Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-14-2018, 12:10 PM   #41
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Maybe not, but he is certainly more likely to put up points than Bennett and is unequivocally better defensively. I can see Frolik getting to 40ish pts with a full season of Backlund and Tkachuk....assuming healthy. Bennett looks like he will never be able to do that.

Agreed that Neal should be the easy solution but when has anything come easy for this club?
By age I don't know if I agree.

I'd assume Frolik has topped out or is in decline to some point. Hard to say. I won't talk about empty net goals or I'll drive some crazy.

If Bennett never finds it though, hard to disagree. He hasn't been productive. I'm just one of the few that still holds out hope based on numbers.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 12-14-2018, 12:16 PM   #42
FBI
Franchise Player
 
FBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Last year Jankowski recorded three powerplay points in 58:36. In 2018 Derek Ryan has four powerplay points in 52:50. I think the advantages of swapping Jankowski and Ryan are either entirely misconstrued or badly exaggerated.
Not that simple, who do you think has more potential to have more powerplay points over the next 4 years? Ryan is what he is. It would be beneficial to see what Janko can potentially be.
__________________
FBI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2018, 12:16 PM   #43
Always Earned Never Given
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cycling76er View Post
That's not his schtick
Correct! His schtick is to throw the lines in the blender when things aren't going right instead of a twig!
Always Earned Never Given is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2018, 12:19 PM   #44
Rollin22x
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Rural AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
First shift of the game... the fans look up and there is a cage coming down from the rafters right to the middle of the ice.

Tag-Team match:

Backlund+Giordano (Gaudreau as manager)

vs.

Koivu+Dumba (Staal as manager)

The winning team gets to join Connor McDavid for dinner one night!
The losing team has to have dinner with Connor would be more motivational.
Rollin22x is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rollin22x For This Useful Post:
Old 12-14-2018, 12:20 PM   #45
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FBI View Post
Not that simple, who do you think has more potential to have more powerplay points over the next 4 years? Ryan is what he is. It would be beneficial to see what Janko can potentially be.
Four years from now? That has virtually nothing to do with this season. I don't dispute that Ryan "is what he is" but as of today and likely for the balance of the season he is a better all-round player than Jankowski.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2018, 12:24 PM   #46
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
By age I don't know if I agree.

I'd assume Frolik has topped out or is in decline to some point. Hard to say. I won't talk about empty net goals or I'll drive some crazy.

If Bennett never finds it though, hard to disagree. He hasn't been productive. I'm just one of the few that still holds out hope based on numbers.
Maybe he is...but at age 30 i dont think its a hinderance at this point. Perhaps his injury recovery abilities are affected but i don't believe his skating is....or maybe i just hope that's the case?

At any rate I just can't believe Bennett is the answer for top 6 minutes... even if the fancy stats suggest he should be, because the eye test says exactly the opposite.

Neal needs to damn well figure it out, then everyone slots in where they should and would be most effective.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-14-2018, 12:27 PM   #47
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

The answer to Jankowski versus Ryan on PP2 is probably "none of the above". In fact, it might be Lindholm:

Gaudreau/Monahan/Neal/Tkachuk/Gio

Bennett/Lindholm/Czarnik (or Janko/Mangiapane)/Brodie/Andersson

Long run, I'd like to see what Dube or even Quine could do.

Until the team starts losing on a regular basis I don't see much point in questioning Peters' choices though.

ETA: I had Neal on two units. Part of the point of my lines was to put him with Gaudreau. Czarnik/Jankowski/Mangiapane on unit 2 isn't ideal but not everyone is a scorer on a PP unit. Hell, put Hathaway there in front of the net.

Last edited by GioforPM; 12-14-2018 at 12:34 PM.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 12-14-2018, 12:29 PM   #48
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
I can't say I have been very impressed with Czarnik so far this season. 1 point and -5 in the last 10 games.
Hard to get down on the guy when he has not played enough and not utilized properly. I like most of what Peters does but not his handling of Czarnik.
dissentowner is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2018, 12:30 PM   #49
Flames Fan, Ph.D.
#1 Goaltender
 
Flames Fan, Ph.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Underground
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Last year Jankowski recorded three powerplay points in 58:36. In 2018 Derek Ryan has four powerplay points in 52:50. I think the advantages of swapping Jankowski and Ryan are either entirely misconstrued or badly exaggerated.
Would be a fair comparison if the efficiency of the two powerplays was the same.
Flames Fan, Ph.D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2018, 12:30 PM   #50
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
The answer to Jankowski versus Ryan on PP2 is probably "none of the above". In fact, it might be Lindholm:

Gaudreau/Monahan/Neal/Tkachuk/Gio

Bennett/Lindholm/Neal/Brodie/Andersson

Long run, I'd like to see what Dube or even Quine could do.

Until the team starts losing on a regular basis I don't see much point in questioning Peters' choices though.
I doubt you will see Peters and company go to 2 different configurations on the PP.

Its either 3 F's and 2 D or 4 F's and 1 D for both.

Continuity and repetition are just to important for success in those areas IMO.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2018, 12:36 PM   #51
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Hard to get down on the guy when he has not played enough and not utilized properly. I like most of what Peters does but not his handling of Czarnik.
When Czarnik shows something, I imagine Peters will give him more. To me, his play has explained why he gets attention from teams when he's available, but not a lot of time after he's on a team. His compete level isn't great, he stays outside a lot - not in the dirty areas. He's a bit like Sven.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 12-14-2018, 12:36 PM   #52
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Fan, Ph.D. View Post
Would be a fair comparison if the efficiency of the two powerplays was the same.
Maybe. But for both players these are second-unit minutes, and with the low number it is pretty difficult to determine which of these players ihas a greater share in the effectiveness/ineffectiveness of his unit's powerplay production.

But my point was not too suggest that Ryan has been a good fit on the powerplay. It was rather an attempt to balance some of the exaggerated opinions of some of the Flames players. Jankowski is not really a better option to play ahead of Ryan, and yet discussions tend to focus on Ryan's second-line promotion as some outrageous and obvious injustice. It's not.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2018, 12:37 PM   #53
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Last year Jankowski recorded three powerplay points in 58:36. In 2018 Derek Ryan has four powerplay points in 52:50. I think the advantages of swapping Jankowski and Ryan are either entirely misconstrued or badly exaggerated.
I think it makes a whole lot more sense to swap Ryan with Andersson on the PP. Andersson has greater offensive instincts and also a good point shot. He can also make better zone entries too.

It’s clear they like the right shot in that place and Andersson fits that too.

It’s just a better utilization of the skill on this team.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 868904 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-14-2018, 12:38 PM   #54
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
I doubt you will see Peters and company go to 2 different configurations on the PP.

Its either 3 F's and 2 D or 4 F's and 1 D for both.

Continuity and repetition are just to important for success in those areas IMO.
Maybe not. Sometimes I think it's a benefit to having two different looks or styles to the PP. You can counter different PKs.

But I wasn't thinking of using Brodie as a D on PP2. I thought of him more in the Gaudreau role. He's the best puck carrier/passer in that group.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2018, 12:40 PM   #55
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Hard to get down on the guy when he has not played enough and not utilized properly. I like most of what Peters does but not his handling of Czarnik.
I'm not down on him, I just don't see what others do in him. I understand that he hasn't been playing choice assignments with choice players. Still,what has he done to prove that he should get those chances? The few times he has played greater assignments nothing came from it. I understand that averaging 10:47 a night isn't conducive to great counting stats. However, Most nights he is not making the most of his time, even Lomberg and Hathway has been making impactful plays,even with less ice time. what has he done to prove that he deserves more.
TheIronMaiden is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2018, 12:42 PM   #56
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Maybe not. Sometimes I think it's a benefit to having two different looks or styles to the PP. You can counter different PKs.

But I wasn't thinking of using Brodie as a D on PP2. I thought of him more in the Gaudreau role. He's the best puck carrier/passer in that group.
This is a bit beside the point, but am I correct in thinking that the second hit has been more productive as of late? They certainly have looked better to me than they did through the first 5/6 weeks.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2018, 12:47 PM   #57
rohara66
First Line Centre
 
rohara66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Says a lot about Gio....

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Michael Russo @RussoHockey
Koivu said Mark Giordano texted him and apologized. Koivu called it a “classy move.” #mnwild



Says a lot about Dumba....

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Pat Steinberg @Fan960Steinberg
Mikael Backlund on the Matt Dumba hit that put him out of action just over a week ago: “I had my head down, but...40 seconds left, I don’t know if he has to do that. I think it’s an unnecessary play. Says a lot about the guy.” #Flames
rohara66 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rohara66 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-14-2018, 12:52 PM   #58
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
When Czarnik shows something, I imagine Peters will give him more. To me, his play has explained why he gets attention from teams when he's available, but not a lot of time after he's on a team. His compete level isn't great, he stays outside a lot - not in the dirty areas. He's a bit like Sven.
Czarnik does not fore check well, or win a lot of board battles.


Czarnik to me is a prototypical open ice player. I don't have a problem with that, but to find success in that role, you need to make the most of the space you are given when you have the puck, and be able to put the puck into open ice well. Moreover, you need to defend passing lanes well. It is debatable if he has been effective in doing that.
TheIronMaiden is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2018, 12:57 PM   #59
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Your eye test. Not “the” eye test.

When Bennett was on that line had more going in than at any other point this season.

Not sure why he let up for 3-4 games. He doesn’t have the production tone made up on the forecheck and energy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 12-14-2018, 01:03 PM   #60
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

sure hope johnny wears gloves with extra padding.... Have zero respect for Minnesota and get the feeling they are going to take liberties with Johnny tomorrow night
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to oldschoolcalgary For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:28 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy