View Poll Results: Donald Trump's first 100 days have been a success.
|
Agree
|
  
|
45 |
11.00% |
Not sure
|
  
|
22 |
5.38% |
Disagree
|
  
|
342 |
83.62% |
08-03-2017, 10:59 PM
|
#7421
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Vancouver Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary
If Hillary is an issue like you say she is, then Trump should get an investigation going on her...
I mean, he only controls the 3 houses of government and has a hand picked monkey as the AG, a conservative majority in the supreme court and clearly does not like Hillary.
I'll save any outrage until there is an actual investigation launched by the Trump administration and it uncovers, you know, facts...
not the 'alternative facts' that seem to satisfy Trump supporters... you guys should have all the facts you need on Hillary's pedophilia ring and the murders orchestrated by the Clintons by now... its been what? 25 years?
Talk about being thick
.
|
The hypocrisy in this thread is the issue. Trump colluding with Russia, where's the evidence?
Trump can't get his head and his @$$ wired together, he's stuck playing defense and besides, said he wouldn't call for an investigation citing she had been through enough.
If it's the principle of collusion that you all are in a huff about, why not be outraged about the possibility that both parties might be tied to Russia ( which they clearly are)?
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:00 PM
|
#7422
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminaughty
LOL you call it a straw man, then admit it's a factor. She lost because she was a horrible candidate that nobody trusted. She was blacking out on the campaign trail and questions of her fitness to handle the rigors of the job seemed adequate.
|
Omg, am I reading Faux News?
__________________
Pass the bacon.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:01 PM
|
#7423
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminaughty
LOL you call it a straw man, then admit it's a factor. She lost because she was a horrible candidate that nobody trusted. She was blacking out on the campaign trail and questions of her fitness to handle the rigors of the job seemed adequate.
One of the points that this separate investigation that is being called upon is about the contents of those emails. Comey didn't have the authority to make a ruling on whether her actions were criminal or not. Comey said Trump was never being investigated, did you miss that part? Trump should have fired him once he took office, but Trump gonna keep Trumping.
Deleting her emails after she had been subpoenaed is indicative of criminality.
Seth Rich murder, the one who was likely responsible for those DNC leaks.
|
So, start an investigation on Hillary then
Trump's the POTUS.
the GOP control the Senate.
the GOP control the Congress
the GOP have a majority in the Supreme court
the GOP have a lap dog in Sessions as the AG
I mean if the facts of Hillary's guilt is so obvious, then it should be slam dunk for Trump right? I mean he need a win pretty desperately... Sounds like Hillary is low lying fruit...
Seth Rich? you mean the story retracted by Hannity after the story got pulled by senior Fox news executives? The one that Fox is currently getting sued for?
lol
Last edited by oldschoolcalgary; 08-03-2017 at 11:05 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to oldschoolcalgary For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:02 PM
|
#7424
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminaughty
Why? I thought you lefties were all about diversity and inclusion... Clearly not when it comes to a difference of opinion.
Am I interrupting your game of soft lob tennis?
|
Not really, you're just proving how gullible and unstable you are, and...
Read the thread title...
Orange is the new POTUS.
Start a crooked Hillary who didn't win, thread.
__________________
Pass the bacon.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:04 PM
|
#7425
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Vancouver Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
Why would you expect to know about the evidence? Are you unclear on how investigations work?
There's sufficient evidence for there to be a grand jury now. Subpoenas have already gone out, meaning the jury thought there was sufficient cause to warrant sending out subpoenas.
EDIT: At the very least Trump Jr. admitted to campaign finance law violations, but I doubt they'd convene a grand jury for that.
|
So you admit all this outrage over the last calendar year has been a bit premature then? I've been watching this thread and it's been Russia Russia for quite sometime.
It seems hypocritical to make fun of those "conspiracy theorists" for having no evidence, then saying that's not how investigations work when asked for evidence of a conspiracy you are taking part in.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:04 PM
|
#7426
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminaughty
The hypocrisy in this thread is the issue. Trump colluding with Russia, where's the evidence?
Trump can't get his head and his @$$ wired together, he's stuck playing defense and besides, said he wouldn't call for an investigation citing she had been through enough.
If it's the principle of collusion that you all are in a huff about, why not be outraged about the possibility that both parties might be tied to Russia ( which they clearly are)?
|
Hypocrisy in this thread?
Repeat after me: THERE'S NO INVESTIGATION on Hillary...
As for Trump, that's what the grand jury is for...
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:04 PM
|
#7427
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Lol
It's a straw man because no one says it's THE reason she lost, grammar is hard.
Clinton ordered the emails deleted months before they were requested.
Comey said Trump wasn't personally under investigation because at the time he wasn't. He is now.
And yeah, Seth Rich, keep hoping, even a stopped clock is right sometimes.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:06 PM
|
#7428
|
First Line Centre
|
Why are people engaging? Delusion is not something you can logically counter. Waste of time and clutters up a perfectly good thread.
|
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Titan For This Useful Post:
|
Coach,
darockwilder,
direwolf,
FlameOn,
FLAMESRULE,
jammies,
jayswin,
Ryan Coke,
Sliver,
The Fonz,
wireframe,
wittynickname
|
08-03-2017, 11:06 PM
|
#7429
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Vancouver Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary
I welcome debating any rational Trump supporters...
Invite as many many as you want...
|
I'm not a Trump supporter but I'd gladly one on one you any day in Geo politics. I'm a little outnumbered in this hug box but we could take it to qallout?
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:09 PM
|
#7430
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Vancouver Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
Trotting out all the tortured falsehoods?
She didn't broker a deal, she wasn't involved in the deal at all, it was a private deal between corporations. She was one of 9 departments that had to give feedback on the deal, but she could neither approve nor disapprove, she had no power.
Keep up the misinformation campaign though.
Because they were personal emails, the government has no need or right to have them. Jeb Bush deleted his personal emails. GWB "lost" millions of emails. Rubio deleted emails. Romney deleted all his emails from when he was governor.
You're wondering where the outrage is, where's your outrage over all the others who've deleted emails?
|
How do you know what was on those emails?
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:10 PM
|
#7431
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminaughty
I'm not a Trump supporter but I'd gladly one on one you any day in Geo politics. I'm a little outnumbered in this hug box but we could take it to qallout?
|
feel free to pm if you want...
though trying to reason with someone that uses the Seth Rich "story" as evidence doesn't fill me with much confidence wrt the rational threshold
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:11 PM
|
#7432
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
|
How about those phone calls Trump got from the Boy Scouts and the Mexican president?
__________________
Pass the bacon.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:12 PM
|
#7433
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Vancouver Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KelVarnsen
So Illuminaughty is Sean Hannity?
|
LOL Could you imagine. Now that would be funny.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:13 PM
|
#7434
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminaughty
LOL Could you imagine. Now that would be funny.
|
You're like his puppet.
__________________
Pass the bacon.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:13 PM
|
#7435
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maple Bay, B.C.
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to dash_pinched For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:17 PM
|
#7436
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Vancouver Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titan
Why are people engaging? Delusion is not something you can logically counter. Waste of time and clutters up a perfectly good thread.
|
Oh come on, at least I'm adding a little fun and life to this echo chamber. It's all theatre and most of you guys take this stuff way to seriously.
It was down to either Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump as POTUS. That speaks volumes to how bad the state of governance is in the free world.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:18 PM
|
#7437
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminaughty
So you admit all this outrage over the last calendar year has been a bit premature then? I've been watching this thread and it's been Russia Russia for quite sometime.
It seems hypocritical to make fun of those "conspiracy theorists" for having no evidence, then saying that's not how investigations work when asked for evidence of a conspiracy you are taking part in.
|
Not having the evidence laid out in front of us doesn't mean there hasn't been smoke; there's been plenty of it, enough to warrant further investigation, and that's just the stuff we know about and that they've publicly admitted to.
The difference is I haven't made a conclusion about Trump yet, and I am willing to accept alternatives for the smoke.
Seth Rich promoters have their conclusion and work to find evidence for it.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:20 PM
|
#7438
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Vancouver Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary
feel free to pm if you want...
though trying to reason with someone that uses the Seth Rich "story" as evidence doesn't fill me with much confidence wrt the rational threshold
|
I didn't even bring up Seth Rich, Photon did and I played along. I'm not a Trump supporter, I just thought he was the pragmatic better choice over Hillary......
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:21 PM
|
#7439
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminaughty
I didn't even bring up Seth Rich, Photon did and I played along. I'm not a Trump supporter, I just thought he was the pragmatic better choice over Hillary......
|
Hilarious,
__________________
Pass the bacon.
|
|
|
08-03-2017, 11:21 PM
|
#7440
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Vancouver Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuffMan
How about those phone calls Trump got from the Boy Scouts and the Mexican president?
|
Which ones? The ones that didn't happen?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 AM.
|
|