02-08-2017, 11:28 AM
|
#81
|
GOAT!
|
Re: McDavid re-signing... I can't remember what Crosby got on his first deal out of entry. Did he get max $ x term?
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 11:33 AM
|
#82
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
Re: McDavid re-signing... I can't remember what Crosby got on his first deal out of entry. Did he get max $ x term?
|
Crosby's caphit for his 2nd contract was 8.7 starting in 2008-2009, the max salary at the time was $11.34m.
NHL max salary this season is $14.6m. McDavid gonna get paid.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-08-2017, 11:35 AM
|
#83
|
Norm!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
Re: McDavid re-signing... I can't remember what Crosby got on his first deal out of entry. Did he get max $ x term?
|
9 million a year for 5 years, and the NHL salary cap in 2008-2009 was 56 million. so 16% of the cap.
so even going by that if the cap stays at 73 million it would be 11.7 million dollars per year.
The average salary of 8.7 came about because the last year of the contract was about 4.5 million, that's not allowed anymore.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-08-2017, 11:40 AM
|
#84
|
Franchise Player
|
so basically what you guys are saying is:
EDM has the best player for the next 10 years but will likely be crippled by the salary he will command (due to the high probability of max contract offers from other teams like LV). As Flames fans we will get to see him often, on a unbalanced EDM or Vegas team that will pose no real threat once the post season arrives each year because of how easily teams will be able to shut his one dangerous line down.
Is that about right? I can live with that.
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 11:44 AM
|
#85
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose
so basically what you guys are saying is:
EDM has the best player for the next 10 years but will likely be crippled by the salary he will command (due to the high probability of max contract offers from other teams like LV). As Flames fans we will get to see him often, on a unbalanced EDM or Vegas team that will pose no real threat once the post season arrives each year because of how easily teams will be able to shut his one dangerous line down.
Is that about right? I can live with that.
|
And thus I assume everyone in Calgary is glad they didn't get saddled with McDavid?
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Ruttiger For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-08-2017, 11:45 AM
|
#86
|
Norm!
|
Its going to be hard for the Oilers to balance their team when 25% or more of the cap is taken up by two players.
Its the one thing going forward that teams that grasp a generational player are going to have to decide on. Do they go with an unbalanced team with little depth or find a way to balance it out.
Its easier though if you draft well and have good prospects, but realistically outside of JP, there's not a lot for their Oilers to get all that excited about because they pissed away so many picks with bad picks and bad development.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 11:52 AM
|
#87
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Where the Oil appear to be in a good spot is the blueline (believe it or not) Larson and Klefbom are signed long term under $5M and at worst they are a 2nd pairing. The Sekera contract will hurt them as will Lucic. They need to move out one or both of Nuge and Eberle to afford both Draisaitl and McDavid. I think they could dump Nuge's contract in the summer but Eberle could be tough to move without salary coming back.
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 11:59 AM
|
#88
|
Norm!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
Where the Oil appear to be in a good spot is the blueline (believe it or not) Larson and Klefbom are signed long term under $5M and at worst they are a 2nd pairing. The Sekera contract will hurt them as will Lucic. They need to move out one or both of Nuge and Eberle to afford both Draisaitl and McDavid. I think they could dump Nuge's contract in the summer but Eberle could be tough to move without salary coming back.
|
I doubt anyone is going to take Nuge without sending a contract back, he's just not worth a 6 million dollar a year hit right now.
Larson and Klefbom are both pretty good, however with the Edmonton salary structure the way its going to be they are effectively out of the free agent market, and they don't have the assets to acquire a top pairing defensemen unless Draisaitl is moved out for example.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 11:59 AM
|
#89
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North of the River, South of the Bluff
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Its going to be hard for the Oilers to balance their team when 25% or more of the cap is taken up by two players.
Its the one thing going forward that teams that grasp a generational player are going to have to decide on. Do they go with an unbalanced team with little depth or find a way to balance it out.
Its easier though if you draft well and have good prospects, but realistically outside of JP, there's not a lot for their Oilers to get all that excited about because they pissed away so many picks with bad picks and bad development.
|
Well the argument would be Chicago where 2 players are making $20MM. However, I think your last paragraph is the difference. Chicago and Pittsburgh have been able to find diamonds via draft and signing. Edmonton hasn't shown that yet, and with Lucic they showed they actually overpay for end of prime players.
Chicago has been screwed. Edmonton could do the same. It will take an outstanding GM and lots of luck. Something not seen yet.
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 12:17 PM
|
#90
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruttiger
And thus I assume everyone in Calgary is glad they didn't get saddled with McDavid?
|
I don't think glad is the word.
Of course great players are an opportunity, but they also present challenges. Teams who have a lot of their cap space invested in one or two player rely heavily on prospect development and asset management.
Flames fans are seeing the silver lining that the Oilers have struggled with prospect development and asset management, and therefore have struggled as a team.
In essence this is a recognition that star player do not equal championships, and a reminder that Edmonton is No Good.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TheIronMaiden For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-08-2017, 01:17 PM
|
#91
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDutch
Well the argument would be Chicago where 2 players are making $20MM. However, I think your last paragraph is the difference. Chicago and Pittsburgh have been able to find diamonds via draft and signing. Edmonton hasn't shown that yet, and with Lucic they showed they actually overpay for end of prime players.
Chicago has been screwed. Edmonton could do the same. It will take an outstanding GM and lots of luck. Something not seen yet.
|
The other advantage Chicago has is that Keith and Hossa have contracts that are considered illegal in this new CBA. If Chicago was paying Hossa and Keith 7.5 and 9 mil right now they would be screwed as well.
Pens have Sid on a bogus contract too
Oilers won't have this luxury and have 1 prospect that could make an impact for their team next season. I could see Drasaitl getting 7+ this summer on 7-8 years. Only way I see it less than 7 is if they go the 5-6 year route that the Flames did with their core
Mcdavid should get 10+ and he may get it on a 5 year deal which then puts the timeline to win at 5 years with guys like Eberle and Nuge on bad contracts for half of that
Next year will be a big season for the Oilers tho as Mcdavid's deal does not kick in until after next year. But Dra's starts next season so unless Nuge or Eberle get moved out they will not be able to land a PP dman that I think they need to move up the standings
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Macho0978 For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-08-2017, 01:24 PM
|
#92
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
Even at 14 per year, a guy like McDavid would still be a bargain.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 01:32 PM
|
#93
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
McDavid (and Drasaitl) contracts won't hurt Edmonton. They will get value for those. It's the Lucic contract that's going to sting Edmonton. And Nuge. And Eberle/Pouliot to some extent. Maybe Sekera as time goes on.
That said, Larsson and Talbot have pretty decent contracts.
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 02:34 PM
|
#94
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
As stated several times in numerous places around here, McDavid and Draisaitl contracts will not hurt the Oilers. They have plenty of those that still might/will though.
There will be no offer sheets. McDavid will be extended as soon as is possible, without any real negotiating. They will hand him the contract to fill in a number. The term will be of greatest interest. Does McDavid give them max term at reduced rate (meaning 10M+), or does he put a time limit to build a winner (at that reduced salary)? Like to the year before his UFA eligibility.
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 02:36 PM
|
#95
|
Franchise Player
|
Why would McDavid ask for anything but the largest salary for the longest term?
‘Oh, you're letting me write my own ticket, but I won't be greedy because I'm just that gosh-darned nice. I mean, I could suffer a career-ending injury tomorrow, and if I sign at $10m for 4 years instead of $13m for 8, I'll lose out on 64 million smackers. But hey, that's how it goes, sometimes ya gotta take one for the team.’
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 02:38 PM
|
#96
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
Why would McDavid ask for anything but the largest salary for the longest term?
‘Oh, you're letting me write my own ticket, but I won't be greedy because I'm just that gosh-darned nice. I mean, I could suffer a career-ending injury tomorrow, and if I sign at $10m for 4 years instead of $13m for 8, I'll lose out on 64 million smackers. But hey, that's how it goes, sometimes ya gotta take one for the team.’
|
Well, the only reason I can imagine is that, inconceivably, the Oilers might actually make the playoffs and whats more, not suck entirely.
Granted, this is about 90% due to McDavid himself, so yeah, if it were me I'd want to get paid.
Remove McDavid from the Oilers and they're just as terrible as ever.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 02:46 PM
|
#97
|
Franchise Player
|
That's the thing, Locke. McDavid could go to any team in the league and make the playoffs. Why play in Edmonton for less money?
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 02:48 PM
|
#98
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
Why would McDavid ask for anything but the largest salary for the longest term?
‘Oh, you're letting me write my own ticket, but I won't be greedy because I'm just that gosh-darned nice. I mean, I could suffer a career-ending injury tomorrow, and if I sign at $10m for 4 years instead of $13m for 8, I'll lose out on 64 million smackers. But hey, that's how it goes, sometimes ya gotta take one for the team.’
|
It's pretty rare for top NHL players to ask for the largest salary they can get.
If it were common there'd be a bunch of guys at the max and way less Troy Brouwers making $4+.
In general real difference makers in the NHL are pretty underpaid relative to their contributions.
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 02:49 PM
|
#99
|
Franchise Player
|
Yeah, sure, but this is Connor McDavid, not just "top NHL players". There's no one else like this.
I mean, he is a RFA, but given that there will probably be at least a dozen teams willing to give him Max x Max in an offer sheet, I guess it's hard to see this playing out any other way. Granted, the Oilers can give him eight years where any other team can only give him seven, but I don't know how much that's really worth.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
02-08-2017, 02:52 PM
|
#100
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random
That's the thing, Locke. McDavid could go to any team in the league and make the playoffs. Why play in Edmonton for less money?
|
I get it. The only reason the Oilers are even getting a sniff of success is because of him.
From an asset valuation standpoint that makes him king. He could tell them that he wants League max and a crown made out of sweatpants and rubies and they'd have to do it.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:00 PM.
|
|