Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-17-2017, 12:41 PM   #421
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Par View Post
Honestly I was hoping for Braden Holtby or Carey Price, I even made like a dozen proposals
Hahahahahahaha. So out to lunch. Come join us in reality please
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2017, 12:42 PM   #422
Poison
First Line Centre
 
Poison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: On Jessica Albas chest
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkGio View Post
Yeah but Elliott sucked too
Soooo we upgraded our goaltending then.
Poison is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Poison For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2017, 12:42 PM   #423
PugnaciousIntern
First Line Centre
 
PugnaciousIntern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Well, if nothing else he will be entertaining!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-APC9sERqQY
PugnaciousIntern is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to PugnaciousIntern For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2017, 12:42 PM   #424
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

I am typically pessimistic when it comes to this team, but I am really quite satisfied with this trade.

Smith isn't the answer for this team, and he isn't expected to be. He'll be a short-term stopgap, but I think he will be a good stopgap.

I think the Flames are very high on Parsons and could see him take a similar path to somebody like Murray on the Penguins.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2017, 12:42 PM   #425
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
My guess is they try to grab Grubauer or Pickard from Vegas tomorrow as well.
Trying to grab a goalie from Vegas would be nice. I like the idea of putting a young back up in a position to steal Smith's Job.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 12:43 PM   #426
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow View Post
Smith is a great team guy but one more knee injury away from his career ending. I definitely think he'll regress and be hated more than Roman Turek next season.
why do you post on this forum anymore
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2017, 12:43 PM   #427
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
Schneider for Brouwer. Duh
That would be sweet if we could have swung that

Minus something that saw a very major Flames piece going the other way (which maybe is the better way to go but would have also caused mass panic on here) a stop gap solution and a goalie options that wasn't going to leave us all feeling 100% confident is all this team really had left for options in my opinion.

I'm happier with Smith than Elliott. Are there better goalies out there, for sure but all of those would have cost us a major piece of this rebuild, a big give to get.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 12:43 PM   #428
Beninho
Franchise Player
 
Beninho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Francisco
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
I am typically pessimistic when it comes to this team, but I am really quite satisfied with this trade.

Smith isn't the answer for this team, and he isn't expected to be. He'll be a short-term stopgap, but I think he will be a good stopgap.

I think the Flames are very high on Parsons and could see him take a similar path to somebody like Murray on the Penguins.
Someone who gets it
Beninho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 12:43 PM   #429
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squiggs96 View Post
I'm not a Smith fan by any stretch, but your view is fairly pessimistic. It's not on Par's level of hysteria, but still looking at the worst case of a good scenario.
Whoa, you're taking my post way too seriously. It wasn't pessimistic at all. Just something that occurred to me.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 12:43 PM   #430
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
Literally anybody else. Elliott, Raanta.. But Steve Mason would have been my preferred option at this point. UFA, young-ish, decent numbers.
A Smith/Mason tandem is still a possibility.
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 12:43 PM   #431
Murph
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Murph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bonavista, Newfoundland
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Yeah but even Dreger also tweeted that it is possible for Johnson to come back to Calgary, suggesting whoever they are talking to in Calgary is feeding them that information.
If the Flames are planning on signing Johnson, why not trade Elliott's rights instead? It serves the same purpose for the Coyotes.
Murph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 12:44 PM   #432
Par
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Hahahahahahaha. So out to lunch. Come join us in reality please

I thought that Brad would be able pull out a Dougie Hamilton trade.
Par is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 12:44 PM   #433
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

I have no problem with this trade, they didn't give up much, with the Flames depth in terms of blueline prospects something had to give.

I like Smith because of the way he plays the puck, a dimension that Elliot was terrible at, and he still had decent stats behind a terrible Yotes team.

Smith with his puck playing ability and the Flames defense in front of him is already an improvement over what Elliot would bring.

There wasn't much else out there goalie wise. and we got a break on the dollars.

Look, this team made the playoffs in spite of the goaltending last year, and Mike Smith is a starting caliber goalie.

With Vegas probably grabbing a few goalies tomorrow, I don't doubt that we'll know what the Flames have in the crease by next week.

At the same time, maybe its time to see what Gilles can do when pushed.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2017, 12:45 PM   #434
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
I am typically pessimistic when it comes to this team, but I am really quite satisfied with this trade.

Smith isn't the answer for this team, and he isn't expected to be. He'll be a short-term stopgap, but I think he will be a good stopgap.

I think the Flames are very high on Parsons and could see him take a similar path to somebody like Murray on the Penguins.
Yep I think there's a clear reason the Flames were reportedly in on Fleury and Smith. 2 year contracts and good stopgaps.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 12:45 PM   #435
iloveicedhockey
First Line Centre
 
iloveicedhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Murph View Post
If the Flames are planning on signing Johnson, why not trade Elliott's rights instead? It serves the same purpose for the Coyotes.
We lose another 3rd to the blues...
iloveicedhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to iloveicedhockey For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2017, 12:45 PM   #436
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
Trying to grab a goalie from Vegas would be nice. I like the idea of putting a young back up in a position to steal Smith's Job.
Those goalies likely cost as much as Smith to acquire or moreso. And then we're blocking the way for Rittich/Gillies/Parsoms. Rather bring Johnson back for a year and then look to promote a young goalie the year after.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 12:45 PM   #437
TopChed
Powerplay Quarterback
 
TopChed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
Trying to grab a goalie from Vegas would be nice. I like the idea of putting a young back up in a position to steal Smith's Job.
I've been hoping for coreau. Not because I know anything about him, but because of the debate about whether Detroit would feel they should protect him over Mrazek and Howard.
TopChed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 12:45 PM   #438
Hockey-and_stuff
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Par View Post
I thought that Brad would be able pull out a Dougie Hamilton trade.
That kind of trade is rare in any situation. I doubt Brad gets a deal that good the rest of his career.

Sent from my LG-H915 using Tapatalk
Hockey-and_stuff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockey-and_stuff For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2017, 12:45 PM   #439
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Coyotes make the trade official:

https://www.nhl.com/coyotes/news/coy...th/c-289970792
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 12:45 PM   #440
Fan in Exile
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taxbuster View Post
I'm OK with this trade - not a waste of assets and I'm willing to trust Tre (unlike the apparently many Debby Downers here). Flames have struggled with goalie issues for years now, so I'm happy to see a stopgap solution - though last year's attempt was also reasonable - in the hope that we actually *develop* our own goalies. This is the only way I can see to do so. And if one or more do develop and become our stud goalie, well, that's even better.
Treliving on the balance has done a good job but why has he earned your trust on goaltending? Name one good move so far. His moves have been defensible at best. He has missed out on several better options for the team which would have cost less as a sum total. I can tolerate Smith on this deal but nothing to do cartwheels over. I will be disappointed if Johnson is back because one of the silver lings here is Rittich or Gillies emerging as a back-up. Our over-ripening philosophy just caused us to basically lose Hickey for nothing.
Fan in Exile is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy