[GT] Flames vs. Ducks Dec. 29

[DJones]

Originally Posted by AC

Am I alone in thinking plays like Backlund's where there was just about to be a penalty but they score anyways should still result in a penalty?

In my mind a delayed penalty should only be negated by a goal if the goalie has stepped onto the bench for the extra attacker.

No, penalties are there to negate an unfair advantage. Clearly the penalty didn't help them that much

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by AC

Am I alone in thinking plays like Backlund's where there was just about to be a penalty but they score anyways should still result in a penalty?

In my mind a delayed penalty should only be negated by a goal if the goalie has stepped onto the bench for the extra attacker.

I have sometimes thought a penalty shot that's missed should still get a penalty. Make it only 1 minute if you want.

[handgroen]

Originally Posted by AC

Am I alone in thinking plays like Backlund's where there was just about to be a penalty but they score anyways should still result in a penalty?

In my mind a delayed penalty should only be negated by a goal if the goalie has stepped onto the bench for the extra attacker.

basket plus the harm.

you wanna get serious about increasing scoring in the league, look no further fella

[Nammer403]

Eye dropper and OJ?!

[mikephoen]

Amateur hour at SN as usual.

[btimbit]

Oil and Oregeno eh? Now that's good broadcasting

[Bear]

We need a lil more oil in the oregano.

[SmoggyFlamesFan]

Originally Posted by Nammer403

Eye dropper and OJ?!

Don't forget the oil of oregano.

[Lanny's Moustache]

Originally Posted by AC

Am I alone in thinking plays like Backlund's where there was just about to be a penalty but they score anyways should still result in a penalty?

In my mind a delayed penalty should only be negated by a goal if the goalie has stepped onto the bench for the extra attacker.

Only on penalties for infractions causing physical harm like high sticking.

The reason for nullifying the delayed penalty when a goal is scored (now, not why it started) is because the penalty likely took away a scoring chance. So if you score anyways, the hook/hold/trip were rendered irrelevant.

I think calling a penalty shot should be made anytime a player has a step on the defense and then it's up to the coach to decide if he takes the shot or the 2min. Far too many PS not called when they should be and then oddly called where the player still gets off a grade-A scoring chance.

Eye dropper of oil of oregano in some OJ? Yay Sportsnet!

[Joborule]

Thanks for the tips SN.

[Drak]

Getting high behind the scenes?

[MrMastodonFarm]

I love Backlund's dislocated shoulder celebration

[MrMastodonFarm]

Oh no Roger.. oh no..we're going with a bow tie now?

[FireGilbert]

Originally Posted by AC

Am I alone in thinking plays like Backlund's where there was just about to be a penalty but they score anyways should still result in a penalty?

In my mind a delayed penalty should only be negated by a goal if the goalie has stepped onto the bench for the extra attacker.

Completely agree. Also, penaties should be the full two minutes no matter how many goals are scored.

[curves2000]

Originally Posted by Drak

Getting high behind the scenes?

Sounds more like Greek cooking. Olive oil, oregano and just add some authentic Greek feta and we have a dressing for salad and chicken wings

[Machiavelli]

Oil of oregano is an oft-used home remedy for the common child

[Lanny's Moustache]

Eric Francis on our TV's telling us how much smarter than everyone else is again.

10 more years?

Barf.

Though the alternative over on Oilers Circle-Jerk corner isn't really better either.

[btimbit]

Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm

Oh no Roger.. oh no..we're going with a bow tie now?

The man has class, I'll give him that

[ResAlien]

Bow ties are never OK.

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally Posted by FireGilbert

Also, penaties should be the full two minutes no matter how many goals are scored.

Barf. Wave good bye to 5on5 hockey.