Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-10-2017, 12:04 PM   #4661
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

The anchor contract on that team, for a player that still can play at a pretty high level, is Bogosian. 5.2 million until 2020, back loaded. Right handed shot. He has played the off-side, but that's not how GG rolls.

Buffalo has to be looking at ROR at 7.5 million until 2023 on a non-contending team as a bit of a problem. Eichel kicks in at first line money next year. There is no way ROR is ever moving to the wing again. If this happens, Backlund is as good as gone. But ROR is already under contract for what Backlund will likely command, and ROR (imo) is the better player (but not by much). ROR is 26 years old, but it feels like he's been around forever.

Honestly, Okposo, Kane and Pomminville I would stay far away from. For contract status as much as anything else.

Girgensons!!
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
Harry Lime is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Harry Lime For This Useful Post:
Old 12-10-2017, 12:07 PM   #4662
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

ROR is simply not better than Backlund, but Backlund also won't make nearly as much on his next contract.

Last edited by Ashasx; 12-10-2017 at 09:41 PM.
Ashasx is offline  
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 12-10-2017, 12:19 PM   #4663
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

O'reilly 2 years younger and consistently a higher point producer.

I haven't watched him play much but is Backlund's defensive play high enough that it overshadows these above metrics?
bubbsy is offline  
Old 12-10-2017, 12:23 PM   #4664
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

My dream scenario, that would make everyone here sad that it wasn't more earth shattering....

Girgensons for Lazar and Shinkaruk (or enter project player here).

Girgensons is what we all hoped Lazar would someday become, and Shinkaruk needs somewhere else to play while he still has some residual value. My untouchable Stockton players on forward are Yeast Mode and Klimchuk.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
Harry Lime is offline  
Old 12-10-2017, 12:24 PM   #4665
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
ROR is simply not better than Backlund, but Backlumd also won't make nearly as much on his next contract.
Really? ROR > Backlund.

But i prefer Backlund because he’ll be 33% cheaper on his contract.
ForeverFlameFan is offline  
Old 12-10-2017, 12:25 PM   #4666
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
O'reilly 2 years younger and consistently a higher point producer.

I haven't watched him play much but is Backlund's defensive play high enough that it overshadows these above metrics?
O'Reilly is a solid 2-way player. Not Backlund/Bergeron, but top quarter of the league easily.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
Harry Lime is offline  
Old 12-10-2017, 12:27 PM   #4667
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime View Post
My dream scenario, that would make everyone here sad that it wasn't more earth shattering....



Girgensons is what we all hoped Lazar would someday become,
Haha.

I have to laugh at this seeing as Lazar is all of 22 years old and played a grand total of like 25 games in a Flames uniform.

You make it sound like we've been waiting forever for him to blossom into something.

Patience really doesn't run rampant on the interwebs, or among Canadian fan bases.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 12-10-2017, 12:42 PM   #4668
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Haha.

I have to laugh at this seeing as Lazar is all of 22 years old and played a grand total of like 25 games in a Flames uniform.

You make it sound like we've been waiting forever for him to blossom into something.

Patience really doesn't run rampant on the interwebs, or among Canadian fan bases.
I don't see where there is room on this team for a blossoming Lazar. Ferland and Hathaway have taken those spots on the RW and Bennett is an emergency centre.

The one thing that the Flames need, is a solid fourth line centre, who is farther along in development. Lazar will likely get there, but why wait a solid year for it when we can close that gap sooner?

Buffalo has lots of space for Lazar to develop, IMO the Flames really don't. Their window starts this year.

Also, with Magnipane and Klimchuk coming on the left, and Hathaway and Ferland on the right, the only spot to fill is centre. If Girgensons can do that better than Lazar, then it's not really an issue of not being patient enough.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
Harry Lime is offline  
Old 12-10-2017, 12:48 PM   #4669
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime View Post
My dream scenario, that would make everyone here sad that it wasn't more earth shattering....

Girgensons for Lazar and Shinkaruk (or enter project player here).

Girgensons is what we all hoped Lazar would someday become, and Shinkaruk needs somewhere else to play while he still has some residual value. My untouchable Stockton players on forward are Yeast Mode and Klimchuk.
I would prefer to keep Lazar. He’s been playing pretty good as of late. I see him as a permanent bottom 6 C/RW.

Brouwer/Shinkaruk for Girgensons/Moulson would be ideal.
ForeverFlameFan is offline  
Old 12-10-2017, 12:49 PM   #4670
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Wouldn't trade for Girgensons when the Flames may have his equivalent or better in the AHL with Hrivik.
Toonage is offline  
Old 12-10-2017, 01:18 PM   #4671
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

Good points, Toonage and Forever. Forgot about how good Hrivik has been playing.

Still if Forever's scenarioi plays out, having a Girgenson's/Lazar/Hathaway fourth line would make for a very re-vamped fourth line.

There would also be call ups of LW(Klimchuk/Magnipane)C(Hrivik)RW(Moulson) sitting in Stockton, which is nice depth.

I see the fourth as being the Flames Achilles heel at the moment. Buffalo is happy to help.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
Harry Lime is offline  
Old 12-10-2017, 01:37 PM   #4672
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

I really like ROR and I think him and Backlund are comparables. Moving Backlund though... He's been a Flame forever and very obviously bleeds Calgary Flames. Wonder what moving a guy like him does to the room?
activeStick is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
Old 12-10-2017, 02:11 PM   #4673
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

I still say if you get ROR you also keep Backlund.

With the cap going up that much it can be done, and it's clear this team is really wanting to compete for a Cup the next 3 seasons (including this one) before the probable lock out and also when the D will have to be dismantled (Brodie, Hamonic, Stone all UFA and Gio will be 37)


Gaudreau - Monahan - Ferland
R. O'Reilly - Backlund - M Frolik
S Bennett - Jankowski - Tkachuk
M Hrivik - C. Lazar - Hathaway
13th forward

Giordano - Hamilton
TJ Brodie - Hamonic
B. Kulak - M. Stone
7th Dman

Smith
Rittich

Brouwer bought out
$6 million per for Backs
Slight raises for Janko, Hathaway and Kulak
One way for Rittich

You still come in around $75-76 million.

Leaves $4+ million of cap space to boot. Probably don't even have to buy out Brouwer, to be honest.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 12-10-2017, 02:17 PM   #4674
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy View Post
According to some, he died for sins like this trade proposal.
Lol. That actually made me laugh pretty good. Nice one!

Edit: RE the ROR and Girgensons talk, what are we using to acquire these guys if we aren’t sending Buffalo anyone who can help them?

Last edited by IgiTang; 12-10-2017 at 02:19 PM.
IgiTang is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to IgiTang For This Useful Post:
Old 12-10-2017, 03:54 PM   #4675
TheFlamesVan
Retired
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Back in Guelph
Exp:
Default

Not sure how you can be a fan of this organization and not realize how important character is to them. I do not see a situation where they trade Mikael Backlund, who with his wife does tons of charity work in the city, for Ryan "drove into a timmies drunk at 4am" O'Rielly.

Same thing with Hamonic, he isn't going anywhere regardless of the price tag. They have been working on building a team around character since Treliving arrived.

Frolik? The guy is as automatic as they come. He always brings his game.
TheFlamesVan is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TheFlamesVan For This Useful Post:
Old 12-10-2017, 05:13 PM   #4676
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFlamesVan View Post
Not sure how you can be a fan of this organization and not realize how important character is to them. I do not see a situation where they trade Mikael Backlund, who with his wife does tons of charity work in the city, for Ryan "drove into a timmies drunk at 4am" O'Rielly.

Same thing with Hamonic, he isn't going anywhere regardless of the price tag. They have been working on building a team around character since Treliving arrived.

Frolik? The guy is as automatic as they come. He always brings his game.
Backlund could want $6.5M x 8 years which I could easily seemthr Flames walking away from. The Flames need to avoid handing out a deal that long for a player that old. Gio is making big money until he is 39 and the Flames probably want to avoid paying Backlund big money until he is 37.

I recall when the Flames signed RoR the organization was referencing his character. Yes he had the DUI incident but but does that make him a bad person forever moving forward?

I would be really surprised if the Flames went past the trade deadline with Backlun not signed to an extension. They can’t lose an asset like that for nothing. Also if they were in on Turris perhaps that is leverage in the Backlind negotiation or maybe the negotiation has gone poorly?
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 12-10-2017, 05:31 PM   #4677
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFlamesVan View Post
Not sure how you can be a fan of this organization and not realize how important character is to them. I do not see a situation where they trade Mikael Backlund, who with his wife does tons of charity work in the city, for Ryan "drove into a timmies drunk at 4am" O'Rielly.

Same thing with Hamonic, he isn't going anywhere regardless of the price tag. They have been working on building a team around character since Treliving arrived.

Frolik? The guy is as automatic as they come. He always brings his game.
Very good points. This team is absolutely second to none when it comes to Character, Willingness to give back, care for the guy sitting beside you, and desire to win in YYC. It really is a solid group.
IgiTang is offline  
Old 12-10-2017, 05:37 PM   #4678
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Backlund could want $6.5M x 8 years which I could easily seemthr Flames walking away from.
If Backlund wants an 8-year deal, the Flames are the only team he can get it from, and he has no leverage. Whatever contract he signs, I'm certain the term will be shorter.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline  
Old 12-10-2017, 05:48 PM   #4679
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
If Backlund wants an 8-year deal, the Flames are the only team he can get it from, and he has no leverage. Whatever contract he signs, I'm certain the term will be shorter.
I don’t think Backlund would do what Turris did but it was interesting to hear Turris would only negotiate a 7-8 year deal with the Sens but was willing to take a 6 year deal from the Preds.

Turris is coming off a 5 year deal where he was underpaid the whole time. Backlund is coming off a 3 year deal of similar money. This is definitely Backs best chance to cash in.

Personally I hope the Flames sign him to max of 5 years and under $6M per. If he wants more would the Flames look at RoR since he is 2 years younger and signed for 5 years beyond this season even though he is paid $7.5M?

I don’t see the Flames looking at a player like RoR is Backlund is still in the long term plans. Perhaps this Sabres speculation is over Kane, Gorges, Lehner, or Reinhardt?

The Turris news (that the Flames were in on him during the Duchene talks) leads me to believe RoR could be the player they want from Buffalo
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 12-10-2017, 08:44 PM   #4680
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I could live with $6.0 x 6 yrs like the Turris deal. It's no bargain but the Flames could make it work.
__________________

Fire is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:07 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy