Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-28-2018, 08:33 PM   #41
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
I think Valimaki vs Andersson. Prout vs Kulak as the final cut.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah that makes sense. Now I think Valimaki needs to be clearly ahead to make it as would benefit more from AHL than Andersson.

But if he is better, he is better.

And I think Kulak gets sent down.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2018, 08:53 PM   #42
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
I think Valimaki vs Andersson. Prout vs Kulak as the final cut.
Makes a lot of sense. I know a lot of fans, including myself, would rather see both Andersson and Valimaki stick but realistically that probably doesn't happen.

Not to worry, we're one injury from seeing them both with the big club, and it's just a matter of time before we see them both full time. Either could handle bottom pairing minutes right now in my opinion
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2018, 09:10 PM   #43
JohnnyTitan
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

I heard on the radio today that Valimaki's ELC will slide due to his late birthdate if he plays fewer than 10 games.

So there's that to break any ties.

I wish Rasmus was LH and Valimaki was RH. Would better stage our young D.

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk
JohnnyTitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2018, 09:11 PM   #44
Doc Hudson
Scoring Winger
 
Doc Hudson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Amherst, MA
Exp:
Default

Another dumb question.

Does Kulak being waived prior to his arbitration case during contract negotiations have any bearing on the current situation?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
Doc Hudson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2018, 09:13 PM   #45
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Hudson View Post
Another dumb question.

Does Kulak being waived prior to his arbitration case during contract negotiations have any bearing on the current situation?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
More than 30 days have passed. (Or whatever the timeline is)
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2018, 09:21 PM   #46
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Long term asset management and protecting depth says both young defensemen down.

But. If they want to win in their window they may go a different route and promote one of each young dmen and forward to a) make their team better later this year once they get established and b) next year and onwards through the window.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2018, 11:12 PM   #47
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdonkey View Post
Is there an NHL team out there that would seriously consider claiming Rittich on waivers with the intent of keeping him on the main roster?

Edmonton if their no-name Euro backup fizzles?
A goalie analyst on the Fan960 claimed that a lot of goalie coaches around the league like Rittich’s game.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2018, 01:08 AM   #48
Itse
Franchise Player
 
Itse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
It's highly unlikely that Rittich gets claimed.

Always remember that when you claim a player, you have to find an NHL roster spot for him for the entire season.
I don't think that's true. You just have to put them on waivers again. Players have been waived and claimed several times over a season.

What you can't do is claim them and trade them.
Itse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2018, 01:26 AM   #49
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Hogstrom, eh?
Sector 7G, sir
Doesn’t ring a bell
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Old 09-29-2018, 03:04 AM   #50
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse View Post
I don't think that's true. You just have to put them on waivers again. Players have been waived and claimed several times over a season.

What you can't do is claim them and trade them.
Yeah, the rules don't require a team to keep a claimed player in the NHL, but if they want to keep that player's rights, they do. So, for all intents and purposes, if you put in a waiver claim, it should be with the expectation that the player will remain on your NHL team for the full season.

The only exception would be if one of a team's goalies has been injured and the team claims another goalie off waivers to cover for the injured goalie until he returns, with the intention of waiving the claimed goalie once the injured goalie returns.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2018, 03:21 AM   #51
Inferno
Franchise Player
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse View Post
What you can't do is claim them and trade them.
You can trade him but his rights have to first be offered to the other team(s) that put in a claim for him. If they pass on him you can then trade him.

From the CBA PDF:

Quote:
(b) A Player who has been acquired by Waiver claim shall not be Traded to another Club until the termination of Playoffs of the season in which he was acquired unless he is first offered on the same terms to the Club(s) that entered a claim when Waivers were requested originally and the offer has been refused.
Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Inferno For This Useful Post:
Old 09-29-2018, 07:31 AM   #52
N26
Scoring Winger
 
N26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Paradise Island, Bahamas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chockfullofgoodness View Post
Haven't had a chance to watch much pre-season. Does Valimaki really look NHL-ready? That would be great.
I don't think he's ready but for his age and experience level he's impressively close.

Due to that and the aforementioned contract slide situation I am sure he gets sent down and plays less than 10 NHL games this year. But he's going to play a lot in the AHL and seems like he will be on the team next year.

I think Andersson is more ready. And Kylington has moved another step closer. With Prout as insurance I think Treliving needs to look at moving one of Kulak or Stone this year for whatever assets he can get. Maybe around the 20 game mark when he can assess how Andersson is handling the big time and if there are any injury concerns. Probably closer to the trade deadline. Unless of course we are looking like a top contender then you need everybody or you end up in a Brennan Evans situation.

Next year our 7 may well be Gio-Brodie-Hamonic-Hanifin-Andersson-Valimaki-Kylington.

I like it.
N26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2018, 08:50 AM   #53
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

I think Valimaki does look like he could handle the NHL right now. However, there are 2 reasons, IMO, why it doesn't make sense:

1) While not everyone needs AHL time to develop, defensemen can almost certainly benefit from it. As a 21 year old (will be next week) with no pro games under his belt, playing all situations, and learning how to be a pro, will benefit him.

2) There are plenty of other options. He looks great. But he isn't better than Andersson or Prout or Kulak. To stay at his age, he needs to be clearly better, where we say the team is better off with him in the lineup. And I just don't think you can say that yet.

The AHL will actually help Vlaimaki. And we don't need him yet. So no point in forcing things.

Conversely, Dube improves the lineup. And he could play wing without being a negative to him or the team, which would allow him to learn the pro game on the fly.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2018, 08:55 AM   #54
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N26 View Post
I don't think he's ready but for his age and experience level he's impressively close.

Due to that and the aforementioned contract slide situation I am sure he gets sent down and plays less than 10 NHL games this year. But he's going to play a lot in the AHL and seems like he will be on the team next year.

I think Andersson is more ready. And Kylington has moved another step closer. With Prout as insurance I think Treliving needs to look at moving one of Kulak or Stone this year for whatever assets he can get. Maybe around the 20 game mark when he can assess how Andersson is handling the big time and if there are any injury concerns. Probably closer to the trade deadline. Unless of course we are looking like a top contender then you need everybody or you end up in a Brennan Evans situation.

Next year our 7 may well be Gio-Brodie-Hamonic-Hanifin-Andersson-Valimaki-Kylington.

I like it.
Leafs are contenders in the East, but the right side of their D is highly suspect. Frolik, Stone, Rittich, and a 1st for Nylander and McElhinney (or Sparks)?

Then you would have:

Gaudreau-Monahan-Lindholm
Tkachuk-Backlund-Nylander
Bennett-Ryan-Neal (or Neal on his natural left side and do Neal-Bennett-Ryan)
Dube-Jankowski-Czarnik

Giordano-Brodie
Hanifin-Hamonic
Kulak (or Valimaki)-Andersson

Smith
McElhinney
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2018, 08:58 AM   #55
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Hanifin (21) - Valimaki (20)
Kylington (21) - Andersson (22)

Lots to build around there. And 3 and a half seasons from now, their average age will be less what Kulak's is today.

Last edited by Enoch Root; 09-29-2018 at 09:34 AM.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2018, 09:12 AM   #56
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Hanifin (21) - Valimaki (21)
Kylington (21) - Andersson (22)

Lots to build around there. And 3 and a half seasons from now, their average age will be about what Kulak's is today.
I don't understand what those numbers are.
How come Hanafin doesn't age, but Valimaki does?

I think I understand what you're saying though.
All four of them are quite a bit younger than Kulak. I'd argue that they all have greater upside as well.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2018, 09:21 AM   #57
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Valimaki turns 21 in a week. And Andersson turns 22 later in October. So it seemed disingenuous to call them 20 and 21.

Not only do they all have more upside than Kulak, I would argue that by the end of this year at the latest, they will all be better than Kulak. I think Andersson is now, and Valimaki is debatable.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2018, 09:23 AM   #58
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Shazam For This Useful Post:
Old 09-29-2018, 09:26 AM   #59
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Valimaki turns 21 in a week. And Andersson turns 22 later in October. So it seemed disingenuous to call them 20 and 21.

Not only do they all have more upside than Kulak, I would argue that by the end of this year at the latest, they will all be better than Kulak. I think Andersson is now, and Valimaki is debatable.
Valimaki turns 20 in a week.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Shazam For This Useful Post:
Old 09-29-2018, 09:33 AM   #60
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Oh #### yes. No wonder you were confused. I will correct my post. Thanks.

SO the Homer firing was directed at me? lol
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:32 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy