| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:21 PM | #2941 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by simmer2  Well hopefully that's not the case re Nenshi.
 But if it is, hopefully Nenshi will do some actual math and realize there is a very real economic benefit and a very real economic impact if the team left, ie)
 
 - business tax on the property (which still blows me away we have this but this is real)
 - provincial corporate taxes
 - employees working there that spend money which drives the economy
 - people living in the city who spend money in and around the arena that drives the economy
 
 Hopefully facts and numbers can determine an agreeable return for both the City and the Flamea.
 |  
There is a better chance Nenshi is re-elected and turns the Saddledome into a library.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:25 PM | #2942 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by CorbeauNoir  What do you do all summer? |  
I play summer hockey and softball. I go camping. I watch CFL and MLB on TV and the pubs. 
 
You spend your summer in Libraries and looking at the Bow Towers?
 
I must really be missing something here! But that's ok, seems to go along with the typical argument here!
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:26 PM | #2943 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: California      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by northcrunk  There is a better chance Nenshi is re-elected and turns the Saddledome into a library. |  
It's already quiet enough
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:26 PM | #2944 |  
	| It's not easy being green! 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: In the tubes to Vancouver Island      | 
				  
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by New Era  I don't think they do.  You may think Ken King is full of ####, and that's fine, but he has repeatedly stated that this chapter is over and its time to move on.  The owners of the team are pretty committed when they make a decision, and the decision appears to have been made.  I just hope the fans will accept the path the ownership has charted moving forward, and all possible outcomes.
 I think that means that for the foreseeable future the Flames plan to operate out of the Saddledome and will do so with a self-imposed budget.  This means that the days of paying to the cap are probably done and it will result in operational changes for the team in the future.  If that means that they can no longer afford players, so be it, those players will be cast aside (its been nice knowing you Mr. Backlund) and there will be no possibility of increasing the funds available, even short term.  If the team can't compete, that is an outcome (expected) they will deal with downstream.
 
 If, as a result of operational challenges, the team is no longer generating revenues or appears to be profitable as a result of the economic conditions affecting the club, the owners will call it a day and look for someone else to assume the ownership of the hockey team.  I'm sure they will look locally, but based on the economics of building, finding a local owner may not be easy.  It may be much easier to find an owner elsewhere who has desires of moving the team to where they can be a second tenant for their building.  I think this is a much more likely outcome than finding local ownership, unless the citizens of Calgary want to go Green Bay Packer and publicly own the team.
 
 I just don't see the owners coming back to the negotiation table as it appears they believe there is nothing left to negotiate.  The idea is dead, and its time to move on.  Now its just a matter of nature taking its course.
 |  
So, I guess that means that we can close the thread, there will never be an arena for the Flames. Not this incarnation anyway. Decision made. Team will play out it’s days and leave or fold. 
 
Are you such an apologist that you honestly believe that they’re actually done?
		 
				__________________Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to kermitology For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:26 PM | #2945 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Calgary, AB      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Manhattanboy  I should have clarified. My point was a guy like Hotchkiss would have foreseen the negative reaction to trotting out Bettman and would have pursued a different PR strategy. |  
Pure speculation.  Plus he only had a 22% stake in the club.  Even if he disagreed it might not make a difference.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:27 PM | #2946 |  
	| Retired | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by New Era  Really?  What's he said lately?  Are you talking about the Chamber  of Commerce, where he refused to be dragged into a discussion about the  arena?  Seems they are trying to move forward, but people keep asking  questions about the arena issue, which he is refusing to answer. |  
You can't be serious.  Are we talking about the same chamber meeting where he basically talked about how important the Flames were to the city and the economic benefits of having them here?  That chamber meeting would have probably never happened if it wasn't for this entire arena debacle.  
 
The point of the meeting was to lay out the case for why the Flames are important to the city and by proxy need a new arena.  
 
I mean kudos to you for thinking how stunning and brave Ken King is for refusing to be dragged into a discussion about the arena.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:30 PM | #2947 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Flash Walken  ^idiotic take is idiotic, detached from the reality around us |  
Are you copying and pasting this response everywhere?
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:32 PM | #2948 |  
	| #1 Goaltender 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: the middle      | 
 
			
			New Era seems like the guy who has paid the sticker price on every car he's bought because "that's what they said it costs."
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:32 PM | #2949 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			I would think if the city offered up a deal closer to the flames vision, they would go back into the room
		 
				__________________If I do not come back avenge my death
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:35 PM | #2950 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Calgary, AB      | 
 
			
			The Flames will have to wait for Nenshi to be out of office, before any significant movement in a arena deal will happen.  It's clear Nenshi doesn't care if the Flames remain in the city or not.  I know he only has one vote, blah blah blah, but when the city leader cares so little it hurts the process.  I doubt Nenshi will remain Mayor longer than 2 more terms.  So it might not be until 2023 until we will start seeing movement on the arena front.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:37 PM | #2951 |  
	| #1 Goaltender 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: the middle      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Northendzone  I would think if the city offered up a deal closer to the flames vision, they would go back into the room |  
Haven't you been listening? They're done. It's over. They're not pursuing one anymore. It's finito. All we have to do is wait for the consequences now.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:41 PM | #2952 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by New Era  That's what you're hoping.   You are hoping this is just a standard negotiation ploy.  What if it  isn't?  Are you prepared for the consequences? |  
They aren't and I am. end of story.
 
	Quote: 
	
		| The report in question was not a Saddledome Foundation Report.  It was compiled by the City of Calgary and was part of their risk analysis for the the Saddledome renovation. |  
The only thing i can find is the Flames Foundation Report https://calgary.bibliocommons.com/item/show/217634095 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:41 PM | #2953 |  
	| Threadkiller 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: 51.0544° N, 114.0669° W      | 
 
			
			The CSEC's plan to raise this issue at this particular time, in this way has backfired horribly.  They are simply tucking their tails between their legs and waiting for the election and its results to subside.  I'm willing to bet that after the election, the parties start talking again.  No one wants the outcome of leaving... Neither side.  And each individual side knows that.
 It's a bad game of poker.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:42 PM | #2954 |  
	| Fearmongerer 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.      | 
 
			
			Meanwhile the City of Dallas/Arlington broke ground today on their 2nd Billion dollar plus arena in a decade.https://www.dallasnews.com/business/...ington-stadium |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:43 PM | #2955 |  
	| Scoring Winger | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Fire  The Flames will have to wait for Nenshi to be out of office, before any significant movement in a arena deal will happen.  It's clear Nenshi doesn't care if the Flames remain in the city or not.  I know he only has one vote, blah blah blah, but when the city leader cares so little it hurts the process.  I doubt Nenshi will remain Mayor longer than 2 more terms.  So it might not be until 2023 until we will start seeing movement on the arena front. |  
I take it you only read Bettman's "take" of how their meeting went, where he claimed Nenshi doesn't care if the Flames remain"? Nenshi already came out and said that's not at all how the discussion went.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:43 PM | #2956 |  
	| It's not easy being green! 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: In the tubes to Vancouver Island      | 
 
			
			*double post*
		 
				__________________Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
 
				 Last edited by kermitology; 09-29-2017 at 01:07 PM.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:44 PM | #2957 |  
	| Crash and Bang Winger | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Jason14h  You spend your summer in Libraries and looking at the Bow Towers? |  
I work for an architecture office. Why wouldn't I be legitimately interested in Calgary's architectural legacy?
 
My point is that declaring an institution that's largely shuttered up for 4-5 months of the year as if it's critical lynchpin of what makes a city work is asinine. Calgary isn't a seasonal resort town. By your own admission you've already figured out plenty of things to do when you don't have the steady IV drip of the Flames' regular season you apparently require to get through your day-to-day life. Why would that suddenly change under the unlikely scenario of the Flames moving?
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to CorbeauNoir For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:44 PM | #2958 |  
	| Threadkiller 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: 51.0544° N, 114.0669° W      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Cappy   |  
Damn, that's at the library!
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ricosuave For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:56 PM | #2959 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Fire  Pure speculation. Plus he only had a 22% stake in the club. Even if he disagreed it might not make a difference. |  
But if I recall correctly he was the managing partner at the time, so would have led the discussions.
   
 I have heard different reports as to the current ownership breakdown. From equal 20% shares to Murray Edwards holding the largest individual partnership interest. I do not think he owns over 50% however.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  09-29-2017, 12:58 PM | #2960 |  
	| #1 Goaltender 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: the middle      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Manhattanboy  But if I recall correctly he was the managing partner at the time, so would have led the discussions.
 I have heard different reports as to the current ownership breakdown. From equal 20% shares to Murray Edwards holding the largest individual partnership interest. I do not think he owns over 50% however.
 |  
Can swear I remember hearing that Edwards bought all of Hotchkiss' share, but that might have been speculation on part of a writer way back when.
		 |  
	|   |  |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Roughneck For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:49 AM. | 
 
 
 |