Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-21-2017, 04:48 AM   #1
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Ducks Vegas claims Stoner from Ducks. Does not pick Manson/Vatanen and gets Theodore

Bob McKenzie‏Verified account @TSNBobMcKenzie
Replying to @TSNBobMcKenzie
Let's start with ANA. The belief is VGK will claim Clayton Stoner, pass on Manson/Vatanen and, in return for all that, get Shea Theodore.

Bob McKenzie‏Verified account @TSNBobMcKenzie
Replying to @TSNBobMcKenzie
I can't report that as a dead-set certain fact but there is a strong sense that is the ANA-VGK deal or something close to it.

Last edited by sureLoss; 06-21-2017 at 08:12 PM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 04:50 AM   #2
Love
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Think there should just me a massive "GDT" or Vegas Thread to encompass all of the news that will be surrounding that franchise in the next few days because surely this is the first of many.
Love is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 05:18 AM   #3
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Manson>Theodore. I guess McPhee is playing nice. Trying to build relationships...
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 05:21 AM   #4
FireGilbert
Franchise Player
 
FireGilbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
Exp:
Default

Not sure why McPhee is doing any favours for a divisional rival but I guess he thinks two players are better than one.

Also, thanks sureLoss for getting up early to share all the expansion rumours!
__________________
The masses of humanity have always had to surf.
FireGilbert is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FireGilbert For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 05:25 AM   #5
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireGilbert View Post
Not sure why McPhee is doing any favours for a divisional rival but I guess he thinks two players are better than one.

Also, thanks sureLoss for getting up early to share all the expansion rumours!
Or he felt that Anaheim had options of buying out Bieska, and trading Vatanan, such that his return is actually better than what he might have gotten.

I doubt he's doing any favours, and likely really likes his return.
The Cobra is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 05:26 AM   #6
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff View Post
Manson>Theodore. I guess McPhee is playing nice. Trying to build relationships...
Not really about playing nice.

If Vegas and Ducks don't agree to this deal before protection lists were submitted the following happens:

1. Ducks buyout Bieksa
2. Ducks trade Vatanen
3. Vegas gets their choice of Boll, Kerdiles, Shaw, Carrick, Wagner, Tropp, Etem, Stoner, Megna, Tokarski in the expansion draft

At least this way Vegas gets a decent prospect out of it too.

Last edited by sureLoss; 06-21-2017 at 05:30 AM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 05:42 AM   #7
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

I think trading Vatanen would have been easier said than done. Defense was harder to protect and I don't believe any expansion-eligible defensemen were traded during the window. Mostly I was just looking forward to the Ducks getting boned.
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 05:55 AM   #8
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Nah it would have been easy to trade D. There were more than enough teams that had extra protection slots. Teams like Toronto, Phoenix, Montreal etc. Heck even Buffalo and Jersey had slots and traded for Beaulieu and Mueller before the trade freeze and used them.

The difference is the teams like the Ducks and Wild felt they were better off paying the "expansion tax" to Vegas than getting the returns for their d-men via trade to another team.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 06:07 AM   #9
StrykerSteve
Ass Handler
 
StrykerSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
Exp:
Default

Theodore still a good young defenceman, Vegas makes out well here.
StrykerSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to StrykerSteve For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 07:21 AM   #10
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Bit of a headscratcher for me. I like Theodore but Vatanen is still young and established... Would think he is worth way more in a trade.
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 07:28 AM   #11
Superfraggle
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81 View Post
Bit of a headscratcher for me. I like Theodore but Vatanen is still young and established... Would think he is worth way more in a trade.
For Anaheim, they'd rather keep Vatanen on their roster than trade him. For Vegas, as SureLoss pointed out, that wasn't going to be an option, as Anaheim wouldn't have exposed him without a deal in place.
Superfraggle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 07:29 AM   #12
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81 View Post
Bit of a headscratcher for me. I like Theodore but Vatanen is still young and established... Would think he is worth way more in a trade.
Straight up Theodore is probably more attractive to VGK. Younger, cheaper, further from UFA.

Theodore is exactly the type of asset they want most. Young, skilled, on the cusp of making the NHL. He could be a key cog for them for a decade.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 07:32 AM   #13
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

So then make them trade him and take Manson or Silfverberberg if they wouldn't pay fair value. Your team has a way better chance of making the playoffs with Anaheim dismantling a bit so I don't see why they let them off.

That said Theodore is a great prospect. Just disappointed the ducks got off a bit easy compared to some of the other rumored deals of 1st rounders and solid players to protect lesser guys than Vatanen/Manson
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 07:36 AM   #14
icecube
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: compton
Exp:
Default

This would sting for the Ducks as much as the Flames losing the 16th overall pick would. Or worse. Theodore is probably a better d prospect than anything we have in the system.
icecube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to icecube For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 07:39 AM   #15
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81 View Post
So then make them trade him and take Manson or Silfverberberg if they wouldn't pay fair value. Your team has a way better chance of making the playoffs with Anaheim dismantling a bit so I don't see why they let them off.

That said Theodore is a great prospect. Just disappointed the ducks got off a bit easy compared to some of the other rumored deals of 1st rounders and solid players to protect lesser guys than Vatanen/Manson
I think Theodore is worth as much as Manson or Silfverberg and worth more than a mid-late 1st or Vatanen. Young defencemen are one of the most valuable assets in the league
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 08:03 AM   #16
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Well this is getting ridiculous. Stoner is a depth D but Theodore is already a top 4, potential top 2. I had no expectation that the cost for Vegas to pick the guy you want them to would be this high. If things keep going this way and they make a couple of good moves, it's not even crazy to think Vegas has a shot at a wild card berth.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 08:33 AM   #17
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81 View Post
So then make them trade him and take Manson or Silfverberberg if they wouldn't pay fair value. Your team has a way better chance of making the playoffs with Anaheim dismantling a bit so I don't see why they let them off.

That said Theodore is a great prospect. Just disappointed the ducks got off a bit easy compared to some of the other rumored deals of 1st rounders and solid players to protect lesser guys than Vatanen/Manson
How would they have gotten Manson or Silfverberg?

The rumoured deal has been in place for awhile. As pointed out numerous times, had the deal not been in place the Ducks likely buyout Bieksa and trade Vatanen to a team like the Leafs who had a protection spot and were rumoured to be in on him for a year.

Then the Ducks protect:
Andrew Cogliano
Ryan Getzlaf
Ryan Kesler
Corey Perry
Rickard Rakell
Jakob Silfverberg
Antoine Vermette
Josh Manson
Cam Fowler
Hampus Lindholm
John Gibson

Vegas gets the option of Boll, Stoner or an non-bought-out Despres. A laughable alternative to Theodore, if this is true.

Instead, Vegas and the Ducks, apparently, came to a deal where the Ducks didn't need to buyout Bieksa, didn't need to trade Vatanen and Vegas gets an infinitely better player than Jared Boll on an expiring contract.

If you're talking about playoffs in the future, having a player like Theodore actually maybe gives you a chance in the somewhat near future...replacing him with Boll and it's a laughable probability.

If anything, Vegas made out like bandits if this ends up being true.
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Oling_Roachinen For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 08:54 AM   #18
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

I think Vegas did well but I don't think it would have been as easy as just flip the script and move on that easily for the Ducks. Bieksa is on a 35+ contract so a buyout opens the protection spot but would be a brutal dead cap space of 4 mil this year. The ducks are almost at the cap. Vatanen could have been traded for a very poor return in a forced situation with no leverage.

Their situation was bad any way they played it.

Theodore is a good building block but I'm not happy the Ducks are basically unhurt on their current roster.
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Matty81 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 08:58 AM   #19
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Theodore is a very good young player. Vegas does well here IMO. Win-win for both teams.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2017, 09:01 AM   #20
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
How would they have gotten Manson or Silfverberg?

The rumoured deal has been in place for awhile. As pointed out numerous times, had the deal not been in place the Ducks likely buyout Bieksa and trade Vatanen to a team like the Leafs who had a protection spot and were rumoured to be in on him for a year.

Then the Ducks protect:
Andrew Cogliano
Ryan Getzlaf
Ryan Kesler
Corey Perry
Rickard Rakell
Jakob Silfverberg
Antoine Vermette
Josh Manson
Cam Fowler
Hampus Lindholm
John Gibson

Vegas gets the option of Boll, Stoner or an non-bought-out Despres. A laughable alternative to Theodore, if this is true.

Instead, Vegas and the Ducks, apparently, came to a deal where the Ducks didn't need to buyout Bieksa, didn't need to trade Vatanen and Vegas gets an infinitely better player than Jared Boll on an expiring contract.

If you're talking about playoffs in the future, having a player like Theodore actually maybe gives you a chance in the somewhat near future...replacing him with Boll and it's a laughable probability.

If anything, Vegas made out like bandits if this ends up being true.
Well, it seems the Ducks really want Vatanen on their team. Or couldn't get a trading partner willing to pay their price. Or both.

The Ducks are still in "win now" mode. So they figure they need to keep their top 4 intact, and if they trade Vatanen, they can't get a top 4 defenceman back (or Vegas just takes whoever is unprotected).
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy