Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-06-2017, 08:50 PM   #101
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by home_sweet_dome View Post
Moral victory as they played good and coulda shoulda woulda won... But moral victories don't mean much at this point.
Huh?

It's game 27. We can hope this is the start of the turnaround, particularly in their defensive execution going forward.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to bubbsy For This Useful Post:
Old 12-06-2017, 08:50 PM   #102
Meers
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Exp:
Default

God, I hate deciding these things through a skills competition. Why not settle it with a fight? Or maybe a goal-line to goal-line race ... by the goaltenders? Sigh.

A well-played game and a well-deserved point.
Meers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Meers For This Useful Post:
Old 12-06-2017, 08:50 PM   #103
Jeff Lebowski
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Exp:
Default

I don't think CGY dominated that game. Yes they had a lot of shots but I didn't see many high percentage ones. In terms of great chances I thought it was pretty even, maybe a slight edge to CGY.

Not a lot of offensive flow. I'd like to see the d jump up more and get more entries be more creative
Jeff Lebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:51 PM   #104
Flames Fan, Ph.D.
#1 Goaltender
 
Flames Fan, Ph.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Underground
Exp:
Default

I guess they built the Leafs penalty box so small because there's no intent to call penalties on them. The 2 attendants in there were surprised a Leafs player actually came to squeeze in between them.

The Lazar thing has got to end. There's no way there isn't a more deserving player in Stockton. He's just... just... pointless out there.

And kudos to the drunk Flames fan who was actually working on a water. Hope you got that bottle unscrewed big guy!
Flames Fan, Ph.D. is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flames Fan, Ph.D. For This Useful Post:
Old 12-06-2017, 08:51 PM   #105
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

In the last eight games, the flames are 0-2-2 against playoff teams and 2-2 against non-playoff teams. Seems pretty predictable that the flames would lose given they were playing a playoff calibre team!

Good teams find ways to win. The flames did not find a way to win!
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:52 PM   #106
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
I don't think CGY dominated that game. Yes they had a lot of shots but I didn't see many high percentage ones. In terms of great chances I thought it was pretty even, maybe a slight edge to CGY.

Not a lot of offensive flow. I'd like to see the d jump up more and get more entries be more creative
lol you can't be serious, go look at some 3rd party stats

possession and scoring chances highly favor the Flames
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:52 PM   #107
nieuwy-89
First Line Centre
 
nieuwy-89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Iggy-ville
Exp:
Default

So I agree the Flames played well and Anderson stole the game. However, he didn’t make a single save in the shootout. More than one quarter of shooters should get a shot on net in a breakaway contest. Maybe we still lose, but Jesus, make the goalie earn it.
nieuwy-89 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nieuwy-89 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-06-2017, 08:52 PM   #108
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

one part of the game that was poorly executed was whatever the refs were doing out there.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:52 PM   #109
Corral
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Stampede Grounds
Exp:
Default

I wish the NHL would hurry up and eliminate the SO, and just let 3 on 3 end the game. The whole game was entertaining for a low scoring affair, but the OT was awesome. The SO was a let down (and I would still say that even if JG had scored)
Corral is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Corral For This Useful Post:
Old 12-06-2017, 08:52 PM   #110
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
lol they had almost 50 shots
If Andersen wasn't doing his best impression of Martin "Enterprise Rent-a-car" Brodeur, we could have ran away with the score.

__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:53 PM   #111
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

If the Flames play every game like that they are a 100+ point team and make the playoffs easily. That was complete domination with the exception of the last 5 minutes of the first. Lost to a great goaltending display.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:53 PM   #112
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Flames could really benefit from having another scoring threat up front. A healthy Jagr and Versteeg would probably provide enough compensation, but that's not the case currently.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:53 PM   #113
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
In the last eight games, the flames are 0-2-2 against playoff teams and 2-2 against non-playoff teams. Seems pretty predictable that the flames would lose given they were playing a playoff calibre team!

Good teams find ways to win. The flames did not find a way to win!
they won a ####ing shootout...has nothing to do with the team

you probably complain when Smith steals one
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:53 PM   #114
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Another way to look at this game is that the Leafs didn't show up on their first game after a road trip. And the flames still couldn't win.
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:53 PM   #115
Racki
First Line Centre
 
Racki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Meh. Disappointed but certainly not mad. Did everything but score. With goals so hard to come by I would love to see Mangiapane get a look if Jagr can't go. He's always looked great with Jankowski.
__________________
Racki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:54 PM   #116
bigrangy
Franchise Player
 
bigrangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
lol you can't be serious, go look at some 3rd party stats

possession and scoring chances highly favor the Flames
They really don't haha

60% shots for, 50% corsi for, 40% scoring chances for

Flames did not get to the dirty areas, though unlike usually, it wasn't for lack of trying. The leafs defended really well
__________________
Oliver Kylington is the greatest and best player in the world
bigrangy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bigrangy For This Useful Post:
Old 12-06-2017, 08:54 PM   #117
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Flames could have easily won 5-0. I doubt Andersen plays a better game this year.
zamler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:54 PM   #118
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
I don't think CGY dominated that game. Yes they had a lot of shots but I didn't see many high percentage ones. In terms of great chances I thought it was pretty even, maybe a slight edge to CGY.

Not a lot of offensive flow. I'd like to see the d jump up more and get more entries be more creative
Wasn't it like 10-1 shots at one point in the 3rd period?

I came into this game expecting a 6-2 loss with the d getting embarrassed again. Instead it was the best team d game of the year, where they still managed to greatly outshoot the leafs.

As a harsh criticiser of the flames play all year, even I can't help but be enthused with the team's play tonight.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bubbsy For This Useful Post:
Old 12-06-2017, 08:54 PM   #119
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Silver lining (aside from the point) is that the Flames are a game back of 3rd in the Pacific.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2017, 08:54 PM   #120
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
Another way to look at this game is that the Leafs didn't show up on their first game after a road trip. And the flames still couldn't win.
you kinda seem determined to be pouty about this game.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Mr.Coffee For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:21 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy