View Poll Results: Should the Flames add Iginla if the cost is reasonable?
|
Yes
|
  
|
357 |
50.78% |
No
|
  
|
346 |
49.22% |
02-24-2017, 11:46 AM
|
#161
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkGio
I don't want Iggy to come here. Not because I don't like Iggy or I think he would harm the team, but because he deserves better. The Flames are a marginal playoff team who would be an underdog in all their playoff series. Iggy deserves a cup favorite.
|
So who is this cup favorite that could fit him in?
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 11:49 AM
|
#162
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus
So who is this cup favorite that could fit him in?
|
Any cup contender can fit him in with salary retained.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 11:50 AM
|
#163
|
One of the Nine
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Sector 2814
|
Iggy will have a lot of interest from any serious contender, one of the best power forwards in the history of the game who can still contribute in a limited role with a good amount of playoff experience. For a team like the Flames that might not even make the playoffs it just doesn't make sense for either side.
I don't think we see Iggy go until players like Eaves are out of the way though.
__________________
"In brightest day, in blackest night / No evil shall escape my sight / Let those who worship evil's might / Beware my power, Green Lantern's light!"
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 11:51 AM
|
#164
|
Franchise Player
|
Who are the cup contenders...there are like 3 IMO
and then a bunch of teams that might catch fire
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2017, 11:55 AM
|
#165
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Calgary
|
No. Fata no. No.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 11:58 AM
|
#166
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sweden
|
If his name was Ronald McCracken would anyone want him?
No.
Past glory.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 12:00 PM
|
#167
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dajazz
If his name was Ronald McCracken would anyone want him?
No.
Past glory.
|
Hells yes I would. I'm sad now that I can't purchase a Ronald McCracken jersey.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mrdonkey For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2017, 12:04 PM
|
#168
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
|
For a fan group that was lamenting the departure of Garnet freaking Hathaway, we sure have "high standards".
It would be nice to have that kind of shot on the power play....and yes, he still has the shot.
Not saying it should happen, but the notion that it makes zero sense is pretty damn suspect.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Brewmaster For This Useful Post:
|
Brick,
edn88,
Flamesfan2010,
getbak,
GullFoss,
Iniggywetrust,
JT45,
Kipper_3434,
manwiches,
Pellanor,
Young_Guns,
Yrebmi
|
02-24-2017, 12:13 PM
|
#170
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
WHY would the Avs do this
lets be realistic
|
On paper it looks like a trade, oddly enough. Points are about the same, Wideman has better +\-, 10 years younger.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 12:34 PM
|
#171
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
I'm not sure how effective he is anymore, but I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't be excited to see it happen.
|
This is exactly where I think most of us would come out on the whole thing. Does it make a ton of sense? Probably not. Would we all have a lump in our throats if we heard Beesley belt out "Jaroooooooooooome Iginlaaaaaa!?" Just one more time.
You're damn right we would. Every single one of us.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Racki For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2017, 12:41 PM
|
#172
|
Scoring Winger
|
Would love to see him don the Flames red one more time.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 12:42 PM
|
#173
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dajazz
If his name was Ronald McCracken would anyone want him?
No.
Past glory.
|
Disagree, I for one would love to see any McCracken suit up for the Flames.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 12:42 PM
|
#174
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
So many hormones in this thread.
|
Sports is all about hormones bud.
Ya like the Jays? Any hormones when Joey Bats did the batflip? How about the Joe Carter walk off? Any hormones on that one?
When Lanny went top shelf in the Forum there were a few hormones for sure...
__________________
Last edited by Racki; 02-24-2017 at 12:49 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Racki For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2017, 12:46 PM
|
#175
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cambodia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dajazz
If his name was Ronald McCracken would anyone want him?
No.
Past glory.
|
Is his name Ronald McCracken? No? Is he not the best Flame ever? Have a heart. Remember what it means to be a fan. I'm drunk, but I don't think that's the only reason I'm saying this: if you're against Iginla returning to the Flames, you're a bad person (it was either this or calling my pro-Trump aunt a racist on Facebook). Exhibit A: Tinordi.
Last edited by gargamel; 02-24-2017 at 01:13 PM.
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 12:57 PM
|
#176
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
I did vote no. But depending on how the deal would look, I could possibly be swayed to yes. My concern is that for a team like the Flames, it's more than just adding the player. The history, the personality etc. The team has pretty much changed over since he left, but I still wonder if he can come in now and follow the lead of Backlund, and Giordano. The team has been playing okay, getting good results of late. I don't know if upgrading the lower part of the roster with a large personality helps enough.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 12:59 PM
|
#177
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
|
I'm nostalgic. I'd love to see Iggy in Flames colors and part of a deep (deep) playoff run and then he retires from the game a Flame (hopefully with a cup).
I agree Iginla with Johnny and Sean would be interesting.
And if for nothing else, getting Iggy to Calgary instead of Edmonton is worth it as well.
Finally - if Iggy does go to Edmonton and the Flames cannot win a cup, I'd be OK with him winning one in Edmonton. There are more important things in life than hating on a dirty town with a terrible road system.
__________________
GO FLAMES GO
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 01:05 PM
|
#178
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: So Long, Bannatyne
|
I voted "yes" even though I hope we don't. (But I hope we do so I can be like: "Well, wasn't the correct decision, BUT I guess we'll just have to deal with it...")
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 01:08 PM
|
#179
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edn88
I'm nostalgic. I'd love to see Iggy in Flames colors and part of a deep (deep) playoff run and then he retires from the game a Flame (hopefully with a cup).
I agree Iginla with Johnny and Sean would be interesting.
And if for nothing else, getting Iggy to Calgary instead of Edmonton is worth it as well.
Finally - if Iggy does go to Edmonton and the Flames cannot win a cup, I'd be OK with him winning one in Edmonton. There are more important things in life than hating on a dirty town with a terrible road system.
|
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
__________________
Oliver Kylington is the greatest and best player in the world
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bigrangy For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2017, 01:12 PM
|
#180
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fort St. John, BC
|
Rather Iggy on the top line than Ferland. Rather Ferland on the 4th line than Chiasson.
Seems simple to me. Not seeing the harm in bringing him in
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:55 AM.
|
|