10-13-2017, 08:12 PM
|
#61
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maple Bay, B.C.
|
So long Ti-Cats, all that help and you still lose. Oh and you miss the playoffs, what a shame.
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 08:12 PM
|
#62
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Freaking KARMA bites your butt!!!
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 08:12 PM
|
#63
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Good. Screw you command Center, screw you refs, screw you league.
|
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 08:12 PM
|
#64
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kelowna
|
Holy ####!!
|
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 08:16 PM
|
#65
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: In the prairies, surrounded by sheep
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15
I’m not sure if the refs or rod black are worse.
|
We'll call it a draw...
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to #22 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 08:21 PM
|
#66
|
|
Voted for Kodos
|
And that Hamilton, is why you aren’t good this year. The Stamps sucked in all areas of the game, you got all the calls, and you still can’t win.
|
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 08:21 PM
|
#67
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I love how that game ended. Command Centre twice botched the calls. They didn't get a chance a hat trick of botched calls. I can't believe they called that a PI when the only thing a Stamps DB accidentally was the helmet. That Stamps PI in their favor is a legit and there's no way any of those referees can miss that call. Hamilton doesn't deserve a win tonight and I don't think they deserve to make the playoff this season. None of the Eastern teams deserves to be in a playoff as far as I am concern.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to OzSome For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 08:24 PM
|
#68
|
|
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
|
Even Duane Forde was tired of Blacks crap. He was insufferable tonight. The guy actively cheers against Calgary.
|
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 08:31 PM
|
#69
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank MetaMusil
Even Duane Forde was tired of Blacks crap. He was insufferable tonight. The guy actively cheers against Calgary.
|
He didn't even try to be objective, when the Stamps scored he was talking in monotone. Brutal.
|
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 08:52 PM
|
#70
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Rod Black is a joke, he is like Jim Hughson doing canuck games. not professional at all
|
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 08:54 PM
|
#71
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Stampede Grounds
|
Fully expected CFL control to call that PI against the Stamps on the challenge to allow for a tie game ... and from what I could tell so did the Stamps bench. Personally don't think there is anything wrong with giving the home crowd something to get excited about in the context of this game - nothing riding on it for Calgary, lots on the line for Hamilton.Granted it was the wrong call but at least possible to see it called PI - just about every close PI call can go either way.
|
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 08:55 PM
|
#72
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
He didn't even try to be objective, when the Stamps scored he was talking in monotone. Brutal.
|
Haha, when the Stamps got that defensive TD early on I wasn't even sure it was a TD. He sounded like someone just ran over his dog, I thought the play was blown dead or something.
|
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 09:03 PM
|
#73
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corral
Fully expected CFL control to call that PI against the Stamps on the challenge to allow for a tie game ... and from what I could tell so did the Stamps bench. Personally don't think there is anything wrong with giving the home crowd something to get excited about in the context of this game - nothing riding on it for Calgary, lots on the line for Hamilton.Granted it was the wrong call but at least possible to see it called PI - just about every close PI call can go either way.
|
Forde summed it up perfectly. if you need to slow it down that much to see if a guy gets there early, then he didnt. the mental wizards at command center cant understand that. i think CFL command is just monkeys spinning a wheel.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dirk diggler For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 09:21 PM
|
#74
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maple Bay, B.C.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corral
Fully expected CFL control to call that PI against the Stamps on the challenge to allow for a tie game ... and from what I could tell so did the Stamps bench. Personally don't think there is anything wrong with giving the home crowd something to get excited about in the context of this game - nothing riding on it for Calgary, lots on the line for Hamilton.Granted it was the wrong call but at least possible to see it called PI - just about every close PI call can go either way.
|
You do know that Calgary hasn't wrapped up first place in the West, right? I'd say hosting the West final constitutes quite a bit riding on the outcome of tonight's game.
|
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 09:30 PM
|
#75
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
|
Idea for change to challenge rule: If something takes 10 seconds to look at and see the the refs made an obvious error, that shouldn't count the same as the sort of super-slow-mo, back and forth, every angle review. So, let's say coaches get two 20-second reviews, and 1 full review. The 20-second reviews are for those 'refs missed something obvious' review, and the full review is for a really hard-to-call play. If you call a 20-second review and command center can't find conclusive reason to overturn it within 20 seconds of looking at film, you lose the challenge. Having a couple additional 20 second reviews a game would not slow it down at all, and it would solve these egregious calls that coaches need to occasionally burn their only challenge on.
|
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 09:47 PM
|
#76
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
|
It's just poetic justice that the Stamps won the game on a defensive PI against the Pussycat! 
|
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 10:13 PM
|
#77
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by octothorp
Idea for change to challenge rule: If something takes 10 seconds to look at and see the the refs made an obvious error, that shouldn't count the same as the sort of super-slow-mo, back and forth, every angle review. So, let's say coaches get two 20-second reviews, and 1 full review. The 20-second reviews are for those 'refs missed something obvious' review, and the full review is for a really hard-to-call play. If you call a 20-second review and command center can't find conclusive reason to overturn it within 20 seconds of looking at film, you lose the challenge. Having a couple additional 20 second reviews a game would not slow it down at all, and it would solve these egregious calls that coaches need to occasionally burn their only challenge on.
|
thats a pretty solid idea but until you improve the reffing, it might not solve much, there are that many weak calls made and trusting the bozos in the command center is not possible. they have the benefit of replay and still screw it up
|
|
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 10:22 PM
|
#78
|
|
Norm!
|
They have to start putting a time limit on reviews. When a review goes as long as that challenge did the officials are looking for a reason to call a penalty in frame by frame slow motion.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-13-2017, 10:23 PM
|
#79
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by octothorp
Idea for change to challenge rule: If something takes 10 seconds to look at and see the the refs made an obvious error, that shouldn't count the same as the sort of super-slow-mo, back and forth, every angle review. So, let's say coaches get two 20-second reviews, and 1 full review. The 20-second reviews are for those 'refs missed something obvious' review, and the full review is for a really hard-to-call play. If you call a 20-second review and command center can't find conclusive reason to overturn it within 20 seconds of looking at film, you lose the challenge. Having a couple additional 20 second reviews a game would not slow it down at all, and it would solve these egregious calls that coaches need to occasionally burn their only challenge on.
|
I think if it requires super-slo mo then it was close enough to to use the call on the field. Replay should only ever be to correct the obvious mistakes.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bobblehead For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-14-2017, 12:37 AM
|
#80
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Stampede Grounds
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_pinched
You do know that Calgary hasn't wrapped up first place in the West, right? I'd say hosting the West final constitutes quite a bit riding on the outcome of tonight's game.
|
Numbers aside - Calgary is hosting the West final. There has been no doubt about that for weeks now. Personally, I wish the Stamps had more to play for with what's left of the regular season.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:00 PM.
|
|
