Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-09-2018, 11:16 AM   #81
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc View Post
Lindholm and Ryan are both right shots, and I expect that Lindholm will get PP1 time and Ryan will get PP2 time as a result.
As is Czarnik. And they’ve talked about giving Czarnik PP time regardless of which line he ends up on. So 3 new RH PP options to replace Brouwer who was our only RH option last season and obviously was not a big producer.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2018, 10:20 AM   #82
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Most of the teams who play in overseas preseason schedules tend to enjoy good seasons. I think this is more beneficial than detractive.
22 examples since 2007

12 teams dropped in standings from previous year after overseas training camp. 9 teams improved and one stayed the same.

Best improvement was last years LA going from 22 to 12 and 2011 NYR from 18 to 2. These were the only 2 of the 9 non-playoff teams to have overseas training camp and make the playoffs. LA had Stevens as a 1st year head coach but he was assistant/associate head coach since 2012

On the downside 2009 Florida went from 14 to 28th and 2011 Ducks going from 9th to 25th.

The average is a drop of .818 positions in standings.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2018, 03:02 PM   #83
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Hamilton had a hatty in a game the he was absolutely terrible and didn't seem too worried about anything other than personal stats. Comparing just comparing offensive stats alone never tells the full story.
You mean that meaningless game down the stretch when the Flames desperately needed goals and the offense for the rest of the roster effectively disappeared? Ok...
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2018, 03:29 PM   #84
Redrum
First Line Centre
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
You mean that meaningless game down the stretch when the Flames desperately needed goals and the offense for the rest of the roster effectively disappeared? Ok...

I remember hearing this one before the trade. I don't quite get it. Every Flames player was garbage that game with Hamilton as the lone bright spot. Yet somehow it's still used as an example to spin him in a negative light.
Redrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2018, 09:38 AM   #85
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum View Post
I remember hearing this one before the trade. I don't quite get it. Every Flames player was garbage that game with Hamilton as the lone bright spot. Yet somehow it's still used as an example to spin him in a negative light.
In all fairness there's consistency as some didn't want to call Jankowski a 17 goal scorer because of his 4 in game 82.

Averages include outliers!
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2018, 02:06 PM   #86
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
In all fairness there's consistency as some didn't want to call Jankowski a 17 goal scorer because of his 4 in game 82.

Averages include outliers!
Oh, I call Jankowski a 17 goal scorer. But I still am taking the last game of the season with a grain of salt.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2018, 03:59 PM   #87
Party Elephant
First Line Centre
 
Party Elephant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Montréal, QC
Exp:
Default

The flipside to the Jankowski argument is that he spent the first month of the season in the AHL so he could have scored 4 goals in that time had he been up in the NHL.
Party Elephant is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Party Elephant For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2018, 04:08 PM   #88
Redrum
First Line Centre
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
In all fairness there's consistency as some didn't want to call Jankowski a 17 goal scorer because of his 4 in game 82.

Averages include outliers!

I kind of get that, but that's not what I mean. It's the talk about him being terrible defensively that night in particular. As if he was worse than any other d-man that night.


Also: "didn't seem too worried about anything other than personal stats." Where can I get a mind reading hat? Just sounds like more of that smear campaign or grasping at straws to further justify the trade is all.
Redrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2018, 04:56 PM   #89
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum View Post
I kind of get that, but that's not what I mean. It's the talk about him being terrible defensively that night in particular. As if he was worse than any other d-man that night.


Also: "didn't seem too worried about anything other than personal stats." Where can I get a mind reading hat? Just sounds like more of that smear campaign or grasping at straws to further justify the trade is all.
I've never seen it tabulated but Amber from TSN was suggesting Hamilton let Giordano hustle back for the puck way more than the 50% that most pairings would strive for.

If that was the case, and players noticed it ... potential issue.

I certainly didn't count though.

Does it matter? Not a whole lot. But if you have a few of these things I'd guess it would start to build in a dressing room.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2018, 10:52 PM   #90
Vox
Scoring Winger
 
Vox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
I've never seen it tabulated but Amber from TSN was suggesting Hamilton let Giordano hustle back for the puck way more than the 50% that most pairings would strive for.

If that was the case, and players noticed it ... potential issue.

I certainly didn't count though.

Does it matter? Not a whole lot. But if you have a few of these things I'd guess it would start to build in a dressing room.
Was going to post this in another thread, but maybe this is a better place. I saw these charts in an Athletic article comparing Hanifin's progress over the last two years. Out of curiosity I ran them for Hamilton's last two years and was shocked to see that nearly every metric for Hamilton dropped last year compared to previous years. The only exceptions relate to personal shot attempts. Even looking at counting stats, goals are up last year but assists and points are down.

Was curious to see if the smarter analytics crowd had any insight to this. Was also curious if this change began part way through the year when Freddie was traded. I recall comments that Dougie played some of his best hockey after the trade, but the stats imply to me (who knows nothing about analytics) that he became much more focused on his own goals and less on the team. Perhaps he turned his back on the team a little?

I'd love the perspectives of the analytics savvy posters such as Bingo.

Vox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 12:29 AM   #91
FlamesFanTrev
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
You mean that meaningless game down the stretch when the Flames desperately needed goals and the offense for the rest of the roster effectively disappeared? Ok...
Probably not the right post to quote, but on Hamilton, I wonder if any of the photobombs that we, as fans, found endearing, bugged the players being bombed? I mean, if there was any issues in the dressing room, is this something that turned the volume up on those issues? We saw it as Hamilton busting out of his shell, but is it possible the players being interviewed felt stepped on or one upped? Right after Freddie was traded, those photo bombs stopped. Kinda a chicken and egg scenario.
FlamesFanTrev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 12:39 AM   #92
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

The only two things that concern me from an individual standpoint are Brodie and Smith.

We'll need both to play at least at a decent level consistently to win games. Gio can't be dragging around the Brodie we saw last season, so he will need to elevate his play. Smith needs to hover around .916-.920 and we're probably safe. The rest of the roster either isn't a concern cause we know what they'll bring or won't need to play out of their minds evert night for the team to get results, thanks to the injected depth. We're allowed a bit of inconsistency from this or that guy up front when there are more skilled players that can be feeling it at any given time.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 07:55 AM   #93
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Smith doesn't really concern me, if the workload can be managed. Backup goaltending concerns me. Need a big year from backup position.
What's the right number for Smith to start?
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 09:42 AM   #94
burnitdown
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
The only two things that concern me from an individual standpoint are Brodie and Smith.

We'll need both to play at least at a decent level consistently to win games. Gio can't be dragging around the Brodie we saw last season, so he will need to elevate his play. Smith needs to hover around .916-.920 and we're probably safe. The rest of the roster either isn't a concern cause we know what they'll bring or won't need to play out of their minds evert night for the team to get results, thanks to the injected depth. We're allowed a bit of inconsistency from this or that guy up front when there are more skilled players that can be feeling it at any given time.
Considering Smith only had one season above .916 during his 12 year career, back in 2011/12, a .920 save percentage this year might be ambitious. With the trades and new additions, I think the offense will need to lead us more than D/goaltending this year.
burnitdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 10:17 AM   #95
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
I've never seen it tabulated but Amber from TSN was suggesting Hamilton let Giordano hustle back for the puck way more than the 50% that most pairings would strive for.

If that was the case, and players noticed it ... potential issue.

I certainly didn't count though.

Does it matter? Not a whole lot. But if you have a few of these things I'd guess it would start to build in a dressing room.
With my anti-Hamilton bias I was surprised at how few goals against he was highlighted as being at fault.

No stats to back this up but my slant on it was that he was so far out of the play that his d-partner or back-checking forward was left out to dry and looked at fault when they were forced into making plays that Hamilton would have been responsible for had he read the play correctly and/or hustled back into the play.

Brodie has never been able to take time off from getting back hard into the defense zone as he has always been the best/fastest skater on his defense pair and is obviously counted on to get back into the defense play from deep in the offensive zone. Not excusing him but it made him look extra bad when his mistakes resulted in goals. He was always close enough to be in the play.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 10:18 AM   #96
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vox View Post
Was going to post this in another thread, but maybe this is a better place. I saw these charts in an Athletic article comparing Hanifin's progress over the last two years. Out of curiosity I ran them for Hamilton's last two years and was shocked to see that nearly every metric for Hamilton dropped last year compared to previous years. The only exceptions relate to personal shot attempts. Even looking at counting stats, goals are up last year but assists and points are down.

Was curious to see if the smarter analytics crowd had any insight to this. Was also curious if this change began part way through the year when Freddie was traded. I recall comments that Dougie played some of his best hockey after the trade, but the stats imply to me (who knows nothing about analytics) that he became much more focused on his own goals and less on the team. Perhaps he turned his back on the team a little?

I'd love the perspectives of the analytics savvy posters such as Bingo.

I've been humming and hawing on this for weeks. The second you try and dissect Hamilton it looks like you're trying to bring him down to justify a trade - which never looks great.

I saw that comparison as well. In fact I approached the author to discuss his counting methods on the defensive side of the puck. Was that an on ice event? Or an individual event? I was expecting it to be on ice, but he did in fact count events that involved the individual.

What does it say?

Hamilton is an elite pucks to the net defenseman, something that makes it all the more criminal that he had to watch the #1 powerplay unit for up to three months last season. No idea how that happened or could happen. He gets pucks to the net. This does two things ... 1) it creates offence because he's getting it through that first wall of defense consistently which takes talent and 2) plays a huge active role in creating his own positive corsi numbers and for that of his linemates.

His assists were down from his shot attempts this season, which I'm not sure you can hang on him. That could say he was upping the number of muffins that got into the slot which didn't create rebounds or scoring chances. Or it could say he was victim of the Flame's collectively terrible shooting percentage that went on all season. Probably a bit of both.

The rest? Above average but not elite. His entry and exit stats are more second pairing by the looks of it, and overall his shot attempts seem to push him further up the list when it comes to analytics than his play perhaps would dictate; all of that prefaced on the counting stats of another that I certainly can't validate in any way.

The eye test? I think we all see why his counting stats are high because he shoots all the time. As I said above this is an elite skill and it's effective as hell at creating offence, but it's also a very good way to get your corsi stats up through the roof. But other than that I honestly can't say I ever viewed Hamilton as a shut down guy, a crease clearer, or an end to end rusher. Many of the other roles of a defenseman he wasn't all that noticeable as dominant.

Noah Hanifin


Gets more interesting when you see Hamilton's 17/18 season against Noah Hanifin.

This isn't an eye test for me, I haven't seen Hanifin enough.

But simple data suggests last season, Hanifin was inferior to Hamilton in shot metrics, though said inferiority is actually stronger in counts than the percentiles for the rest of Hamilton's game so it's not like he was weak.

Hanifin is elite or approaching elite on controlled entries and exits ... the guy can keep the puck and just skate by people which is a pretty exciting 200 foot add to a team that is looking to play with more speed.

Defensively he's not dynamo, which is expected at his age, but he doesn't give up lot in comparison to Hamilton on the same measures.

Finally ... why did Hamilton take a step back last season, your original question. Seems to me the best way to maybe not answer that question, but at least bring relevant data into the discussion is a similar year over year look at Giordano. If his numbers eroded the same way it could be a change in style, or the pairing suffering together.

Mark Giordano



Same up tick in shot attempts. Improvement or stays the same in other categories.

So yeah I think you could suggest that Hamilton pushed the envelope somewhat offensively last season.

Either way interesting thing to look at, and it's added a little more excitement to Hanifin as well.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 08-12-2018, 02:58 PM   #97
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
Smith doesn't really concern me, if the workload can be managed. Backup goaltending concerns me. Need a big year from backup position.
What's the right number for Smith to start?
Four back-to-back series on the road, so, Smith should start all of the road games except for four of those games, so 37 road games. Add half of the home games (he was much better on the road last season, and he boosts the team's chances of winning on the road), or 20, and you get a total of 57. Sounds about right to me.

That leaves 35 games for the backup, which is a lot to ask, but at the same time, it minimizes the chance of injury and avoids overworking an ageing goalie.

It does make you wonder if Treliving is looking for a more experienced backup. On the other hand, that would also perpetuate the logjam that is currently stifling our prospects' development. Rittich would almost certainly have to go the other way in any trade.
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 03:02 PM   #98
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc View Post
Four back-to-back series on the road, so, Smith should start all of the road games except for four of those games, so 37 road games. Add half of the home games (he was much better on the road last season, and he boosts the team's chances of winning on the road), or 20, and you get a total of 57. Sounds about right to me.

That leaves 35 games for the backup, which is a lot to ask, but at the same time, it minimizes the chance of injury and avoids overworking an ageing goalie.

It does make you wonder if Treliving is looking for a more experienced backup. On the other hand, that would also perpetuate the logjam that is currently stifling our prospects' development. Rittich would almost certainly have to go the other way in any trade.
You mean 25 games.

The range should be around 52-60 games for Smith and 30-22 games for the backup. We should expect the backup to win at least half of his games. Otherwise, Smith will be forced to start more games.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 03:04 PM   #99
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
You mean 25 games.

The range should be around 52-60 games for Smith and 30-22 games for the backup. We should expect the backup to win at least half of his games. Otherwise, Smith will be forced to start more games.
Whoops, how embarrassing!
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2018, 03:14 PM   #100
Duffalufagus
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Parkdale
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto-matic View Post
I don't see the flames keeping many vet players here in Calgary during the training camp. Most likely the opening day roster will be in China IMO.

The first couple preseason games in Calgary will probably feature a bunch of PTO's and farm players we'll never see in Flames uniforms anyways.
you'll still pay full price for the (season) ticket, though...
Duffalufagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy