Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-14-2019, 10:14 AM   #9941
Phagoof
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Exp:
Default

Dube, Frolik, 1st and a conditional 1st if he signs is more like it. Based off the big name traded players from players from previous years.
Phagoof is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:20 AM   #9942
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Yes, my proposal would be with Stone signed to an extension (agreement in place)
Toonage is online now  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:20 AM   #9943
ClubFlames
Posted the 2 millionth post!
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Brodie, Bennett, Frolik, 1st round pick for Mark Stone and Borowiecki?

Extension in place for Stone of course.

Flame away!
__________________

ClubFlames is online now  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:22 AM   #9944
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Just say no to Mark Borowiecki, who is one of the worst defensemen I've ever seen play live. Besides, why would Ottawa trade him when they're about to name him captain?
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is online now  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:24 AM   #9945
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Does anyone really think that we would trade our #2 defenseman before the off season?

Or Bennett for that matter?

The Flames will be looking to add to their current roster, not shake it up significantly.

Adding Mark Stone is great, but not if you are just creating a hole (or two) elsewhere on the roster.

If anything, they would trade prospects/picks to add a player like that, then maybe look to move guys like Brodie at the draft to recover picks/prospects as well as clear cap space to extend Stone.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 02-14-2019, 10:28 AM   #9946
MacDaddy77
First Line Centre
 
MacDaddy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Exp:
Default

Oilers trade Talbot to Flyers

Flyers trade Talbot to Flames for Smith and 2020 2nd.

Talbot wins Conn Smythe for Flames.

E=NG
MacDaddy77 is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MacDaddy77 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-14-2019, 10:36 AM   #9947
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Yes, my proposal would be with Stone signed to an extension (agreement in place)
I don’t see why the Flames feel the need to give Ottawa significantly more value by getting him signed in advance. The Flames could easily tamper through Mime Stone to see if there is a legit chance to sign Mark and then pay the rental price to get him and sign him afterwards.

Guys like Bennett and Kylington need to be retained for the playoffs.

What about this deal

To CGY: Stone
To Ott: 1st CGY, Hudon, 2nd (Mtl), Dube, 3rd CGY (becomes 1st if Stone re-signs in Calgary
To MTL: Frolik

CGY trades 1st, Dube, Frolik, conditional pick gets Stone
Montreal trades Hudon and 2nd to get Frolik
Ottawa trades Stone to get 1st, 2nd ,3rd (could turn into 1st), Hudon, Dube
Vinny01 is online now  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:37 AM   #9948
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I don’t see why the Flames feel the need to give Ottawa significantly more value by getting him signed in advance. The Flames could easily tamper through Mime Stone to see if there is a legit chance to sign Mark and then pay the rental price to get him and sign him afterwards.

Guys like Bennett and Kylington need to be retained for the playoffs.

What about this deal

To CGY: Stone
To Ott: 1st CGY, Hudon, 2nd (Mtl), Dube, 3rd CGY (becomes 1st if Stone re-signs in Calgary
To MTL: Frolik
So my deal is too rich, but yours has the Flames giving up potentially two 1st round picks? Plus the prospect and a roster player?

My idea was the Flames have an agreement that they can sign / extend Stone and give up this year's 1st a top prospect and a roster player.

Last edited by Toonage; 02-14-2019 at 10:40 AM.
Toonage is online now  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:38 AM   #9949
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
The Flames could easily tamper through Mime Stone to see if there is a legit chance to sign Mark
Smart because if they mime it, then nothing can be used against them in a tampering case


Anyways, not sure why Montreal would give up a second for Frolik.
Oling_Roachinen is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:44 AM   #9950
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
Smart because if they mime it, then nothing can be used against them in a tampering case
Unfortunately they'd also learn that Stone would be unwilling to come to Calgary as he's currently stuck in a glass box.
Table 5 is online now  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:44 AM   #9951
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Does anyone really think that we would trade our #2 defenseman before the off season?

Or Bennett for that matter?

The Flames will be looking to add to their current roster, not shake it up significantly.

Adding Mark Stone is great, but not if you are just creating a hole (or two) elsewhere on the roster.

If anything, they would trade prospects/picks to add a player like that, then maybe look to move guys like Brodie at the draft to recover picks/prospects as well as clear cap space to extend Stone.
I agree on Brodie. But I suppose if you are adding Stone, and trading Bennett as part of the price, you are probably moving Frolik to the third line (or something similar) and there's no hole created. Also, after the trade deadline, you might see Dube, Quine and/or Lazar come up. So there will be bodies.
GioforPM is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:45 AM   #9952
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
Unfortunately they'd also learn that Stone would be unwilling to come to Calgary as he's currently stuck in a glass box.
Pull him in using the rope.
Toonage is online now  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:55 AM   #9953
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
Smart because if they mime it, then nothing can be used against them in a tampering case


Anyways, not sure why Montreal would give up a second for Frolik.
They are flush with cap space and also a team that was trying to sign him when the Flames did
Vinny01 is online now  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:57 AM   #9954
Stanley
First Line Centre
 
Stanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

We already have the least amount of hits in the league...I'm not a fan of trading away Bennett, one of the only guys who can throw a hit, especially in the playoffs.

That's my main concern with the roster - we ain't goin' deep in the playoffs with an average of 12-14 hits/game
Stanley is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:58 AM   #9955
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
So my deal is too rich, but yours has the Flames giving up potentially two 1st round picks? Plus the prospect and a roster player?

My idea was the Flames have an agreement that they can sign / extend Stone and give up this year's 1st a top prospect and a roster player.
Yes we can’t afford to give up Kylington and Dube imo we need these ELC’s now. Frolik while still valuable is a needed cap dump, and we only give up the pick if he stays. I don’t see the sign and trade scenario as realistic.

My deal keeps defensive depth for the playoffs yours removes it.
Vinny01 is online now  
Old 02-14-2019, 10:58 AM   #9956
Bend it like Bourgeois
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

for the talked about acquisition cost / salary I hope Stone ends up elsewhere.

He’s a good winger you can count on for 20 goals and 60 points for as long as his skating holds up. That’s not worth a big hit to cap long term and the team depth it would take IMO.
Bend it like Bourgeois is online now  
Old 02-14-2019, 11:00 AM   #9957
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Yes we can’t afford to give up Kylington and Dube imo we need these ELC’s now. Frolik while still valuable is a needed cap dump, and we only give up the pick if he stays. I don’t see the sign and trade scenario as realistic.

My deal keeps defensive depth for the playoffs yours removes it.
Gotcha. I can understand that approach for sure.

Just for the record, my deal isn't a sign and trade. Ottawa trades Stone, we then sign him. Agreement would be in place prior to the trade that Calgary would sign him. My assumption is that once Ottawa agrees to hear offers they allow the agent to discuss terms with interested teams.
Toonage is online now  
Old 02-14-2019, 11:18 AM   #9958
Hoop27
Backup Goalie
 
Hoop27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Does anyone really think that we would trade our #2 defenseman before the off season?

.

Really depends on if you think Brodie is a legit #2 or if he's a fraud being carried by Gio.


Personally if Brodie gets a top 6 forward I think you have to take that risk as I'm not sold on him.
__________________
Hoop27 is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 11:20 AM   #9959
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
When we traded for Hamilton it had to have been for Bennett.
When we traded for Hamonic, obviously Bennett was going the other way.
When we traded for Lindholm, of course the Hurricanes were getting Bennett so both players would get a change of scenery.

Bennett "has" to part of the package for a Mark Stone that is presumably NOT re-signing in OTT

So because he wasn't needed to do other deals, means he wont be the request in any others.

Solid logic.
transplant99 is offline  
Old 02-14-2019, 11:23 AM   #9960
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

I think we could probably land Talbot via a third party.

Talbot sent to Philly for a late pick. They flip him to Calgary for an earlier pick.

Flames try and find Smith a home.
Knut is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy