Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-04-2018, 09:32 PM   #11541
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick View Post
I'm shocked there are people who are saying that Hamilton is too much of a liability defensively but are preaching patience with Bennett. Hamilton is 24 years old and doing quite well learning the game as a defenceman. He certainly has accomplished a lot more at his position in 4 NHL seasons.
Just so we are clear. You're shocked that that is the drum the media has been banging about Hamilton for two years now?

I mean fans are saying it too and they all have a point. Hamilton takes lazy penalties. Perhaps he is misunderstood character wise but he really hasn't helped change that specific narrative either.

As for Bennett who is two years younger, why wouldn't you give more rope to him?

And if you're looking to hang people who want him traded because he sucks or they think he sucks, you're gonna be left holding on to that noose for a while.

I think people are saying that the player thats going to return the best value to help the team become better over all is none other than Dougie Hamilton. Only others that can fetch a similar return are far more locked into this core than Dougie.

Truth is, the Flames may take a dip in defensive point production if Dougie is traded but thats going to balance out the forward production where it should be better overall in terms of points and wining games.

What the Flames can do without is undisciplined penalties, and the two who commit them the most is Bennett and Hamilton.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-04-2018, 09:39 PM   #11542
Barca
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
I think if Toronto works to solidify their D, it is not at the expense of one of their top forwards.
lol wat? Marner is not one of their top forwards?
Barca is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 10:05 PM   #11543
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

An intriguing target for a trade is Kyle Palmieri. RH shot RW. Pure goal-scorer. Speed. PP specialist. He wouldn't come cheap, as he's the Devils' top RW and a popular hometown boy. But he'd tick a lot of boxes. And he's only 27.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is online now  
Old 05-04-2018, 10:08 PM   #11544
The Boy Wonder
First Line Centre
 
The Boy Wonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
An intriguing target for a trade is Kyle Palmieri. RH shot RW. Pure goal-scorer. Speed. PP specialist. He wouldn't come cheap, as he's the Devils' top RW and a popular hometown boy. But he'd tick a lot of boxes. And he's only 27.
I actually really wouldn’t mind him as a pickup. Would definitely cost Brodie + fox

That would be fair value imo
The Boy Wonder is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 10:26 PM   #11545
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barca View Post
lol wat? Marner is not one of their top forwards?
You must have misunderstood. No, of course he is. What I was saying is I don’t think Toronto is going to trade a top forward to improve their D.
DeluxeMoustache is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 10:27 PM   #11546
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
I don't think they trade Marner for Hamilton straight up.
1st pairing defencemen are typically worth more than wingers. NHL trade history says so.

Don’t think Treliving will trade Hamilton 1 for 1. If we do deal him it will be for multiple A level assets IMO, 2-3. Otherwise you don’t deal him, we certainly aren’t desperate to move him
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 10:35 PM   #11547
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
1st pairing defencemen are typically worth more than wingers. NHL trade history says so.

Don’t think Treliving will trade Hamilton 1 for 1. If we do deal him it will be for multiple A level assets IMO, 2-3. Otherwise you don’t deal him, we certainly aren’t desperate to move him
Value is related to team need as well. Toronto won’t be calling for Hamilton unless it’s cheap. Which it won’t be.

They won’t move Marner.
Weitz is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 10:41 PM   #11548
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick View Post
I'm shocked there are people who are saying that Hamilton is too much of a liability defensively but are preaching patience with Bennett. Hamilton is 24 years old and doing quite well learning the game as a defenceman. He certainly has accomplished a lot more at his position in 4 NHL seasons.
I’m not sure anyone is saying Hamilton is too much of a defensive liability to keep.

What I would say is that Hamilton’s compete level in his own zone may mean he’s not untouchable. Don’t think the Flames are actively trying to move him. Haven’t seen many posters that are of that opinion either.

My opinion is that it’d be fine to keep him. But if someone blows Treliving’s socks off and offers a 1st line forward plus a 1st rounder and/or top prospect because that team is desperate for a top pairing RH dman then maybe you listen.

I think everyone outside of Ricardo thinks Hamikton is worth a ton. Some people want to keep him which I understand. But I can also see a scenario in which a desperate team offers a boatload of value for him. At that point I don’t think Treliving sticks his fingers in his ears. He listens and if he can improve the team overall by dealing Hamilton then you have to consider it.

What would it take to consider moving Hamilton? A ton. We won’t be giving him away. But Hamilton’s value is so high that a desperate team may offer Treliving a ton for him.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 05-04-2018, 10:44 PM   #11549
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

I think you are more likely to see a 1-for-1 trade for Hamilton then a package.

Not that I think he would be traded. I think he stays.
Weitz is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 10:48 PM   #11550
timbit
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
I think you are more likely to see a 1-for-1 trade for Hamilton then a package.

Not that I think he would be traded. I think he stays.
Who, in your opinion, are the potential “ one’s” for Hamilton?
timbit is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 10:52 PM   #11551
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
Value is related to team need as well. Toronto won’t be calling for Hamilton unless it’s cheap. Which it won’t be.

They won’t move Marner.
Fair enough. We don’t need to move Hamilton

But TOR does have a massive need for a top pairing RH defensemen. I’m not convinced they would move Marner either, I suspect he might be nearly untouchable . But would they give up Nylander and a 1st and maybe something else? Maybe that gets it done. Depends how much TOR would value Hamilton.

IMO Hamilton is more valuable than Larsson. Larsson got Hall. Treliving isn’t trading Hamilton for anything less than a package as valuable as Hall+ IMO. If a team is so desperate for Hamilton that they offer a massive value for him, that’s the only scenario he moves IMO. But that isn’t far fetched at all. Some teams are desperate for an offensive RH top pairing dman. Desperation can lead to substantial offers
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 05-04-2018, 10:58 PM   #11552
Saqe
#1 Goaltender
 
Saqe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Considering Dougie was acquired for a first rounder and two seconds, I'd say that's what should be expected as a return.

Yes, he's more established but also carries a bigger price tag. And why is a young, top pairing guy getting traded again? That would be a red flag for any other team for sure.
Saqe is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 11:02 PM   #11553
GoJetsGo
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saqe View Post

Yes, he's more established but also carries a bigger price tag.

He's a young top pairing D-man locked up for under 6 million for several more seasons.

You've got that concern backwards.
GoJetsGo is offline  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to GoJetsGo For This Useful Post:
Old 05-04-2018, 11:11 PM   #11554
Jeff Lebowski
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Exp:
Default

It wouldn't surprise me if Bennett, Hamilton and Fox are moved out for players and draft picks. Probably in a series of moves and for different reasons.

Treliving said as much (in my opinion) during season ending interviews that changes (people other than coach would be held responsible) would come as a result of last season.
Jeff Lebowski is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 11:15 PM   #11555
timbit
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
It wouldn't surprise me if Bennett, Hamilton and Fox are moved out for players and draft picks. Probably in a series of moves and for different reasons.

Treliving said as much (in my opinion) during season ending interviews that changes (people other than coach would be held responsible) would come as a result of last season.
One of those players is not like the others.
timbit is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 11:19 PM   #11556
savemedrzaius
Help, save, whatever.
 
savemedrzaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Fair enough. We don’t need to move Hamilton

But TOR does have a massive need for a top pairing RH defensemen. I’m not convinced they would move Marner either, I suspect he might be nearly untouchable . But would they give up Nylander and a 1st and maybe something else? Maybe that gets it done. Depends how much TOR would value Hamilton.

IMO Hamilton is more valuable than Larsson. Larsson got Hall. Treliving isn’t trading Hamilton for anything less than a package as valuable as Hall+ IMO. If a team is so desperate for Hamilton that they offer a massive value for him, that’s the only scenario he moves IMO. But that isn’t far fetched at all. Some teams are desperate for an offensive RH top pairing dman. Desperation can lead to substantial offers
Larsson for Hall is the greatest trade for CP because you can always use it as a measuring stick even though at the time everyone knew it was horrible trade and now even more so.
savemedrzaius is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to savemedrzaius For This Useful Post:
Old 05-04-2018, 11:19 PM   #11557
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timbit View Post
One of those players is not like the others.
Is it Fox? He is not a NHLer
Is it Bennett? He is a F
Is it Dougie? He is really tall.
DeluxeMoustache is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 11:22 PM   #11558
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timbit View Post
One of those players is not like the others.
What is this supposed to mean? Very little to connect Fox, Bennett & Hamilton.

Let's hear it.
TOfan is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 11:31 PM   #11559
timbit
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
What is this supposed to mean? Very little to connect Fox, Bennett & Hamilton.

Let's hear it.
Are you serious ?

One finished 9th in Norris voting last year. The other 2 are hopefuls with potential. Yes, Bennett is a forward with a ton to prove.
timbit is offline  
Old 05-04-2018, 11:50 PM   #11560
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timbit View Post
Are you serious ?

One finished 9th in Norris voting last year. The other 2 are hopefuls with potential. Yes, Bennett is a forward with a ton to prove.
So what's your point?

Lebowski said it wouldn't surprise him if those three players were moved out, and your response was 'one of those three is not like the others'

Curious to know what your thoughts are, beyond these three sentences.
TOfan is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to TOfan For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy