| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-06-2017, 11:23 PM | #1 |  
	| Owner 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Calgary      | 
				 Flames 43 Canucks 13 
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post: |  
badger89,
 
belsarius ,
 
BloodFetish ,
 
Brick ,
 
Cheese ,
 
ComixZone ,
 
DeluxeMoustache ,
 
Dion ,
 
Gaskal ,
 
GoFlamesGo89 ,
 
GreenHardHat ,
 
Stillman16 ,
 
Vulcan ,
 
Yrebmi |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-06-2017, 11:24 PM | #2 |  
	| Acerbic Cyberbully 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: back in Chilliwack      | 
 
			
			It was actually 46-13.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2017, 09:59 AM | #3 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Good write up.  My thoughts exactly.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2017, 10:09 AM | #4 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			Despite the shot count, I thought that the Flames were underwhelming.  Too many shots from the perimeter, not enough traffic in front of Miller, and still a problem with turnovers.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2017, 12:38 PM | #5 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Salmon with Arms      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Brick  Despite the shot count, I thought that the Flames were underwhelming.  Too many shots from the perimeter, not enough traffic in front of Miller, and still a problem with turnovers. |  
I couldn't disagree more. When the goalie makes a save vs not, the chance always seems less dangerous. We had three times as many chances like the ones the Canucks scored on.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2017, 01:04 PM | #6 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist  I couldn't disagree more. When the goalie makes a save vs not, the chance always seems less dangerous. We had three times as many chances like the ones the Canucks scored on. |  
I agree to disagree.  Glen Gulutzan also mentioned that the Flames will need to play a more north south game in order to win tonight.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2017, 01:08 PM | #7 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Well, if they out-shoot them 46-13 again, I guarantee they'll win
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2017, 02:25 PM | #8 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Sunshine Coast      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Brick  Despite the shot count, I thought that the Flames were underwhelming.  Too many shots from the perimeter, not enough traffic in front of Miller, and still a problem with turnovers. |  
I agree, the Flames easily out skilled the Canucks but they didn't intimidate them. I'm looking for big games from Ferland and Hathaway tonight.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  01-07-2017, 02:29 PM | #9 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Brick  I agree to disagree.  Glen Gulutzan also mentioned that the Flames will need to play a more north south game in order to win tonight. |  
Exactly! Part of why the Backlund line is doing so well is the fact they keep it simple and shoot (accurately) a lot.
 
At least two other lines could learn from that.
		 
				 Last edited by Badgers Nose; 01-07-2017 at 02:40 PM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Badgers Nose For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:37 AM. | 
 
 
 |