Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Are you for or against Calgary hosting the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games?
I am for Calgary hosting 285 55.66%
I am against Calgary hosting 227 44.34%
Voters: 512. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-15-2018, 04:29 PM   #1701
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
Well the question I would have for No voters is, what do we do with McMahon and other facilities now that the easiest path to fix these places has evaporated?

It would seem paradoxical that people voted No because they wanted more lavish and high-quality facilities (no Value Village Olympics) without having spiraling costs.
The Olympic venues (not McMahon) have been continually upgraded with provincial dollars. This will continue well into the future and does not need an Olympics to facilitate. The Oval, the Nordic Center, the sliding Center, and winsport have all had millions of Provincial dollars spent on them in the past 10 years (links to sources are in my previous posts in this thread)

Yes this would have been an easy way to get capital for them but having these facilities compete with libraries and rec centers for dollars is the correct approach.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 04:32 PM   #1702
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis View Post
And that's what's kind of unique about the No vote here. It wasn't like there was one unified message as to why people voted No, there were a bunch of reasons. I guess I'd say the common theme running through them all was anger.
Both sides could have used more time to actually think about the facts and the communication behind it. It still angers me to know that people voted No based on thinking hockey would be in Edmonton; just makes me cynical that people don't check for themselves, but that's democracy for you. Hell, that's basically politics every election - vote for the shirt color rather than the platform.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 04:33 PM   #1703
red sky
#1 Goaltender
 
red sky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Interesting to see the ward breakdown and the skew towards No for the Advanced Poles. That surprised me.
red sky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 04:35 PM   #1704
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Wow. Those Advanced Polls killed it.
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 04:36 PM   #1705
doozwimp
Powerplay Quarterback
 
doozwimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Couldnt agree more with Francis here. https://www.sportsnet.ca/olympics/ca...ity-city-need/
doozwimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 04:41 PM   #1706
OMG!WTF!
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
Both sides could have used more time to actually think about the facts and the communication behind it. It still angers me to know that people voted No based on thinking hockey would be in Edmonton; just makes me cynical that people don't check for themselves, but that's democracy for you. Hell, that's basically politics every election - vote for the shirt color rather than the platform.

Kind of bugs me that people voted yes without knowing how much Whistler was going to want. Or where some other events were taking place. Or how much housing we were actually going to build. Or if magic insurance exists.Or that a yes vote means a 10-1 roi. But I get what you're saying. It is annoying when people vote with bad info.
OMG!WTF! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 04:41 PM   #1707
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by red sky View Post
Interesting to see the ward breakdown and the skew towards No for the Advanced Poles. That surprised me.


Ward 7 did a bit of a switch from the advance polling. Wonder if that’s just the tendency of people who wanted to vote early, or if people had a change of heart.
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 04:42 PM   #1708
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doozwimp View Post
Couldnt agree more with Francis here. https://www.sportsnet.ca/olympics/ca...ity-city-need/
Couldn't agree more that he's the worst sports writer in Canada not named Damien Cox or Steve Simmons.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Senator Clay Davis For This Useful Post:
Old 11-15-2018, 04:45 PM   #1709
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF! View Post
Kind of bugs me that people voted yes without knowing how much Whistler was going to want. Or where some other events were taking place. Or how much housing we were actually going to build. Or if magic insurance exists.Or that a yes vote means a 10-1 roi. But I get what you're saying. It is annoying when people vote with bad info.
You're making fun and I get it, but the point remains. Both sides could have used with more time and clarity.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ozy_Flame For This Useful Post:
Old 11-15-2018, 04:46 PM   #1710
Looch City
Looooooooooooooch
 
Looch City's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doozwimp View Post
Couldnt agree more with Francis here. https://www.sportsnet.ca/olympics/ca...ity-city-need/
Oh my god that was TERRIBLE. Seriously, wtf is this cringy ####:

Quote:
This “no” vote marks the beginning of the erosion of the Olympic legacy that bolstered the Canadian winter Olympic teams to the top of the medal standings the last few Games.

Our medal count will diminish moving forward as facilities continue to deteriorate and disappear, along with the Olympic spirit and dreams athletes once gleaned from Canadian-held Games.

Some young voters simply couldn’t understand the impact hosting the Games can have on the lives of everyone in a city, as volunteers, spectators, business owners or simply proud Canadians.

It’s transformative, motivating, inspiring and impossible to put a dollar figure on. What happened late Tuesday night was a terrible loss for this city – something it has been racking up of late.

This city’s outlook could have changed, things could have been better.
And then Canada will end as a country and North America will be a wasteland forever. Bleh
Looch City is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Looch City For This Useful Post:
Old 11-15-2018, 04:51 PM   #1711
OMG!WTF!
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
You're making fun and I get it, but the point remains. Both sides could have used with more time and clarity.

Absolutely. I think we were trending towards a yes. But there are just too many holes in the story that would have to be filled with City of Calgary money only.
OMG!WTF! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 04:55 PM   #1712
Wiggum_PI
Scoring Winger
 
Wiggum_PI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by red sky View Post
Interesting to see the ward breakdown and the skew towards No for the Advanced Poles. That surprised me.
Apparently the Yes side was expecting the advanced polls to be very slanted towards No. Like many people have already said, the numbers are a lot closer if you remove the advance votes.
Wiggum_PI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 05:07 PM   #1713
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doozwimp View Post
Couldnt agree more with Francis here. https://www.sportsnet.ca/olympics/ca...ity-city-need/
Quote:
Pipelines aren’t being built, taxes will continue to jump due to all the empty office space downtown – this city is in one hell of a bind. Forget about the 17-day party, the Olympics could have been a catalyst for change.
How could the Olympics have changed empty offices and unbuilt pipelines?

Even the amount of jobs created would have been minimal vs building new infrastructure.

Weird take.

Last edited by transplant99; 11-15-2018 at 05:16 PM.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-15-2018, 05:09 PM   #1714
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggum_PI View Post
Apparently the Yes side was expecting the advanced polls to be very slanted towards No. Like many people have already said, the numbers are a lot closer if you remove the advance votes.
Why would you remove advance votes?

There was nothing close about this....which is surprising in and of itself IMO.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-15-2018, 05:14 PM   #1715
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iggy City View Post
Oh my god that was TERRIBLE. Seriously, wtf is this cringy ####:



And then Canada will end as a country and North America will be a wasteland forever. Bleh
He does at least after the typical bluster acknowledge the real issue around messaging and timing.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 05:16 PM   #1716
Wiggum_PI
Scoring Winger
 
Wiggum_PI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Why would you remove advance votes?

There was nothing close about this....which is surprising in and of itself IMO.
Just a hypothetical scenario, I'm not suggesting the advanced votes are any less important then the ones cast on the actual day.

I wonder what the numbers would have been like if the vote was after the City released their budget proposal for the next 4 years.
Wiggum_PI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 05:18 PM   #1717
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
Well the question I would have for No voters is, what do we do with McMahon and other facilities now that the easiest path to fix these places has evaporated?

It would seem paradoxical that people voted No because they wanted more lavish and high-quality facilities (no Value Village Olympics) without having spiraling costs.

We make deals like 50 other North American cities without Olympics do. It's what we elect councillors for.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire


Last edited by GirlySports; 11-15-2018 at 05:24 PM.
GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 05:31 PM   #1718
Cuz
First Line Centre
 
Cuz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Royal Oak
Exp:
Default

Direct democracy just doesn't work
Cuz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 05:43 PM   #1719
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports View Post
We make deals like 50 other North American cities without Olympics do. It's what we elect councillors for.
With who? We're having a hard enough time getting an arena funded and doing it without too much public money in a time that Calgarians think we shouldn't be spending money on frivolous things, you think the City is going to have CSEC fund a new CFL stadium too? And where is Calgary going to get said money?

It's odd to say you don't want the Olympics but think the City has funds to slap together deals with CSEC for new stadiums and arenas and maintain all the facilities on the docket the Olympics would have covered. Perhaps that can happen spread out over multiple years, but it's no insignificant number.

The new Flames arena will happen because people want it and want it now, but you have to explain to me how McMahon will come to fruition. I am sure both sides would love to know.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2018, 05:49 PM   #1720
stone hands
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

How about we just bulldoze it and forget the cfl and 3 down football ever existed
stone hands is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to stone hands For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:11 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy