Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2017, 09:45 AM   #541
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Trading first round picks for a player that not only fills the organization's biggest current roster gap, and also fits the age range where he can be here for the next half decade+ is not going "full Sutter".

Our prospect pool is not bad as-is, and it's time this team starts to compete. Just like how LA made their big moves to push them over the top, our time is near.

That said - I would be surprised to see Tree deal two 1st round picks, but if he does it won't take me much to get on board, the hope would have to be that something additional is coming back (a 2nd or something)

Last edited by ComixZone; 06-23-2017 at 09:47 AM.
ComixZone is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2017, 09:46 AM   #542
DomeFoam
Scoring Winger
 
DomeFoam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Kelowna
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Nawww, Smith hasn't been overly good for a couple of seasons now. Elliott was the better goaltender over that period and we know how that turned out. The age of Smith is showing. Personally, having to watch the Coyotes a fair bit, I was pretty choked when the Flames made the deal. I don't believe his talent can cash the checks his reputation is writing. I expect Calgary to be looking for another goaltender come Christmas, or hoping one of the kids can take the reigns by that point. Treliving likely got blinded by his history with the a player rather than looking at what he currently is. This happens all the time, even around here, and it usually ends up in disappointment.
I'd like to think Smith is overtly used to being bogged down in his own zone playing a Tippett trap that forces a ton of shots from the perimeter and thus relies heavily on quick instincts and rebound control, something Elliot sorely lacked and expected his D to do it all for him.

Maybe Smith becomes complacent knowing he has competent defense in front of him or maybe his job becomes that much easier and he shines. I prefer the latter POV - he makes the Flames much better.

Last edited by DomeFoam; 06-23-2017 at 09:49 AM.
DomeFoam is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 09:48 AM   #543
RyZ
First Line Centre
 
RyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrykerSteve View Post
I could see something like this happening...

To NYI:
CGY 2017 1st round pick
CGY 2018 1st round pick

To CGY:
2017 2nd round pick
Travis Hamonic
This would be one of those "Id drive Treliving to the airport myself" type of trades. Yuck
RyZ is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to RyZ For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2017, 09:51 AM   #544
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Elliotte Friedman‏ @FriedgeHNIC
A lot of rumblings today that CHI and ARIZ are working on a deal that would allow the Blackhawks to move up to number 7 in the draft

Might be a tough week for Coyotes fan
Ashasx is online now  
Old 06-23-2017, 09:54 AM   #545
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I simply can't see the price being equal to what we paid for Hamilton which I believe your proposal is.

The talk on the FAN was the Islanders did not want to take back salary so looking for picks and prospects. I do think the 16th pick is in play but I doubt anything beyond that.

The Flames core is young so they could maybe get away with dealing their first but not multiple firsts.
Which is why moving Fox would be such a bad idea. The Flames gave up a 1st to get Hamilton, which created a hole in the prospect depth. They got lucky with Kylington falling to the 2nd, almost making up for that. The Flames then managed to find a player in Fox that would now be a consensus first rounder in a re-draft, pretty much plugging that hole in top end prospects. To lose two first round picks then puts a ton of pressure to find other gems to step up. I think you need at least two solid prospects with serious NHL potential at every position.

C - Jankowski, Dube, Lindstrom (?)
LW - Shinkaruk, Klimchuk, Mangiapane (?)
RW - Poirier, Tuulola (?), Smith (?)
LD - Kylington, Ollas-Mattsson
RD - Andersson, Fox
G - Gillies, Parsons, MacDonald

The Flames system has some gaps to close and need those high picks.
Lanny_McDonald is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 09:55 AM   #546
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Elliotte Friedman‏ @FriedgeHNIC
A lot of rumblings today that CHI and ARIZ are working on a deal that would allow the Blackhawks to move up to number 7 in the draft

Might be a tough week for Coyotes fan
some rumblings that the Coyotes may be taking on Hossa's contract too
sureLoss is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 09:56 AM   #547
StrykerSteve
Ass Handler
 
StrykerSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
Trading first round picks for a player that not only fills the organization's biggest current roster gap, and also fits the age range where he can be here for the next half decade+ is not going "full Sutter".

Our prospect pool is not bad as-is, and it's time this team starts to compete. Just like how LA made their big moves to push them over the top, our time is near.

That said - I would be surprised to see Tree deal two 1st round picks, but if he does it won't take me much to get on board, the hope would have to be that something additional is coming back (a 2nd or something)
Yeah, that's essentially my line of thinking as well. A prospect pipeline is great to have, but Hamonic would essentially be a fully developed prospect ready to step into a top 4 role on a great value deal with 3 years remaining on said deal.

That's why his value is expected to be higher than normal, it's a pretty unique scenario, most teams wouldn't be entertaining trading a player like that. He wants to play near home, I think Treliving wants to capitalize on that..
StrykerSteve is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 09:56 AM   #548
MissTeeks
Franchise Player
 
MissTeeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Elliotte Friedman‏ @FriedgeHNIC
A lot of rumblings today that CHI and ARIZ are working on a deal that would allow the Blackhawks to move up to number 7 in the draft

Might be a tough week for Coyotes fan


__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!

Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
MissTeeks is online now  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MissTeeks For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2017, 09:57 AM   #549
Murph
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Murph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bonavista, Newfoundland
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
some rumblings that the Coyotes may be taking on Hossa's contract too
If the Hawks are moving up and the Coyotes are taking on Hossa, there must be a significant piece going to the Coyotes.
Murph is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 09:59 AM   #550
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
some rumblings that the Coyotes may be taking on Hossa's contract too
It really upsets me that the Coyotes exist for the purposes of helping other franchises out of their binds.
Ashasx is online now  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2017, 10:02 AM   #551
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
Trading first round picks for a player that not only fills the organization's biggest current roster gap, and also fits the age range where he can be here for the next half decade+ is not going "full Sutter".

Our prospect pool is not bad as-is, and it's time this team starts to compete. Just like how LA made their big moves to push them over the top, our time is near.

That said - I would be surprised to see Tree deal two 1st round picks, but if he does it won't take me much to get on board, the hope would have to be that something additional is coming back (a 2nd or something)
I totally disagree. We should be thinking about now and the future every year. Just keep filling the pool. No 1st, 2nd or 3rd would be terrible for a team like this. We don't need 3 first rounders, but we should be trying to get a player or two per draft to stay competitive for a long time. Trading the 1st should be a non starter after already burning the 2nd and 3rd.
dustygoon is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 10:02 AM   #552
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Chicago also seems to weasel their way out of precarious scenarios somehow.
Muta is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 10:09 AM   #553
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
Trading first round picks for a player that not only fills the organization's biggest current roster gap, and also fits the age range where he can be here for the next half decade+ is not going "full Sutter".
Except you're not getting a player for half a decade. You're getting a player for the remainder of his contract. Hamonic and Brodie would come due at the same time. You are likely going to lose one or possibly both in free agency.
Lanny_McDonald is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 10:10 AM   #554
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Which is why moving Fox would be such a bad idea. The Flames gave up a 1st to get Hamilton, which created a hole in the prospect depth. They got lucky with Kylington falling to the 2nd, almost making up for that. The Flames then managed to find a player in Fox that would now be a consensus first rounder in a re-draft, pretty much plugging that hole in top end prospects. To lose two first round picks then puts a ton of pressure to find other gems to step up. I think you need at least two solid prospects with serious NHL potential at every position.

C - Jankowski, Dube, Lindstrom (?)
LW - Shinkaruk, Klimchuk, Mangiapane (?)
RW - Poirier, Tuulola (?), Smith (?)
LD - Kylington, Ollas-Mattsson
RD - Andersson, Fox
G - Gillies, Parsons, MacDonald

The Flames system has some gaps to close and need those high picks.
You seem stuck in rebuilding thinking. We're exiting the rebuild now and entering our contending phase. Now is the time you can use some (not all) of your picks/prospects to plug the last major holes on the team.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2017, 10:11 AM   #555
rhino
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Nawww, Smith hasn't been overly good for a couple of seasons now. Elliott was the better goaltender over that period and we know how that turned out. The age of Smith is showing. Personally, having to watch the Coyotes a fair bit, I was pretty choked when the Flames made the deal. I don't believe his talent can cash the checks his reputation is writing. I expect Calgary to be looking for another goaltender come Christmas, or hoping one of the kids can take the reigns by that point. Treliving likely got blinded by his history with the a player rather than looking at what he currently is. This happens all the time, even around here, and it usually ends up in disappointment.
Elliott was also playing behind one of the best defensive structured teams in the league.
rhino is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 10:11 AM   #556
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Except you're not getting a player for half a decade. You're getting a player for the remainder of his contract. Hamonic and Brodie would come due at the same time. You are likely going to lose one or possibly both in free agency.
Can't project that with salary cap growth etc., but even so - that's on Tree to figure out a way to make it work. Doesn't seem impossible to me.

And also, what are we trying to build? A Stanley Cup team, or a mid-range team that we can keep together for a long time but never win the cup. At some point, it's time to push. Look at our roster - all major spots are filled, we're entering our time to push.
ComixZone is offline  
Old 06-23-2017, 10:15 AM   #557
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
You seem stuck in rebuilding thinking. We're exiting the rebuild now and entering our contending phase. Now is the time you can use some (not all) of your picks/prospects to plug the last major holes on the team.
No, I'm stuck in sustaining mode. You need a constant flow of talent in the pipeline in a salary cap world. That is how you afford big ticket players while competing for the cup. Without those young guys stepping in an being able to contribute throughout the lineup, and not in spot fourth line roles, you do not have a hope of winning a cup let alone sustaining a contender.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
Can't project that with salary cap growth etc., but even so - that's on Tree to figure out a way to make it work. Doesn't seem impossible to me.

And also, what are we trying to build? A Stanley Cup team, or a mid-range team that we can keep together for a long time but never win the cup. At some point, it's time to push. Look at our roster - all major spots are filled, we're entering our time to push.
I think we're two years away from that. Until Bennett steps up and proves he's a scorer, and Tkachuk shows he has the consistency throughout the season, we aren't there. I also think the promotion of Jankowski and one of the defensive kids will make our window two years out. I think the incoming youth will be very important to the success over the next two seasons.

Last edited by Lanny_McDonald; 06-23-2017 at 10:18 AM.
Lanny_McDonald is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2017, 10:16 AM   #558
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
No, I'm stuck in sustaining mode. You need a constant flow of talent in the pipeline in a salary cap world. That is how you afford big ticket players while competing for the cup. Without those young guys stepping in an being able to contribute throughout the lineup, and not in spot fourth line roles, you do not have a hope of winning a cup let alone sustaining a contender.
Sustain what? You enter "sustaining mode" after you actually win something.
ComixZone is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2017, 10:16 AM   #559
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Which is why moving Fox would be such a bad idea. The Flames gave up a 1st to get Hamilton, which created a hole in the prospect depth. They got lucky with Kylington falling to the 2nd, almost making up for that. The Flames then managed to find a player in Fox that would now be a consensus first rounder in a re-draft, pretty much plugging that hole in top end prospects. To lose two first round picks then puts a ton of pressure to find other gems to step up. I think you need at least two solid prospects with serious NHL potential at every position.

C - Jankowski, Dube, Lindstrom (?)
LW - Shinkaruk, Klimchuk, Mangiapane (?)
RW - Poirier, Tuulola (?), Smith (?)
LD - Kylington, Ollas-Mattsson
RD - Andersson, Fox
G - Gillies, Parsons, MacDonald

The Flames system has some gaps to close and need those high picks.


I feel the Flames have drafted amazingly in the second round the last 2 years. Kylington, Andersen, Dube, Parsons are all top 10 prospects in the organization. The Flames have Gaudreau for 5 more years before he bolts or likely costs $8-$10M per.

I think they should start putting their chips towards the middle and going for it.
Vinny01 is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2017, 10:19 AM   #560
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

lol, the flames have basically just had the same luck the oilers have had, high first round picks turning out, and some people act like there has been a scouting and drafting transformation in Calgary.

THe flames just gave up a 2nd/3rd round pick for a goalie for the second year in a row.

They can't just keep going out and dealing away picks and prospects without it hurting the actual roster.
Flash Walken is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:43 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy