Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-27-2018, 09:19 AM   #101
Demetric
Scoring Winger
 
Demetric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
As disappointing as it is to see the Flames not add a big piece, given the prices I'm happy they stood their ground.

Still want Hoffman. Hope they can do something in the summer.

Would like to see how the team does with a different coach before any big "win now" deadline deals as well
Yeah, I think this could be done with Stone going that way. Not sure they wanted to deplete the defensive depth at this time of year.
__________________
Let the Yutes play!
Demetric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 09:26 AM   #102
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

After almost 24 hours to reflect, I think Treliving did a fantastic job. Our team has proven the ability to win, albeit inconsistently. Let's round out size and skill on the bottom six (which he did) and minimize the costs. Also, with Stewart, Stajan, Versteeg, Glass, Hrivik becoming UFA's, and with Shore, Jankowski, and Hathaway coming off contracts and probably not demanding much in increases, the Flames have options.

The question now is, with our depth going into next season, does Calgary qualify Shinkaruk, Poirier and Klimchuk? I think at least one of them, but not all three, will be around next year.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 09:31 AM   #103
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
After almost 24 hours to reflect, I think Treliving did a fantastic job. Our team has proven the ability to win, albeit inconsistently. Let's round out size and skill on the bottom six (which he did) and minimize the costs. Also, with Stewart, Stajan, Versteeg, Glass, Hrivik becoming UFA's, and with Shore, Jankowski, and Hathaway coming off contracts and probably not demanding much in increases, the Flames have options.

The question now is, with our depth going into next season, does Calgary qualify Shinkaruk, Poirier and Klimchuk? I think at least one of them, but not all three, will be around next year.
Klimchuk for sure. Poirier probably not. Shinkaruk is a definite maybe. And I think Wotherspoon might be cut loose (despite a pretty good season - there's just no room).
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 09:34 AM   #104
The Boy Wonder
First Line Centre
 
The Boy Wonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

I think Klimchuk is most likely of poirier shinkaruk and himself to be resigned.

Id imagine the other two won’t get resigned, especially if we have enough prospects graduate to the ahl level, if none of our 4th round + players from this summers draft are going to be in Stockton next year I could potentially see Poirier and shinkaruk get ahl deals.
The Boy Wonder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 09:41 AM   #105
ah123
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boy Wonder View Post
I think Klimchuk is most likely of poirier shinkaruk and himself to be resigned.

Id imagine the other two won’t get resigned, especially if we have enough prospects graduate to the ahl level, if none of our 4th round + players from this summers draft are going to be in Stockton next year I could potentially see Poirier and shinkaruk get ahl deals.


I am expecting Poirier, Klimchuk and/or Shinkaruk to be traded for picks. I can see a rebuilding team being interested in Poirier or Shinkaruk, as a placeholder while their own prospects mature in the AHL
ah123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 09:46 AM   #106
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Slinger View Post
You've said some ridiculous things here but this has to be top 5.

How is Stewart a headcase?
Do you really think Treliving is afraid to fire Gulutzan?
Where do you come up with this nonsense?
He might be a head case. He just shows flashes of brilliance and then goes a half a season playing far below his potential.

6 NHL teams have passed on his erratic play .. They didn't move out the good Stewart they gave up on his bad streaks.

Right now the Flames have Bennett, Jankowski and Ferland that lose confidence, conditioning, or for what ever reason go for long periods where they are not very good hockey players. They are all young and there is hope that they will find a consistent level of play.

Stewart is 30 years old, and appears to be a nice guy well liked by his team-mates (Stajan's role) but his level of play relative to the potential that he shows from time to time is a coach killer.


As this is very likely his last chance at an NHL contract he should be highly motivated, but he has let down numerous teams and coaches.

Last edited by ricardodw; 02-27-2018 at 09:51 AM.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 09:48 AM   #107
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ah123 View Post
I am expecting Poirier, Klimchuk and/or Shinkaruk to be traded for picks. I can see a rebuilding team being interested in Poirier or Shinkaruk, as a placeholder while their own prospects mature in the AHL
I think that’s super wishful thinking. Would love to be wrong but all three are full on first round busts at this point and I only expect the org to give Klimchuk one more season to turn into a depth option in the NHL.
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 09:50 AM   #108
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ah123 View Post
I am expecting Poirier, Klimchuk and/or Shinkaruk to be traded for picks. I can see a rebuilding team being interested in Poirier or Shinkaruk, as a placeholder while their own prospects mature in the AHL
I'd be ecstatic if Poirier or Shinkaruk could return a 7th round pick! But I doubt it.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 09:51 AM   #109
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
He might be a head case. He just shows flashes of brilliance and then goes a half a season playing far below his potential.

6 NHL teams have passed on his erratic play .. They didn't move out the good Stewart they gave up on his bad streaks.

Right now the Flames have Bennett, Jankowski and Ferland that lose confidence, conditioning, or for what ever reason go for long periods where they are not very good hockey players. They are all young and there is hope that they will find a consistent level of play.

Stewart is 30 years old, and appears to be a nice guy well liked by his team-mates (Stajan's role) but his level of play relative to the potential that he shows from time to time is a coach killer.
Inconsistent, and potentially washed up NHLer sure.

Headcase? Sure doesn't sound like it from the weepy good byes in Minnesota.

There's plenty to bash on Chris Stewart without suggesting he's a problem in the dressing room.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 02-27-2018, 09:53 AM   #110
Sutter4Mayor
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Sutter4Mayor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
He might be a head case. He just shows flashes of brilliance and then goes a half a season playing far below his potential.

6 NHL teams have passed on his erratic play .. They didn't move out the good Stewart they gave up on his bad streaks.

Right now the Flames have Bennett, Jankowski and Ferland that lose confidence, conditioning, or for what ever reason go for long periods where they are not very good hockey players. They are all young and there is hope that they will find a consistent level of play.

Stewart is 30 years old, and appears to be a nice guy well liked by his team-mates (Stajan's role) but his level of play relative to the potential that he shows from time to time is a coach killer.
Keep going, son. You're working your way out of it.
Sutter4Mayor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 09:54 AM   #111
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Inconsistent, and potentially washed up NHLer sure.

Headcase? Sure doesn't sound like it from the weepy good byes in Minnesota.

There's plenty to bash on Chris Stewart without suggesting he's a problem in the dressing room.
Problem? In that what strategies do coaches use to get him to play somewhat near his potential.

The locker is full of players that are playing well below their potential (IMO).
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 09:55 AM   #112
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Klimchuk for sure. Poirier probably not. Shinkaruk is a definite maybe. And I think Wotherspoon might be cut loose (despite a pretty good season - there's just no room).
Wotherspoon will be a UFA so it really isn't a decision for the Flames. He'll be gone either way.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 02-27-2018, 09:57 AM   #113
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

I just noticed that Wotherspoon has near identical stats to Rasmus Andersson this season.

If he hasn't made the case to get an NHL contract with another team, I'd be shocked. Perfect season to do it, he becomes UFA on July 1. I'd say there is zero chance he's back next year.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 09:57 AM   #114
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Problem? In that what strategies do coaches use to get him to play somewhat near his potential.

The locker is full of players that are playing well below their potential (IMO).
Not sure you have a point any more.

He was free.

They will either find him rejuvenated or they will scratch him.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 02-27-2018, 10:00 AM   #115
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

I keep opening this thread to see the so called news round-up.. lol
IgiTang is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to IgiTang For This Useful Post:
Old 02-27-2018, 10:13 AM   #116
sa226
#1 Goaltender
 
sa226's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back in Calgary!!
Exp:
Default

Trade deadline gives me an opportunity to look at other teams and see what they have and where they plan to go. Normally I just focus on the Flames.

Given the Flames position in the standings, Darryl Sutters comment on the Backlund line (Really good third line on a cup winning team) and the moves they made yesterday, I will reiterate what I and others have said many times.

The Flames will be stuck spinning their wheels as a good, but not great team until Sam Bennett breaks out. We need the Backlund line to be the 3rd line.

Thats pretty narrow focused about Sam Bennett, so I will expand that thought to include Jankowski as well. Im in favour of moving a dman for more scoring, but then you potentially have cap complications and the return being less than what the team needs. But it is an option.

In the worst way the Flames need another young center, or hell even a winger, on a cheap contract to break out and carry a scoring line.

We may improve the powerplay, get lights out goaltending and perhaps win the division, but until the depth of scoring is addressed, the Flames will be what they will be.

Thats why I like the moves yesterday. Their issues are not going to be solved at the deadline by trading more futures. See what the current group can do, wait for the draft and keep investing in the kids.

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk
sa226 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sa226 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-27-2018, 10:30 AM   #117
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

A lot of you thought that teams like Tampa overpaid when getting big value assets. Meanwhile we have three 2013 first rounders playing in the AHL with amazing junior stats that look as though they will amount to literally nothing in the NHL.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 10:57 AM   #118
ClubFlames
Posted the 2 millionth post!
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
rabble..rabble
You're such a head case.

Sorry, you might be one.

But you're a nice guy.
__________________

ClubFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 11:01 AM   #119
tkflames
First Line Centre
 
tkflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
A lot of you thought that teams like Tampa overpaid when getting big value assets. Meanwhile we have three 2013 first rounders playing in the AHL with amazing junior stats that look as though they will amount to literally nothing in the NHL.
Except that Tampa gave up:
1. Young NHL Players
2. Relatively known quantity prospects
3. Draft Picks.

I don't blame Feaster for the Iginla trade. He tried to get a 1st + Prospect + NHL Player in Bartkowski. That is similar to the Nash package.

I blame Feaster for the return on Bouw. That is a horrible return on a guy with term that did not need to be traded. When you look at what Tampa paid and you think about what Bouw would have been worse coming off an improved season, that trade set the franchise back to the point where we are still feeling it today. How much better would Tatar or Nyquist (as one example) look in Flames silks today?
__________________
Go Flames Go
tkflames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2018, 11:11 AM   #120
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sa226 View Post
Trade deadline gives me an opportunity to look at other teams and see what they have and where they plan to go. Normally I just focus on the Flames.

Given the Flames position in the standings, Darryl Sutters comment on the Backlund line (Really good third line on a cup winning team) and the moves they made yesterday, I will reiterate what I and others have said many times.

The Flames will be stuck spinning their wheels as a good, but not great team until Sam Bennett breaks out. We need the Backlund line to be the 3rd line.

Thats pretty narrow focused about Sam Bennett, so I will expand that thought to include Jankowski as well. Im in favour of moving a dman for more scoring, but then you potentially have cap complications and the return being less than what the team needs. But it is an option.

In the worst way the Flames need another young center, or hell even a winger, on a cheap contract to break out and carry a scoring line.

We may improve the powerplay, get lights out goaltending and perhaps win the division, but until the depth of scoring is addressed, the Flames will be what they will be.

Thats why I like the moves yesterday. Their issues are not going to be solved at the deadline by trading more futures. See what the current group can do, wait for the draft and keep investing in the kids.

Sent from my SM-G950W using Tapatalk
Agreed with this completely, if you are sitting flush with all draft picks. I guess I agree with it anyway, but this is a massive failure of Treliving if this team misses the playoffs.
Flames have no picks because they are already all in. So as long as Treliving trust in making it comes through, all is well.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EldrickOnIce For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:34 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy