Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-05-2018, 01:10 PM   #41
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

It makes me sad that so many on CP feel that this is as good as the Flames are going to get.

The extra cap space is targeted to keeping this group together. How the heck do people foster the concept of going after Tavares when Tkachuk will be getting 6-8 M the year after next year?

How are Monahan . Gaudreau, Backlund, Gio, Hamilton, Hamonic, Stone, Smith, Frolik, Bennett, Jankowski and a higher paid Tkachuk go from a bubble team with zero depth and compete to a contender? (as it should be when spending to the cap)

Enough with the long term big bucks contracts until they are justified with some significant success as a team.

I think the Flames need to get rid of all individual performance bonuses and make them team bonuses.

Last season was all Elliot's fault, This season everyone was great except Brouwer and maybe Bennett.

Gutzlan somehow had the team on a spectacular run to make the playoffs (when the team supposedly bought into his system) and a year latter he is the worst coach in the league

This team had virtually no injuries and was never more than a point or 3 above 8th place in the conference.

news flash:

This team is worse than the last full season 2011-12 that Iginla Boumeester Jokinen, Tanguay, Stempniak missed the playoffs with 90 points and a rebuild was pretty much obviously need
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 02:00 PM   #42
jlh2640
First Line Centre
 
jlh2640's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Regina
Exp:
Default

6 year deal at 5.50
jlh2640 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 02:15 PM   #43
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
It makes me sad that so many on CP feel that this is as good as the Flames are going to get.

The extra cap space is targeted to keeping this group together. How the heck do people foster the concept of going after Tavares when Tkachuk will be getting 6-8 M the year after next year?

How are Monahan . Gaudreau, Backlund, Gio, Hamilton, Hamonic, Stone, Smith, Frolik, Bennett, Jankowski and a higher paid Tkachuk go from a bubble team with zero depth and compete to a contender? (as it should be when spending to the cap)

Enough with the long term big bucks contracts until they are justified with some significant success as a team.

I think the Flames need to get rid of all individual performance bonuses and make them team bonuses.

Last season was all Elliot's fault, This season everyone was great except Brouwer and maybe Bennett.

Gutzlan somehow had the team on a spectacular run to make the playoffs (when the team supposedly bought into his system) and a year latter he is the worst coach in the league

This team had virtually no injuries and was never more than a point or 3 above 8th place in the conference.

news flash:

This team is worse than the last full season 2011-12 that Iginla Boumeester Jokinen, Tanguay, Stempniak missed the playoffs with 90 points and a rebuild was pretty much obviously need
OK, but how do you really feel though?
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 03:10 PM   #44
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

$9MM for Tkachuk a 50 point winger? Yeesh.

We all love that kid and personally I think he's the kind you sign long term. Considering he is a 50 point winger with intangibles, you get him 6 or 7 years averaging about 5.5 to 6MM per. His ceiling is probably 30 and 30.
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 04:23 PM   #45
yourbestfriend
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
$9MM for Tkachuk a 50 point winger? Yeesh.

We all love that kid and personally I think he's the kind you sign long term. Considering he is a 50 point winger with intangibles, you get him 6 or 7 years averaging about 5.5 to 6MM per. His ceiling is probably 30 and 30.
FYI he was on pace for almost 30/30 this year playing with Backlund and Frolik
yourbestfriend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 04:52 PM   #46
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
$9MM for Tkachuk a 50 point winger? Yeesh.

We all love that kid and personally I think he's the kind you sign long term. Considering he is a 50 point winger with intangibles, you get him 6 or 7 years averaging about 5.5 to 6MM per. His ceiling is probably 30 and 30.
I think his ceiling is higher, but I don't think he commands much more than you suggest on an extension. He is realistically a very good top-line winger, but for various reasons just does not yet have the numbers to show it.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 05:39 PM   #47
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Pending performance, slightly less than $6.75M for the first x years to align with Johnny's contract to not be higher than him and then potentially a raise for the years that follow the expiration of Johnny's deal.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 05:44 PM   #48
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

I would love for him to sign for max term, but I think he will sign the same term and money contract as Johnny. I can safely say anybody that thinks he will sign for under $6 million is out to lunch
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 08:00 PM   #49
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
uh really? GL
I could be wrong but I feel that Chucky and his agent might ask for money based where they think he will be in a few years.
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2018, 08:48 PM   #50
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

This kid’s at least a 30G guy in my eyes. I honestly don’t even think he has a ceiling, but his floor is at least 30G. Add in that he’s a 20 year old power forward with leadership written all over him, and I think negotiations start at 6M and go from there.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy