Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2018, 05:06 PM   #1
Karl
Franchise Player
 
Karl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default The Hockey News: 31 NHL players who should be better than this

http://www.thehockeynews.com/news/ar...tter-than-this
Karl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2018, 05:15 PM   #2
MoneyGuy
Franchise Player
 
MoneyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Some undervalued players to target in trades?
MoneyGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2018, 05:18 PM   #3
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

I get the Brouwer pick but for the Flames my biggest disappointing player is Bennett.

If he had developed like Mony and Tkachuk did this teams depth scoring wouldnt be nearly as much of an issue.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 02-06-2018, 05:25 PM   #4
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
I get the Brouwer pick but for the Flames my biggest disappointing player is Bennett.

If he had developed like Mony and Tkachuk did this teams depth scoring wouldnt be nearly as much of an issue.
I still proclaim “look at the circumstances”. If Bennett had continued to play with Backlund, I wonder what we’d be saying about him because we were generally pleased with his rookie season as a winger.

He then got fed to the wolves and burdened with the biggest anchors on this team.

Since being removed from Backlund’s wing, the best player he’s played with has been Jankowski - who is a rookie centre. That’s good, and I’m really excited to see them together going forward. It’s just not something we should or can overlook - no other young players in the league get asked to do what Bennett was asked to do at that age. Young players generally get played with better players which allows them to learn and build their game at the NHL level. Bennett got to centre Troy Brouwer, Kris Versteeg, Alex Chiasson. That’s tough sledding for for anyone (Brouwer makes/made Johnny and Sean ineffective), let alone a 1st year centre.

Bennett also shows up in the playoffs, and has shown us glimpses of being a very good forward. Continued patience is required (not that you’re saying it isn’t), because the positives are there.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 02-06-2018, 05:33 PM   #5
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

If Vancouver wants to do a Gagner / Brouwer+ swap....
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2018, 05:48 PM   #6
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Was expecting all Oilers minus McDavid.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2018, 10:19 PM   #7
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
I still proclaim “look at the circumstances”. If Bennett had continued to play with Backlund, I wonder what we’d be saying about him because we were generally pleased with his rookie season as a winger.

He then got fed to the wolves and burdened with the biggest anchors on this team.

Since being removed from Backlund’s wing, the best player he’s played with has been Jankowski - who is a rookie centre. That’s good, and I’m really excited to see them together going forward. It’s just not something we should or can overlook - no other young players in the league get asked to do what Bennett was asked to do at that age. Young players generally get played with better players which allows them to learn and build their game at the NHL level. Bennett got to centre Troy Brouwer, Kris Versteeg, Alex Chiasson. That’s tough sledding for for anyone (Brouwer makes/made Johnny and Sean ineffective), let alone a 1st year centre.

Bennett also shows up in the playoffs, and has shown us glimpses of being a very good forward. Continued patience is required (not that you’re saying it isn’t), because the positives are there.
I love Bennett's grit and toughness but I just don't see the skill level to be a big point producer. His competitiveness helped him will points in junior but in the NHL, you need skill to put up points.

I think Flames fans should just settle for a Mike Fisher type of career for Bennett, which really wouldn't be that bad.

If Bennett can score around 40 points every year and play with grit and toughness, he can still be a big contributor to the team. In fact, he'd probably be the next captain of the Flames after Giordano.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2018, 10:38 PM   #8
JD
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Not Abu Dhabi
Exp:
Default

I'm having troubles seeing what made Bennett a high pick to begin with. He's a tasmanian devil of a competitor, but he's not big and strong, he isn't really fast, he doesn't have reach, his shot is a muffin, and he takes a lot of bad penalties. Maybe this is just the look of a slumping player that has lost his confidence, but I don't really see top 6 out of him. I think he'll have a solid NHL career and probably contribute to his team's successes, but I don't think he will live up to the pedigree. And that's really a shame.

I really hope what I'm seeing is just an aberration.
JD is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JD For This Useful Post:
Old 02-06-2018, 10:47 PM   #9
Eric Vail
First Line Centre
 
Eric Vail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Bennett reminds me of a less feisty Doug Risebrough.
Eric Vail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2018, 12:13 AM   #10
crapshoot
First Line Centre
 
crapshoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sweden
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Vail View Post
Bennett reminds me of a less feisty Doug Risebrough.
You really reached back for that one, didn't you? I like it!

Last edited by crapshoot; 02-07-2018 at 12:20 AM.
crapshoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2018, 10:03 AM   #11
Hockey Fan #751
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Vail View Post
Bennett reminds me of a less feisty Doug Risebrough.
Just don't let him become general manager!
Hockey Fan #751 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockey Fan #751 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-07-2018, 11:06 AM   #12
1Nite
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Vail View Post
Bennett reminds me of a less feisty Doug Risebrough.
Wasn't he supposed to be like another Doug, his GM in Kingston?
1Nite is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 1Nite For This Useful Post:
Old 02-07-2018, 11:20 AM   #13
hansmoleman
Backup Goalie
 
hansmoleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Nite View Post
Wasn't he supposed to be like another Doug, his GM in Kingston?
Was going to say that it never really bothered me that Sam Bonnet isn't going to live to expectations as there wasn't anyone better drafted after him. And then I looked...

Rd Num
1 25 David Pastrnak L 223GP 80G 93A
1 9 Nikolaj Ehlers L 208GP 60G 81A
1 15 Dylan Larkin C 212GP 48G 68A
1 8 William Nylander C 158GP 40G 75A
4 112 Viktor Arvidsson R 191GP 56G 55A
3 79 Brayden Point C 121GP 38G 48A

I would take any of those in a 1-for-1 trade with the exception of maybe Larkin.
__________________
hansmoleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2018, 11:37 AM   #14
DynamRyan
Powerplay Quarterback
 
DynamRyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Berlin, Germany
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Nite View Post
Wasn't he supposed to be like another Doug, his GM in Kingston?


Was gonna say, he reminds me of Killer. Just without the skill and hockey smarts. Same tenacity.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
GO FLAMES GO. That is all.
DynamRyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2018, 12:07 PM   #15
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Brouwer needs to be better, but he is what he is. If he was playing at 1/3 his salary, no one would care.

IMO who belongs on that list are:

a) Sam Bennett
b) TJ Brodie

Both have shown to be much better players in the past. Both have shown flashes this season. Both have had ups and downs. If both play like they have shown they can, the team will be much better.

If Brouwer plays better, does it really affect the team more positively then Bennett or Brodie would? I would say no.
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2018, 12:32 PM   #16
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
I still proclaim “look at the circumstances”. If Bennett had continued to play with Backlund, I wonder what we’d be saying about him because we were generally pleased with his rookie season as a winger.

He then got fed to the wolves and burdened with the biggest anchors on this team.

Since being removed from Backlund’s wing, the best player he’s played with has been Jankowski - who is a rookie centre. That’s good, and I’m really excited to see them together going forward. It’s just not something we should or can overlook - no other young players in the league get asked to do what Bennett was asked to do at that age. Young players generally get played with better players which allows them to learn and build their game at the NHL level. Bennett got to centre Troy Brouwer, Kris Versteeg, Alex Chiasson. That’s tough sledding for for anyone (Brouwer makes/made Johnny and Sean ineffective), let alone a 1st year centre.

Bennett also shows up in the playoffs, and has shown us glimpses of being a very good forward. Continued patience is required (not that you’re saying it isn’t), because the positives are there.

The fact fans are continuously searching for someone to help Bennett out in itself is an indicator he is not the player he was drafted to be. Not even close. I don't think Bennett should be better than this, he is what he is and that's a fringe NHLer that is still living off of his draft status.

Had he been able to develop effectively like some of the other young players in recent years, you'd probably be talking about a much deeper, dangerous Flames team this season. The hole his poor play has created this season is actually costing the Flames big time if you consider how much the staff was banking on him finally panning out. Instead, the team has a third line with Brouwer and Bennett equally deserving of each other as line mates.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit

Last edited by Hot_Flatus; 02-07-2018 at 12:41 PM.
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hot_Flatus For This Useful Post:
Old 02-07-2018, 02:55 PM   #17
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hansmoleman View Post
Was going to say that it never really bothered me that Sam Bonnet isn't going to live to expectations as there wasn't anyone better drafted after him. And then I looked...

Rd Num
1 25 David Pastrnak L 223GP 80G 93A
1 9 Nikolaj Ehlers L 208GP 60G 81A
1 15 Dylan Larkin C 212GP 48G 68A
1 8 William Nylander C 158GP 40G 75A
4 112 Viktor Arvidsson R 191GP 56G 55A
3 79 Brayden Point C 121GP 38G 48A

I would take any of those in a 1-for-1 trade with the exception of maybe Larkin.
Generally when looking back at the draft and if another player should have been selected - I like to look at the picks around 1-5 spots later. For instance it isn't realistic to suggest that the Flames would have drafted someone who went in a later round, with the 5th overall pick. And I know you are saying that but when you apply that lens it really highlights the only guys realistically that would have been options are Nylander (who has a lot of flaws, and Ehlers).

For what its worth I believe the guy they would have taken if not Bennett would have been Nick Ritchie.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 02-07-2018, 03:21 PM   #18
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild GM View Post
Generally when looking back at the draft and if another player should have been selected - I like to look at the picks around 1-5 spots later. For instance it isn't realistic to suggest that the Flames would have drafted someone who went in a later round, with the 5th overall pick. And I know you are saying that but when you apply that lens it really highlights the only guys realistically that would have been options are Nylander (who has a lot of flaws, and Ehlers).

For what its worth I believe the guy they would have taken if not Bennett would have been Nick Ritchie.
I agree, except they might have gone with Nylander since he was supposedly a centre and they were still looking down the middle at that stage. At the time wouldn’t we all have howled if BT bypassed Bennett for anyone on that list. I don’t think Ehlers was in the mix at all.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2018, 03:27 PM   #19
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I agree, except they might have gone with Nylander since he was supposedly a centre and they were still looking down the middle at that stage. At the time wouldn’t we all have howled if BT bypassed Bennett for anyone on that list. I don’t think Ehlers was in the mix at all.
The other thing is that for them not to take Sam, someone else would have dropped. One of Ekblad, Reinhart or Dry-Saddle.

And more than likely that's the guy they would have taken.

Not shaping up as a great draft at the top end. Even Ekblad has been really up and down. Reinhart isn't looking great. Sam is underwhelming. And we don't really know what Leon is yet absent playing with Mayor McCheese
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2018, 04:08 PM   #20
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Hockey News
CALGARY FLAMES: Troy Brouwer
The game has gotten faster, but bump-and-grind Brouwer has not.
Brouwer's skating's probably not even the worst part of his play IMO. He's definitely faster than Matt Stajan at least. :P
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:07 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy