Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Are you for or against Calgary hosting the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games?
I am for Calgary hosting 285 55.66%
I am against Calgary hosting 227 44.34%
Voters: 512. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-14-2018, 01:25 AM   #1361
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

This was expected, when most of the people voting didn't even know for sure where the ski events would be held or if freakin Edmonton would get some hockey games in their new shiny arena you know even civic pride couldn't make this popular.

Just my opinion but I think Calgarians would have said yes with total transparency, the games 100% held in Calgary/Canmore and new pro arena builds, even if it meant another 1.5 billion.
Snuffleupagus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Snuffleupagus For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2018, 01:29 AM   #1362
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
10:1 ROI

Mic drop.
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dion For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2018, 01:39 AM   #1363
Frank MetaMusil
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
 
Frank MetaMusil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
Exp:
Default

Calgary votes down tax increase. Finally.

A part of me still thinks they will try to ram it home without provincial funding.

As said above, I would have voted yes with the Flames kicking in some funds for a new rink.
Frank MetaMusil is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank MetaMusil For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2018, 01:50 AM   #1364
Boreal
First Line Centre
 
Boreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank MetaMusil View Post
Calgary votes down tax increase. Finally.

A part of me still thinks they will try to ram it home without provincial funding.

As said above, I would have voted yes with the Flames kicking in some funds for a new rink.
Hahahaha.... that’s a laugh a minute. Suddenly all the infrastructure and services will repair and pay for themselves. Calgary’s taxes are a bargain. I’ve never paid less and received more.

Enjoy paying less tax collectively and getting nickled and dimed.

Best of luck getting a new rink, that is pure corporate welfare.

I can’t wait to see how that flies in the face of this populism whirlwind.
Boreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2018, 01:57 AM   #1365
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nobles_point View Post
Hahahaha.... that’s a laugh a minute. Suddenly all the infrastructure and services will repair and pay for themselves. Calgary’s taxes are a bargain. I’ve never paid less and received more.

Enjoy paying less tax collectively and getting nickled and dimed.

Best of luck getting a new rink, that is pure corporate welfare.

I can’t wait to see how that flies in the face of this populism whirlwind.
Don't you get it, man? We gotta take care of the homeless!!
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2018, 02:05 AM   #1366
Frank MetaMusil
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
 
Frank MetaMusil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nobles_point View Post
Hahahaha.... that’s a laugh a minute. Suddenly all the infrastructure and services will repair and pay for themselves. Calgary’s taxes are a bargain. I’ve never paid less and received more.

Enjoy paying less tax collectively and getting nickled and dimed.

Best of luck getting a new rink, that is pure corporate welfare.

I can’t wait to see how that flies in the face of this populism whirlwind.
I'm being honest, laugh all you want.

The Flames adding a cut to the bid was a huge positive in my view and would have swayed my vote.

Banter on about infrastructure though, by all means.
Frank MetaMusil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2018, 02:19 AM   #1367
Boreal
First Line Centre
 
Boreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank MetaMusil View Post
I'm being honest, laugh all you want.

The Flames adding a cut to the bid was a huge positive in my view and would have swayed my vote.

Banter on about infrastructure though, by all means.
Right. Because this is about you. I forgot.
Boreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2018, 02:49 AM   #1368
Frank MetaMusil
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
 
Frank MetaMusil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nobles_point View Post
Right. Because this is about you. I forgot.
I got to vote, so yes it is.
Frank MetaMusil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2018, 05:53 AM   #1369
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Why vote no? If you needed to vote with your wallet, just take a holiday during the Olympics and rent out whatever property you're paying tax on.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2018, 06:42 AM   #1370
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N-E-B View Post

Hosting would have been cool but let’s be honest, we are not and never will be a world class city. New York, Los Angeles, Tokyo, London... THOSE are world class cities. What the hell does “world class city” even mean and why do people care? This is still a great place to live and it will be in the future. I couldn’t care less if some hack from somewhere else thinks we’re world class or nor.
Thats not the worst thing to aim for, Olympics or not. Heck I still think Calgary isn't in the same tier as Vancouver/Toronto/Montreal, despite being measured with a high standard of living - as do most people when they think about Canada. When I'm out of the country I still have to explain that Calgary is in Western Canada and it's where Cool Runnings was filmed
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2018, 06:52 AM   #1371
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

People aren't afraid of tax hikes or dreams this was just a poor bid and the Olympics some feel are priced out of their range. The facilities improvements they will never use.

The 88 bid we got all the facilities and c train plus sport wasn't so expensive.

People forget the expo 2005 where we would have gotten more infrastructure.

This just did not have enough and was presented poorly. The yes ads over the last few weeks and flying in athletes turned some people off too.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GirlySports For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2018, 06:55 AM   #1372
the_only_turek_fan
Lifetime Suspension
 
the_only_turek_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
So JT and Notley basically offer Calgary free money to help upgrade/build 11 facilities and we say no.

That was probably the only time we're going to get offered free money to see actual tangible benefits in the City, and we said no.

Now that money from Sport Canada is probably going to get spent elsewhere in the country since Calgary doesn't want it.

And Calgary is still on the hook to upgrade/build most of those facilities, but we have now chosen to do it alone.

I honestly don't know what to say other than I am disappointed right now, but honestly not really surprised.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary View Post
There's nothing stopping Calgary from putting in another bid for a future olympics...

Will there be more competition? Maybe, the way bids are going, who knows if that's the case.
I am ok with a future bid.

Let's do it right and be transparent about it.

What killed this was changing security costs at 11:29 the night before the bid was going to be voted down and Trumpian style misinformation like the 10:1 return on investment.
the_only_turek_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to the_only_turek_fan For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2018, 06:58 AM   #1373
calf
broke the first rule
 
calf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan View Post
I am ok with a future bid.

Let's do it right and be transparent about it.

What killed this was changing security costs at 11:29 the night before the bid was going to be voted down and Trumpian style misinformation like the 10:1 return on investment.
This, and the clear lack of co-ordination with all three levels of government. It was sloppy and disorganized. I had no trust in the process going forward. I love investing in and improving this city. I love the Olympics. This bid didn't do it for me but it was painful for me to vote no.
calf is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to calf For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2018, 07:02 AM   #1374
Red Slinger
First Line Centre
 
Red Slinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

I am disappointed but not really surprised at the result. I don't think the organizing committee did a good job but I also don't think they were as bad as some are painting them.

It seems to me a lot of the issues were around the messaging from the federal government. They came in very late to the process with their funding and them muddied the waters in terms of security costs. Really the only party that was consistent and accurate in the messaging throughout the whole process was the provincial government.

Even so, I think the games, even under this less-than-perfect proposal would have been a net positive for the city. I think a lot of people that voted did so strictly for financial (ie. tax) reasons and they lost the forest through the trees.
__________________
The of and to a in is I that it for you was with on as have but be they
Red Slinger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Red Slinger For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2018, 07:03 AM   #1375
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports View Post
The facilities improvements they will never use.
You don't think Calgarians would have used a new Field House (much like any other rec centre in the City) or an upgraded MacMahon? Personally I think those are the kinds of projects Calgarians would enjoy.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ozy_Flame For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2018, 07:06 AM   #1376
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Really disappointed however I am not surprised.

Lack of information was a huge issue, the whole process was a mess

Committee and the City did an extremely poor job in my view.

Simply ran out of time
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2018, 07:09 AM   #1377
Hockeyguy15
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk View Post
Indeed it was very bad. They got obliterated by Councillor Gondek shortly after.

My post-mortem:

Extremely late breaking deal was fatal. No controlled narrative (In extremely long exploratory phase) because yes (which were qualified on having a deal) sat on the sidelines for a long time waiting. When it did come together at one minute to midnight. It was bungled. A lot of trust lost. The deal was good, I think it would have been a yes (or closer to yes) had the deal come together much earlier and more smoothly.

Not enough shiny balls. I maintained that an arena contingent on yes, would have swung things. BidCo insisted that this would have run afoul of the movement toward 80%+ recycled venues. But is was the paradox of the bid - not a lot of new stuff, but still a pretty high price tag.

Other unforced errors (like above video) and several others.
You pretty much hit the nail on the head with this.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
Looks like you'll need one long before I will. May I suggest deflection king?
Hockeyguy15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2018, 07:20 AM   #1378
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
You don't think Calgarians would have used a new Field House (much like any other rec centre in the City) or an upgraded MacMahon? Personally I think those are the kinds of projects Calgarians would enjoy.
At what cost. I go to Westside Rec. Membership is $740 per year. That priced out of many people range. I gave it due to fitness spending at work.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2018, 07:21 AM   #1379
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I voted yes but can't ignore how half-assed the plan was with Edmonton, Whistler, etc hosting some of the events and trotting out band-aid money wasting on McMahon stadium and building a 5k seat arena that nobody asked for. Nenshi and the other people organizing this bid are simply is a little out of touch with people's expectations of hosting an event like this. If you aren't going to use a lot of the federal funding on new legacy facilities it's going to be a hard sell. Go big or go home really as it just felt like they were trying to organize the poor-man's Winter Olympics.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 11-14-2018, 07:22 AM   #1380
Salt Water Cowboy #10
Scoring Winger
 
Salt Water Cowboy #10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

So had the city voted yes, then the olympics would be bid on? No gaurantee that we would’ve got the games?

My take is this is like a student getting out of university with huge debt to pay. But then going out and buying a new pimped out mustang. He’d gain some popularity and have some fun, but a few years down the road he still has huge debt. Debt that will now take longer to pay off. I know it’s a very conservative analogy, but we need to solve the problems here in the city before we create new ones
Salt Water Cowboy #10 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Salt Water Cowboy #10 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy