View Poll Results: Who would you like to see the Flames play in the first round
|
Chicago
|
  
|
159 |
51.46% |
Anaheim
|
  
|
150 |
48.54% |
04-07-2017, 07:43 PM
|
#241
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan
I heard somewhere that the Ducks planned the season to start out slow and peak for the playoffs so they wouldn't have their usual collapse. It looks like they are accomplishing that. I'm not really sure who I want to play but if we win we'll probably have fewer beat up players after a series against Chicago.
|
Last season , the Ducks were a bottom 5 team in the Western Conference the first 50 games.
|
|
|
04-07-2017, 09:40 PM
|
#242
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss
Anyone picking Chicago just haven't seen them play recently because the Flames haven't played them in ages. They are the better team and have a much better coach.
|
I've seen them play lately and agree they are the better team. I don't like the Flames' chances either way but like them better against Chicago. They've atleast been able to win at the United Center in the last 11 years.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Inferno For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-07-2017, 11:18 PM
|
#243
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Singapore
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle
While I like the outcome in you scenario, not sure dropping the first two games in Anaheim would be ideal, and I'm not sure Chicago is the ideal option for the conference final ��
|
Also, the Oilers winning a playoff round is never ideal.
__________________
Shot down in Flames!
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 08:38 AM
|
#244
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
|
NHL Public Relations @PR_NHL The @AnaheimDucks, @StLouisBlues, @NHLFlames and @PredsNHL have the potential to lock up playoff seeds today. #StanleyCup
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 08:49 AM
|
#245
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I like the matchup with the Ducks, because if the Flames go into the Honda Center and win Game 1, it completely changes everything. Even winning Game 2 makes things interesting.
Of course, if they lose the first 2 like everyone expects, then it's the same old story. But I like that opportunity to instantly flip the narrative.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Slanter For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-08-2017, 09:00 AM
|
#246
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jschick88
NHL Public Relations @PR_NHL The @AnaheimDucks, @StLouisBlues, @NHLFlames and @PredsNHL have the potential to lock up playoff seeds today. #StanleyCup

|
So I'm new to this new wildcard format. If we win tonight and clich first wildcard, we play who?
__________________
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 09:02 AM
|
#247
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cap Hell
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman
So I'm new to this new wildcard format. If we win tonight and clich first wildcard, we play who?
|
Anaheim or Mulletville
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3 Justin 3
All I saw was Godzilla. 
|
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 09:06 AM
|
#248
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Vandelay
Anaheim or Mulletville
|
Ha I knew that but how is it decided who plays who?
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Wolfman For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-08-2017, 09:07 AM
|
#249
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Section 222
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman
Ha I knew that but how is it decided who plays who?
|
Out of the top teams in each division, the one with the highest points plays the lowest wildcard.
__________________
Go Flames Go!!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rhettzky For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-08-2017, 09:15 AM
|
#250
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Do you prefer Anaheim or Chicago in Round 1?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
Just looking at highlights of the beating Ana laid on Chicago, I'm even more convinced we need to drop tomorrow's game vs SJS. I'd rather a tougher round 2 matchup in the Central than deal with Anaheim to start.
|
Chicago didn't dress their top players, they likely knew it would be a goon fest as it always seems to be with the ducks. I wouldn't use this one game as a measuring stick.
The flames are in tough no matter who they face in the 1st round unless it happens to be the Oilers (highly unlikely) because historically they haven't had the success against these power house teams. That being said I think the series against the ducks in 2015 will look nothing like this years series if we play them and I hope we do. The Hawks are just too good, better than the Ducks and most teams in the league. The flames don't really match up well against the ducks if we play their style as everyone has said but we will have to play their game to beat them on some level. The coaches need to focus on the games the ducks lost this year and why, for example our game in December when we kicked their asses and the 4 losses they had at home this past season, focus on what those teams did.
I hope MT, MF, and our 4th line can maintain focus but walk that fine line and agitate just as well as the ducks can. There is no way we can stick to just our style of play and win, we have to be able to adapt and play our style and theirs to beat them. Sometimes we won't have a choice because the ducks are that good, beat them at their own game (at particular moments) and we have a chance.
Ducks in the first round over the Hawks for sure.
__________________
"You're worried about the team not having enough heart. I'm worried about the team not having enough brains." HFOil fan, August 12th, 2020. E=NG
Last edited by foshizzle11; 04-08-2017 at 09:19 AM.
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 09:22 AM
|
#251
|
First Line Centre
|
Flames have a much stronger bottom 6 upfront then hawks. If the flames can someone limit the kane/panarin duo especially....then they have a good shot.
7 10+ goal scorers for hawks but 12 for flames. It will come down to limiting their top 6 and PP
Last edited by Husky; 04-08-2017 at 09:25 AM.
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 09:27 AM
|
#252
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Turner Valley
|
I'm actually pulling for the Ducks. I'm down in Palm Springs on Wednesday and would be great to make the drive into LA to watch Game 1 if they play there. What better way to kill the curse than to see them do it live?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to the-rasta-masta For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-08-2017, 10:21 AM
|
#253
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
To me Chicago is just a better verison of the Flames. They are relatively similar built teams but Chicago is better, so the only way you win is if Elliott stands on his head.
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 11:29 AM
|
#254
|
RealtorŪ
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Do I understand this correctly.
Flames win tonight or Nashville loses in regulation (start at 5pm so flames know by puck drop) = guarantee to either play the ducks or oilers.
Ducks have 101 pts 1 gr
Oilers have 99 - 2 gr
If the ducks lose their final game and Edmonton wins 1 of the 2 game they will be tied for 101 pts. Who has the tiebreak to be #1? Based on the percentages I assume the ducks still have the tie break and Edmonton would need 3 of 4 points with the ducks losing their last game.
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 11:49 AM
|
#255
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
I believe the Ducks own the 2nd tie break on the Oil if both teams are tied in ROW
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 11:58 AM
|
#256
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
I believe the Ducks own the 2nd tie break on the Oil if both teams are tied in ROW
|
Nov. 15 Ducks 4 Oilers 1 Honda Centre
Dec. 3. Oilers 3 Ducks 2 OT Rogers Centre
Jan. 25 Oilers 4 Ducks 0 Honda Centre
Mar. 22 Ducks 4 Oilers 3 Honda Centre
Apr. 1 Oilers 3 Ducks 2 OT Rogers Centre
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 12:04 PM
|
#257
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
So the Oilers are 3-2 and the Ducks are 2-1-2 head to head, both with 6 points.
Who wins that tiebreaker?? Would a 3rd one be needed?
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 12:04 PM
|
#258
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsquared1967
Nov. 15 Ducks 4 Oilers 1 Honda Centre
Dec. 3. Oilers 3 Ducks 2 OT Rogers Centre
Jan. 25 Oilers 4 Ducks 0 Honda Centre
Mar. 22 Ducks 4 Oilers 3 Honda Centre
Apr. 1 Oilers 3 Ducks 2 OT Rogers Centre
|
Yah the first game wouldn't be included so the Oilers have the tie breaker. So if the ducks lose and the Oilers win both they need to win at least 1 in regulation or OT to tie in ROW.
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 12:06 PM
|
#259
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Realtor 1
Do I understand this correctly.
Flames win tonight or Nashville loses in regulation (start at 5pm so flames know by puck drop) = guarantee to either play the ducks or oilers.
Ducks have 101 pts 1 gr
Oilers have 99 - 2 gr
If the ducks lose their final game and Edmonton wins 1 of the 2 game they will be tied for 101 pts. Who has the tiebreak to be #1? Based on the percentages I assume the ducks still have the tie break and Edmonton would need 3 of 4 points with the ducks losing their last game.
|
Ducks are at 103, so the oilers need to win both games and the Ducks lose theirs. Then both would be at 103. Then tiebreakers will have to get involved. If the Oilers win both of their games in regulation or overtime then they would have more ROW. If one of their wins comes in a shoot out, then I don't know what happens next.
|
|
|
04-08-2017, 12:06 PM
|
#260
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiggy_12
So the Oilers are 3-2 and the Ducks are 2-1-2 head to head, both with 6 points.
Who wins that tiebreaker?? Would a 3rd one be needed?
|
First home game of the team that hosted 3 isn't included.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Weitz For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:40 AM.
|
|