06-21-2017, 04:48 AM
|
#1
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Vegas claims Stoner from Ducks. Does not pick Manson/Vatanen and gets Theodore
Bob McKenzieVerified account @TSNBobMcKenzie
Replying to @TSNBobMcKenzie
Let's start with ANA. The belief is VGK will claim Clayton Stoner, pass on Manson/Vatanen and, in return for all that, get Shea Theodore.
Bob McKenzieVerified account @TSNBobMcKenzie
Replying to @TSNBobMcKenzie
I can't report that as a dead-set certain fact but there is a strong sense that is the ANA-VGK deal or something close to it.
Last edited by sureLoss; 06-21-2017 at 08:12 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-21-2017, 04:50 AM
|
#2
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Think there should just me a massive "GDT" or Vegas Thread to encompass all of the news that will be surrounding that franchise in the next few days because surely this is the first of many.
|
|
|
06-21-2017, 05:18 AM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
|
Manson>Theodore. I guess McPhee is playing nice. Trying to build relationships...
|
|
|
06-21-2017, 05:21 AM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
|
Not sure why McPhee is doing any favours for a divisional rival but I guess he thinks two players are better than one.
Also, thanks sureLoss for getting up early to share all the expansion rumours!
__________________
The masses of humanity have always had to surf.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FireGilbert For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-21-2017, 05:25 AM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FireGilbert
Not sure why McPhee is doing any favours for a divisional rival but I guess he thinks two players are better than one.
Also, thanks sureLoss for getting up early to share all the expansion rumours!
|
Or he felt that Anaheim had options of buying out Bieska, and trading Vatanan, such that his return is actually better than what he might have gotten.
I doubt he's doing any favours, and likely really likes his return.
|
|
|
06-21-2017, 05:26 AM
|
#6
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
Manson>Theodore. I guess McPhee is playing nice. Trying to build relationships...
|
Not really about playing nice.
If Vegas and Ducks don't agree to this deal before protection lists were submitted the following happens:
1. Ducks buyout Bieksa
2. Ducks trade Vatanen
3. Vegas gets their choice of Boll, Kerdiles, Shaw, Carrick, Wagner, Tropp, Etem, Stoner, Megna, Tokarski in the expansion draft
At least this way Vegas gets a decent prospect out of it too.
Last edited by sureLoss; 06-21-2017 at 05:30 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-21-2017, 05:42 AM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
|
I think trading Vatanen would have been easier said than done. Defense was harder to protect and I don't believe any expansion-eligible defensemen were traded during the window. Mostly I was just looking forward to the Ducks getting boned.
|
|
|
06-21-2017, 05:55 AM
|
#8
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Nah it would have been easy to trade D. There were more than enough teams that had extra protection slots. Teams like Toronto, Phoenix, Montreal etc. Heck even Buffalo and Jersey had slots and traded for Beaulieu and Mueller before the trade freeze and used them.
The difference is the teams like the Ducks and Wild felt they were better off paying the "expansion tax" to Vegas than getting the returns for their d-men via trade to another team.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-21-2017, 06:07 AM
|
#9
|
Ass Handler
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
|
Theodore still a good young defenceman, Vegas makes out well here.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to StrykerSteve For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-21-2017, 07:21 AM
|
#10
|
Franchise Player
|
Bit of a headscratcher for me. I like Theodore but Vatanen is still young and established... Would think he is worth way more in a trade.
|
|
|
06-21-2017, 07:28 AM
|
#11
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81
Bit of a headscratcher for me. I like Theodore but Vatanen is still young and established... Would think he is worth way more in a trade.
|
For Anaheim, they'd rather keep Vatanen on their roster than trade him. For Vegas, as SureLoss pointed out, that wasn't going to be an option, as Anaheim wouldn't have exposed him without a deal in place.
|
|
|
06-21-2017, 07:29 AM
|
#12
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81
Bit of a headscratcher for me. I like Theodore but Vatanen is still young and established... Would think he is worth way more in a trade.
|
Straight up Theodore is probably more attractive to VGK. Younger, cheaper, further from UFA.
Theodore is exactly the type of asset they want most. Young, skilled, on the cusp of making the NHL. He could be a key cog for them for a decade.
|
|
|
06-21-2017, 07:32 AM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
|
So then make them trade him and take Manson or Silfverberberg if they wouldn't pay fair value. Your team has a way better chance of making the playoffs with Anaheim dismantling a bit so I don't see why they let them off.
That said Theodore is a great prospect. Just disappointed the ducks got off a bit easy compared to some of the other rumored deals of 1st rounders and solid players to protect lesser guys than Vatanen/Manson
|
|
|
06-21-2017, 07:36 AM
|
#14
|
In the Sin Bin
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: compton
|
This would sting for the Ducks as much as the Flames losing the 16th overall pick would. Or worse. Theodore is probably a better d prospect than anything we have in the system.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to icecube For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-21-2017, 07:39 AM
|
#15
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81
So then make them trade him and take Manson or Silfverberberg if they wouldn't pay fair value. Your team has a way better chance of making the playoffs with Anaheim dismantling a bit so I don't see why they let them off.
That said Theodore is a great prospect. Just disappointed the ducks got off a bit easy compared to some of the other rumored deals of 1st rounders and solid players to protect lesser guys than Vatanen/Manson
|
I think Theodore is worth as much as Manson or Silfverberg and worth more than a mid-late 1st or Vatanen. Young defencemen are one of the most valuable assets in the league
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-21-2017, 08:03 AM
|
#16
|
Franchise Player
|
Well this is getting ridiculous. Stoner is a depth D but Theodore is already a top 4, potential top 2. I had no expectation that the cost for Vegas to pick the guy you want them to would be this high. If things keep going this way and they make a couple of good moves, it's not even crazy to think Vegas has a shot at a wild card berth.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-21-2017, 08:33 AM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81
So then make them trade him and take Manson or Silfverberberg if they wouldn't pay fair value. Your team has a way better chance of making the playoffs with Anaheim dismantling a bit so I don't see why they let them off.
That said Theodore is a great prospect. Just disappointed the ducks got off a bit easy compared to some of the other rumored deals of 1st rounders and solid players to protect lesser guys than Vatanen/Manson
|
How would they have gotten Manson or Silfverberg?
The rumoured deal has been in place for awhile. As pointed out numerous times, had the deal not been in place the Ducks likely buyout Bieksa and trade Vatanen to a team like the Leafs who had a protection spot and were rumoured to be in on him for a year.
Then the Ducks protect:
Andrew Cogliano
Ryan Getzlaf
Ryan Kesler
Corey Perry
Rickard Rakell
Jakob Silfverberg
Antoine Vermette
Josh Manson
Cam Fowler
Hampus Lindholm
John Gibson
Vegas gets the option of Boll, Stoner or an non-bought-out Despres. A laughable alternative to Theodore, if this is true.
Instead, Vegas and the Ducks, apparently, came to a deal where the Ducks didn't need to buyout Bieksa, didn't need to trade Vatanen and Vegas gets an infinitely better player than Jared Boll on an expiring contract.
If you're talking about playoffs in the future, having a player like Theodore actually maybe gives you a chance in the somewhat near future...replacing him with Boll and it's a laughable probability.
If anything, Vegas made out like bandits if this ends up being true.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Oling_Roachinen For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-21-2017, 08:54 AM
|
#18
|
Franchise Player
|
I think Vegas did well but I don't think it would have been as easy as just flip the script and move on that easily for the Ducks. Bieksa is on a 35+ contract so a buyout opens the protection spot but would be a brutal dead cap space of 4 mil this year. The ducks are almost at the cap. Vatanen could have been traded for a very poor return in a forced situation with no leverage.
Their situation was bad any way they played it.
Theodore is a good building block but I'm not happy the Ducks are basically unhurt on their current roster.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Matty81 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-21-2017, 08:58 AM
|
#19
|
Commie Referee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
|
Theodore is a very good young player. Vegas does well here IMO. Win-win for both teams.
|
|
|
06-21-2017, 09:01 AM
|
#20
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
How would they have gotten Manson or Silfverberg?
The rumoured deal has been in place for awhile. As pointed out numerous times, had the deal not been in place the Ducks likely buyout Bieksa and trade Vatanen to a team like the Leafs who had a protection spot and were rumoured to be in on him for a year.
Then the Ducks protect:
Andrew Cogliano
Ryan Getzlaf
Ryan Kesler
Corey Perry
Rickard Rakell
Jakob Silfverberg
Antoine Vermette
Josh Manson
Cam Fowler
Hampus Lindholm
John Gibson
Vegas gets the option of Boll, Stoner or an non-bought-out Despres. A laughable alternative to Theodore, if this is true.
Instead, Vegas and the Ducks, apparently, came to a deal where the Ducks didn't need to buyout Bieksa, didn't need to trade Vatanen and Vegas gets an infinitely better player than Jared Boll on an expiring contract.
If you're talking about playoffs in the future, having a player like Theodore actually maybe gives you a chance in the somewhat near future...replacing him with Boll and it's a laughable probability.
If anything, Vegas made out like bandits if this ends up being true.
|
Well, it seems the Ducks really want Vatanen on their team. Or couldn't get a trading partner willing to pay their price. Or both.
The Ducks are still in "win now" mode. So they figure they need to keep their top 4 intact, and if they trade Vatanen, they can't get a top 4 defenceman back (or Vegas just takes whoever is unprotected).
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 PM.
|
|