Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-26-2018, 09:59 AM   #6441
mdubz
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beninho View Post
Does Bennett do anything really well? I don’t see any qualities that would make him a very good player in this league. He can’t create very much separation with his speed, has poor offensive awareness, struggles to create, cannot pass, handles the puck like a grenade, can’t stay on his skates, and has the finishing touch of Matt Stajan. Such a big ####ing dissapoitment.
He's really good at taking bone-head penalties.
mdubz is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 10:01 AM   #6442
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
I'd say the Flames' hands are tied at this point. What do you realistically expect Bennett to bring back in a trade? A 2nd rounder seems like the most probable value.

If he's only worth a second rounder. then I think you hold steady and wait for the reckoning, which is the draft + 4 season, next year. It may still be he puts something together to put a 40 point, gritty checking guy like Bonino or Cogliano. That upside is still more attractive than a 2nd rounder and worth the risk if he busts, which i would define as a player than he is now 30 points, useless in most other aspects of the game.
I don't know what he gets you. But I think it is a very different thing if you are moving him for a pick, in which case, you may not get more than a 2nd or a 2nd and 3rd. So in that case - no - not worth it
But trading him for more immediate help, to a team looking to reset the clock on the asset a little more, probably gets you more.

They are two very different scenarios.
Jiri Hrdina is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 10:01 AM   #6443
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Bennett has the high-end ability to make a really nice deke on a defenseman as he comes in to the zone. Then he turns into Matt Lombardi when it comes time to take the actual shot.

The guy just can't seem to finish in this league. Whether that's mental or not, its still a part of who he is, and it doesn't mean it's something one can easily remedy.
Table 5 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2018, 10:42 AM   #6444
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Eklund says we are leading the way on Hoffman
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 10:46 AM   #6445
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Eklund says we are leading the way on Hoffman
That's like the garbage man telling you you're in the top 10 percentile at school.
Ozy_Flame is offline  
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Ozy_Flame For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2018, 10:46 AM   #6446
Monahammer
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Eklund says we are leading the way on Hoffman
This almost guarantees that we won't land him- let's just hope that Eklund's error is in our favour this time and we're actually close to Stone :P
Monahammer is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 11:09 AM   #6447
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

what would you give up for Stone or as a package deal for Stone?

Bennett, Brodie, 2019 first and they take Brouwer for Stone and JGP? or is that just to far out there? Instead of JGP maybe Pyatt or someone else?
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2018, 11:12 AM   #6448
Mass_nerder
Franchise Player
 
Mass_nerder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
what would you give up for Stone or as a package deal for Stone?

Bennett, Brodie, 2019 first and they take Brouwer for Stone and JGP? or is that just to far out there? Instead of JGP maybe Pyatt or someone else?
I would be very hesitant to trade away our 2019 1st.
Not drafting in the top few rounds for more than a year is a good way to cultivate massive holes in organizational depth.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype View Post
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
Mass_nerder is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Mass_nerder For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2018, 11:13 AM   #6449
spennywalks
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

as bad as eklund is he did call the Flames getting Jagr months before it happened.
spennywalks is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 11:18 AM   #6450
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mass_nerder View Post
I would be very hesitant to trade away our 2019 1st.
Not drafting in the top few rounds for more than a year is a good way to cultivate massive holes in organizational depth.
I think you need to give up the pick as part value for Stone and as compensation for for taking Brouwer. I don't think Bennett and Brodie are enough for Stone but adding a first is too much so the Sens take a contract in Brouwer and maybe throw another contract to the Flames.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 11:21 AM   #6451
jonkaupp
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Exp:
Default

As awesome as getting Stone would be, I don’t think it’s in the cards. Senators have no reason to trade him unless they get a big overpayment.
jonkaupp is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 11:21 AM   #6452
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spennywalks View Post
as bad as eklund is he did call the Flames getting Jagr months before it happened.
Even the sun shines on a dogs a$$ every once in a while.
__________________
Wolfman is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 11:22 AM   #6453
Mass_nerder
Franchise Player
 
Mass_nerder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
I think you need to give up the pick as part value for Stone and as compensation for for taking Brouwer. I don't think Bennett and Brodie are enough for Stone but adding a first is too much so the Sens take a contract in Brouwer and maybe throw another contract to the Flames.
I wasn't suggesting that Brodie and Bennett would be enough. I think we could probably add a top prospect (Fox, Parsons), instead, and just forget about trying to get them to take Brouwer.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype View Post
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
Mass_nerder is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Mass_nerder For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2018, 11:24 AM   #6454
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Ya, I agree about trading the first but if they wouldn't budge, I would give it for Stone as he'd be perfect on the team and the kind of guy you hope your pick turns into. I would add Fox, and I think you're right about no one wanting Brouwer.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 11:26 AM   #6455
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

This team def needs an 80s style shakeup trade. They are not winning anything with this lineup.

It doesn't have to be huge. but sending a few supporting guys that need a change of scenery for a similar group coming the other way would be great. Or use the positional strength to get an important piece. The 4th line has to bring more and the 3rd needs to be consistent. BT has to fix that.

The Calgary - Ottawa rumours make a lot of sense.

I guess we'll see what happens next week.
Badgers Nose is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 11:29 AM   #6456
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Re: Eklund

Pretty sure half this board called Jagr to the Flames before it happened too.

Blind squirrel, nuts, etc.
Toonage is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 11:55 AM   #6457
Monahammer
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

I would move the 2019 1st for Stone- he's young enough and extendable to fill the perceived Gap. That would be the last one i'd move though.

If it takes Brodie + Bennett+ 1st I think you have to do it. ~ppg player, young, big, very defensively responsible, great possession numbers, and a RHS. He's exactly what we need.
Monahammer is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Monahammer For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2018, 11:56 AM   #6458
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
I would move the 2019 1st for Stone- he's young enough and extendable to fill the perceived Gap. That would be the last one i'd move though.

If it takes Brodie + Bennett+ 1st I think you have to do it. ~ppg player, young, big, very defensively responsible, great possession numbers, and a RHS. He's exactly what we need.
jg13 is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jg13 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2018, 11:58 AM   #6459
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
I would move the 2019 1st for Stone- he's young enough and extendable to fill the perceived Gap. That would be the last one i'd move though.

If it takes Brodie + Bennett+ 1st I think you have to do it. ~ppg player, young, big, very defensively responsible, great possession numbers, and a RHS. He's exactly what we need.
come on now

Adam Larsson was traded for Taylor Hall
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline  
Old 01-26-2018, 11:58 AM   #6460
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame View Post
That's like the garbage man telling you you're in the top 10 percentile at school.
Garbage man probably makes a nice income with benefits and a pension.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:59 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy