioned on HF the correct term for Callahan's issue is Degenerative Cap Disorder. I'm still waiting for a player that's still playing well up to his contract value to have to quit playing due to one of these weird disorders. Seems to only happen to players teams are trying to rid themselves of or the Hossa situation where he didn't want to play for the last years of his deal that didn't pay him much. I guess it's too bad for the Leafs that Marleau still wants to play.

Last edited by Erick Estrada; 06-20-2019 at 06:41 PM.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2019, 08:06 PM   #28
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

While not exactly playing up to his contract value, Cody Hodgson fits the rest of your criteria.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2019, 08:56 PM   #29
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
As mentioned on HF the correct term for Callahan's issue is Degenerative Cap Disorder. I'm still waiting for a player that's still playing well up to his contract value to have to quit playing due to one of these weird disorders. Seems to only happen to players teams are trying to rid themselves of or the Hossa situation where he didn't want to play for the last years of his deal that didn't pay him much. I guess it's too bad for the Leafs that Marleau still wants to play.
You don’t think Callahan would have gotten a NHL contract after this year?

Why would he give up his career to help TB cap situation ?
Jason14h is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2019, 09:08 PM   #30
mikeecho
Powerplay Quarterback
 
mikeecho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LGA View Post
So...he has a back and is older than a toddler? DDD (or degenerative disc/back disease) is basically a nothing diagnosis. It just means that there are degenerative changes observed under diagnostic imaging which, surprise, every poster on here probably has.
I got that same diagnosis last fall. On a scale of 1-10, my back pain tops out at 2 a few days a month. Otherwise, I have no issues at all.
mikeecho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2019, 10:06 AM   #31
badradio
First Line Centre
 
badradio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burnitdown View Post
That’s too bad for him - great career with the Rangers. Isn’t that what Lucic has too?
Lucic has Scheuermann's Disease which is also degenerative. It's a radical curve of the thoracic spine. I suffer from the same thing, unfortunately. I can't stand very long without pain, but some people are lucky enough to have no pain, so it varies, but I'm finding with age that it's affecting my hips and lower back as well. Anyways, it sucks and wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy, even an Oiler.
badradio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2019, 10:16 AM   #32
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by badradio View Post
Lucic has Scheuermann's Disease which is also degenerative. It's a radical curve of the thoracic spine. I suffer from the same thing, unfortunately. I can't stand very long without pain, but some people are lucky enough to have no pain, so it varies, but I'm finding with age that it's affecting my hips and lower back as well. Anyways, it sucks and wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy, even an Oiler.

Looking at Callahan he's missed a ton of games over the past few years. If its due in part to his back issue it makes sense.


Lucic hasn't missed any games due to his back issue, and its super apparent that the Oilers are having cap problems, I would assume that the NHL would take a really hard look at the Oilers if Lucic suddenly retired due to his condition. Also the Oilers didn't have any fear when they signed him to that contract and cleared him at the start of every season.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2019, 10:34 AM   #33
badradio
First Line Centre
 
badradio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
Looking at Callahan he's missed a ton of games over the past few years. If its due in part to his back issue it makes sense.


Lucic hasn't missed any games due to his back issue, and its super apparent that the Oilers are having cap problems, I would assume that the NHL would take a really hard look at the Oilers if Lucic suddenly retired due to his condition. Also the Oilers didn't have any fear when they signed him to that contract and cleared him at the start of every season.
I was just clarifying what Lucic has. I'm not sure what you're going on about.
badradio is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:47 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy