02-05-2019, 12:38 PM
|
#101
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler
Yes, the 30 year-old guys will be going cup-in-hand, begging for 2 year deals or PTOs. The amount of money available is still the same - it just looks like it will get paid during the 21-27 years now.
|
It makes sense that players get paid more during their most productive years, rather than pay players for what they did during their most productive years
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Geeoff For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-05-2019, 12:43 PM
|
#102
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Such an odd move the Leafs wouldn’t find a way to get that 8 year deal done. I wonder if injuries played a role at all.
Also furthur proves Johnny is hockey’s best contract but also almost guarantees Chucky is an $8M plus man.
|
|
|
02-05-2019, 12:44 PM
|
#103
|
|
Franchise Player
|
What was the rush? Leafs gave up the money but didn't get the term...I think media pressure is getting to the GM
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
02-05-2019, 12:45 PM
|
#104
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
Tree’s two big deals (Johnny and Sean) were re-signed prior to McDavid, Draisatl, and now Matthews.
Tkachuk will a significant change on that front, especially if we go for a 6-8 year deal. Anything in that range I would think will have to be north of 8M now. Not that he doesn’t deserve it, but yeah - I’m not going to be surprised to see Tkachuk’s AAV closer to 9M than 8M.
|
True but they were signed after Johansen, Benn, Hedman, ROR, Ekblad, Tarasenko, who all made more. Treliving is good at this stuff. I expect Tkachuk to be tough, but I also expect Treliving to stand his ground pretty well. I don't think Tkachuk will like holding out as much as Willy did.
|
|
|
02-05-2019, 12:46 PM
|
#105
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone
Tree’s two big deals (Johnny and Sean) were re-signed prior to McDavid, Draisatl, and now Matthews.
Tkachuk will a significant change on that front, especially if we go for a 6-8 year deal. Anything in that range I would think will have to be north of 8M now. Not that he doesn’t deserve it, but yeah - I’m not going to be surprised to see Tkachuk’s AAV closer to 9M than 8M.
|
I still think he gets Tkachuk under 8. I think what he’s done is built a standard of “don’t GAF what idiot GMs do, this is how OUR team is going to be structured.”
There’s a cap. If you want max contracts there are ways to get them and almost none of them involve being on a top team surrounded by other elite players.
__________________
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Coach For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-05-2019, 12:51 PM
|
#106
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gundo
Such an odd move the Leafs wouldn’t find a way to get that 8 year deal done. I wonder if injuries played a role at all.
|
If Matthew didn't want to sign for longer, there's nothing the Leafs can do.
Maybe Matthews isn't that excited to play in Toronto?
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Itse For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-05-2019, 12:51 PM
|
#107
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gundo
Such an odd move the Leafs wouldn’t find a way to get that 8 year deal done. I wonder if injuries played a role at all.
Also furthur proves Johnny is hockey’s best contract but also almost guarantees Chucky is an $8M plus man.
|
I think the Matthews camp probably wanted an 8 year deal that matched or exceeded the McDavid contract which may have been prohibitive for the Leafs given they have to fit Marner in as well.
|
|
|
02-05-2019, 12:52 PM
|
#108
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh
...with each SB payment, CRA takes almost half of it away at once. That's a lot of money. These rich hockey players pay a lot of taxes. Then escrow payments, agent fees etc. etc. etc. I heard they receive less then 25% of the gross pay home.
|
They hire the best accountants in the world and use many tricks to get around taxes. Even without accounting for any tax loopholes they take him 50% of the pay taking out taxes and agent fees. its not where close to as low as 25%. And guys in some American states will take home as high as 60%. With tax loopholes i have no doubt these guys can probably get it up to 70 or even 80%.
|
|
|
02-05-2019, 12:52 PM
|
#109
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
True but they were signed after Johansen, Benn, Hedman, ROR, Ekblad, Tarasenko, who all made more. Treliving is good at this stuff. I expect Tkachuk to be tough, but I also expect Treliving to stand his ground pretty well. I don't think Tkachuk will like holding out as much as Willy did.
|
Tkachuk won't fold. Its going to be a tough deal to make. His family has money.
His dad signed an offer sheet as an RFA (witch Chicago, matched by Coyotes) which was front loaded and then held out mid-contract until December one year (with Coyotes).
The old 'do what's best for the team' thing is going to be a tough sell.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-05-2019, 12:53 PM
|
#110
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Dubas is a terrible GM.
|
|
|
02-05-2019, 12:58 PM
|
#111
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gundo
Such an odd move the Leafs wouldn’t find a way to get that 8 year deal done. I wonder if injuries played a role at all.
Also furthur proves Johnny is hockey’s best contract but also almost guarantees Chucky is an $8M plus man.
|
It's not a bad thing to take Matthews to 26. They will still be able to offer him the extra year, and it seems far more likely a guy will actually be an $12-14M player between 26-34 as opposed to 29-37 or 30-38.
|
|
|
02-05-2019, 01:06 PM
|
#112
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan
Am I the only one who thinks Matthews is not the best player on his team?
|
Nope. I think Mitch Marner's a better overall player than Matthews. If I were Marner, I'd ask for the same as what Matthews got.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Yen Man For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-05-2019, 01:07 PM
|
#113
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
If Matthew didn't want to sign for longer, there's nothing the Leafs can do.
Maybe Matthews isn't that excited to play in Toronto?
|
Ha - yeah that was my first thought too. For all the comments about McDavid bolting Edmonton for Toronto the first chance he gets, it's Matthews who signed for a significantly shorter term.
|
|
|
02-05-2019, 01:12 PM
|
#114
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Considering it is almost all RFA years that contract is stupid.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jacks For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-05-2019, 01:27 PM
|
#115
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Seems like a brutal deal but for the most part many elite superstars signed 5 year deals out of elc. Crosby, Malkin, Towes, Kane, Stamkos all signed 5 year deals out of elc.
|
|
|
02-05-2019, 01:30 PM
|
#116
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Rural AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
1. signing bonuses get paid out in lump sums instead of getting paid like regular salary. Imagine getting your entire year's salary in one lump sum payment.
2. Signing bonuses get paid out regardless of a lockout or work stoppage
3. Signing bonuses get paid in full even if the player gets bought out
|
I hope Matthews is good at managing his money. Might be difficult waiting for that next cheque. 
He might have to borrow money midseason. "hey man, i'll pay you back on payday!"
|
|
|
02-05-2019, 01:34 PM
|
#117
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Seems I may be the minority but I like this deal and hope to see more of them. Where the player is buying term, maybe worth it. Where the team is buying term, I don’t think it is.
If it were a McDavid deal the leafs would have at $1-2m less salary room in the next 5 years and pay more $ up front. The return is they hope to save a 2-3m in years 6-8 (when its worth less) and hope Matthews stays healthy and happy. When do they want to win? If they lose Matthews in year 6 that’s still a lot easier problem to solve than being Oiler’ed in the early years.
|
|
|
02-05-2019, 01:38 PM
|
#118
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
1. signing bonuses get paid out in lump sums instead of getting paid like regular salary. Imagine getting your entire year's salary in one lump sum payment.
2. Signing bonuses get paid out regardless of a lockout or work stoppage
3. Signing bonuses get paid in full even if the player gets bought out
|
Could part of this be the 1/3 v 2/3 buyout rules?
Because it takes him to 26, if it were all salary only 1/3 of that contract is really guaranteed. I think?
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GullFoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-05-2019, 01:43 PM
|
#120
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
The irony is that this is exactly the kind of contract the league envisoned when the cap was introduced in 2005. They figured nobody would sign deals longer than 3-5 years as players would want short contracts so they could easily sign for more money as the cap rose. Only took 14 years for a big name player to live up to that expectation.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 PM.
|
|