[GT] Game 2: Flames v. Ducks. CBC.

[edn88]

The only reason any of the Flames players were interfering was because they were being interfered with as well...

[CorsiHockeyLeague]

Look, you did that "throw it in the crease" thing one time and it was almost a good goal. Just keep doing it. You'll get more.

[Ullr]

So Gibson scores on himself and it's called off. What the ****

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using Tapatalk

[GirlySports]

Originally Posted by kevman

What's the refs reason? In a bar, can't hear the colour.

Goaltender interference

[thymebalm]

I would love to hear the explanation of that ruling.

[Nsd1]

Keep attacking the net, they'll get one again.

[calgaryblood]

Lol that duck loses his stick hooking gio and no call.

[Gaudfather]

SC Playoffs and denied Flames goals always go together!

[Mattman]

So not only do we have to win 4 games vs the Ducks but they have to beat the NHL too? Yikes

[JetsFlamesFan]

Originally Posted by Ashasx

Remember when Elliott was pushed into the net and the goal counted?

Oh yes, we remember.

[FireGilbert]

So angry right now. How does the call on the ice stand when they didn't make a call on the ice?????!!!!!

[OmegaV4]

Originally Posted by thymebalm

I would love to hear the explanation of that ruling.

Should be an interesting 2nd Intermission.

[Kswiss]

Yeah, good call on the no challenge

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally Posted by Zoller

Dave Cameron talking some sense into GG. He knows we don't win challanges

Yeah, we'd lose it, smart decision. Team is playing great just keep plugging away at it and not get deflated from a decision against.

[Yrebmi]

This is why all goal challenges have to goto Toronto or whatever. Asking the officials to overule themselves is such clear bias. Moronic

Obviously GG can't challenge them
Well look again OK? Bah!!

[Strange Brew]

Don't need an iffy goal or a fluke. Ducks are primed to be beaten. TCOB Flames.

[btimbit]

What a joke

[Angelino]

Put wideman in next game so he can crush another ref.

[djsFlames]

The interference appears to be after it's already in.

It's messy but it's a goal I think.

[Maritime Q-Scout]

I'd have to see the thing again in slow motion to see if Bennett was in the crease before the puck or not. That's the only argument for interference I can think of.

I thought it was a good goal, but I didn't think the NHL would call it a goal.

The non-challenge was smart. We never win those.