08-02-2018, 02:44 PM
|
#201
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelino
Hopefully Smith can go a full season without a major injury. Need one of the backups to breakout as well. Still worried about the goaltending position on this team.
|
Provided this staff isn't dense enough to run a 37 year old goalie with an injury history to the point of exhaustion like last season, the team will be fine in net. If neither Gillies or Rittich appear ready to provide 20-25 starts this year you've got to look into a trade as it is the only real question mark at this point.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 02:45 PM
|
#202
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanCharles
Brouwer and Raymond have been the two contracts I hated the most under Treliving and it was instant hate. I kinda hated Engelland at first but he won me over, I knew nothing about him at the time so it was an uninformed hate.
The other two I knew would never work out unfortunately but no GM is perfect.
|
Funny I see Bouma as the biggest screw up.
The Flames under Treliving looked like a rebuild that needed to find good people to fill out the team and get them to the cap floor at the time. Adding Engelland, Hiller and Raymond made sense. They're weren't huge in term or dollars and they fit what they were trying to limp along doing.
Engelland turned out way better than just a locker room guy, Hiller was good for one year. Raymond did a face plant. But they all made sense.
Brouwer was a mistake but it made sense when you think of the lack of RWs and the fact that they wanted to add to the room and experience. If the Flames didn't give him 4 years $18M I'm guessing some other team would have been pretty close.
The Bouma over pay off of a career year was a head scratcher. Made my skin crawl that day. He got "Backlunded"
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-02-2018, 03:17 PM
|
#203
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Enemy territory
Exp:  
|
Wouldn't surprise me if Brouwer signed with Van or the Yotes.
Last edited by FlameX; 08-02-2018 at 03:20 PM.
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 03:20 PM
|
#204
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sec206
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameX
|
Not really.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to theslymonkey For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-02-2018, 03:25 PM
|
#205
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Funny I see Bouma as the biggest screw up.
The Flames under Treliving looked like a rebuild that needed to find good people to fill out the team and get them to the cap floor at the time. Adding Engelland, Hiller and Raymond made sense. They're weren't huge in term or dollars and they fit what they were trying to limp along doing.
Engelland turned out way better than just a locker room guy, Hiller was good for one year. Raymond did a face plant. But they all made sense.
Brouwer was a mistake but it made sense when you think of the lack of RWs and the fact that they wanted to add to the room and experience. If the Flames didn't give him 4 years $18M I'm guessing some other team would have been pretty close.
The Bouma over pay off of a career year was a head scratcher. Made my skin crawl that day. He got "Backlunded"
|
IIRC wasn't it an arbitration case?
Nevermind, found it. It followed an arbitration hearing, but rather than wait for the settlement, Treliving signed him to a deal. It was probably to head off a 1 year deal that was more expensive than the $2.2 million Bouma received.
This writer had the deal pegged when it was signed though...
https://thehockeywriters.com/lance-b...gree-to-terms/
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 03:25 PM
|
#206
|
Franchise Player
|
I wonder what % of Hanifin jerseys at the Dome will be spelled wrong
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Geeoff For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-02-2018, 03:26 PM
|
#207
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelino
Hopefully Smith can go a full season without a major injury. Need one of the backups to breakout as well. Still worried about the goaltending position on this team.
|
That's why we have to keep his starts under 60. Hopefully under the title of backup Rittich can continue to do good things and handle 20+. If the team is poised for playoffs then we want Smith as fresh as he can possibly be.
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 03:27 PM
|
#208
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
I'm going to put my conspiracy theory hat on and say this buyout was (also) a negotiating tactic with Hanafin by Tre.
"Look, we really want to get a long-term deal with you done, so we got bought-out Brouwer to give up $2.5M in cap space that we're giving to you instead of a bridge deal. The max cap we have available is $4.7/yr for a 6 year deal.*"
* substitute the actual/correct numbers where required.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to shadowlord For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-02-2018, 03:37 PM
|
#209
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Calaway Park
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Fan #751
Buyout now isn't a bad idea. You save $3 million this season and $3 million next season. Then you lose $1.5 million in cap hit in 20-21 but that's probably a lockout year. After that, it's just one more year of losing cap hit.
|
Plus, if you present value the years 3 and 4 based on an expected growth in the salary cap, it is actually even less significant in those years.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Plaedo For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-02-2018, 03:37 PM
|
#210
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowlord
I'm going to put my conspiracy theory hat on and say this buyout was (also) a negotiating tactic with Hanafin by Tre.
"Look, we really want to get a long-term deal with you done, so we got bought-out Brouwer to give up $2.5M in cap space that we're giving to you instead of a bridge deal. The max cap we have available is $4.7/yr for a 6 year deal.*"
* substitute the actual/correct numbers where required.
|
I don't think it was even a conspiracy.
Just talk to Hanifin's agent and at some point say look ... we have room for a bridge, but if you move to this we will buy Brouwer out and lock him up.
Having to actually buy out a player makes the process a lot more sticky than just saying you have no more room.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-02-2018, 03:37 PM
|
#211
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowlord
I'm going to put my conspiracy theory hat on and say this buyout was (also) a negotiating tactic with Hanafin by Tre.
"Look, we really want to get a long-term deal with you done, so we got bought-out Brouwer to give up $2.5M in cap space that we're giving to you instead of a bridge deal. The max cap we have available is $4.7/yr for a 6 year deal.*"
* substitute the actual/correct numbers where required.
|
^ Careful, I put my conspiracy theory hat on one time without realizing that the lizard people had washed it at night (and dried on high heat) and it had shrunk so tight, I haven't been able to remove it.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to puckedoff For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-02-2018, 03:41 PM
|
#212
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames
That's why we have to keep his starts under 60. Hopefully under the title of backup Rittich can continue to do good things and handle 20+. If the team is poised for playoffs then we want Smith as fresh as he can possibly be.
|
Smith has played 60+ twice in the last eight years. Between Rittich and Gillies, they need to play at least 30 if Calgary is to make the playoffs.
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 03:48 PM
|
#213
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
Smith has played 60+ twice in the last eight years. Between Rittich and Gillies, they need to play at least 30 if Calgary is to make the playoffs.
|
Smith is our only weak link in this roster at this point. Mediocre goalie will likely be the reason flames don't win the division.
Either Rittich or Gilles needs to bottle lightning if this team is going deep
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Boy Wonder For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-02-2018, 04:15 PM
|
#214
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boy Wonder
Smith is our only weak link in this roster at this point. Mediocre goalie will likely be the reason flames don't win the division.
Either Rittich or Gilles needs to bottle lightning if this team is going deep
|
You're right, I can't find any other weakness either. Now Smith might not be getting as much work per game played, as I suspect that this lineup will be possession monsters.
I'd like to give at least every 2nd home game to whoever wins the backup role. Smith seems more comfortable on the road, so give him all the road dates that aren't back to back.
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 04:25 PM
|
#215
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus
Provided this staff isn't dense enough to run a 37 year old goalie with an injury history to the point of exhaustion like last season, the team will be fine in net. If neither Gillies or Rittich appear ready to provide 20-25 starts this year you've got to look into a trade as it is the only real question mark at this point.
|
I'm not so sure they did.
I think the Flames were iffy early and Smith was dominant so they rode him. Lack was scaring the hell out of them in practice so they were stuck. But when Rittich got his footing I think they were pretty good on the rotation.
Dude tweaked his hip on a routine play, not sure it had anything to do with minutes.
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 04:25 PM
|
#216
|
Franchise Player
|
The posters who continuously harp that the Flames never give their youth opportunities need to look at this move (along with other things the Flames have done in the past) and stop with that view.
They literally are going to pay a player to not play for the team to make room for other players to compete for a spot. Still up to the players to win the spot but the team is certainly leaving doors open.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-02-2018, 04:26 PM
|
#217
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: next door to Borat
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
This is really easy.
Three captains:
C - Giordano
A - Monahan
A - Backlund
Four captains:
A - Tkachuk
Five captains:
A - Neal
Done.
|
I've never thought about this until now but why is it that Gaudreau is never in the conversation for a letter?
__________________
Sure, Edmonton sucks, but I don't want Kid Hee-haw and his heiress from la-di-da St. Louis dissing it - that's OUR dumb kid brother, not thiers. -Courtesy of Jammies
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to HockeyKhan For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-02-2018, 04:29 PM
|
#218
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I'm not so sure they did.
I think the Flames were iffy early and Smith was dominant so they rode him. Lack was scaring the hell out of them in practice so they were stuck. But when Rittich got his footing I think they were pretty good on the rotation.
Dude tweaked his hip on a routine play, not sure it had anything to do with minutes.
|
Man, acquiring Lack was my least favourite move by Tre. Sure, there wasn't any cap implications like a Brouwer, it was low risk, but man was that a complete waste of time and energy. One of the most useless acquisitions I can think of in recent memory.
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 04:30 PM
|
#219
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyKhan
I've never thought about this until now but why is it that Gaudreau is never in the conversation for a letter?
|
Part of the reason I wouldn't really consider him is that he and Monahan play together all the time. Part of the practical function of the letters is to designate which players get to talk to the referees, so you generally want them to not always be on at the same time.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Superfraggle For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-02-2018, 04:33 PM
|
#220
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I'm not so sure they did.
I think the Flames were iffy early and Smith was dominant so they rode him. Lack was scaring the hell out of them in practice so they were stuck. But when Rittich got his footing I think they were pretty good on the rotation.
Dude tweaked his hip on a routine play, not sure it had anything to do with minutes.
|
Such a crazy play. Going from a missed empty to the play coming down and the goalie getting injured with barely any time on the clock. Just a weird series of events where the hockey gods were messing with flames fans.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM.
|
|