Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-24-2006, 09:10 PM   #1
skins
Self-Ban
 
skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default NFL coming to Canada

Quote:
The NFL will play as many as two regular-season games per year outside the United States starting in 2007, with Canada, Mexico, England and Germany as possible sites for starters.
http://www.sportsnet.ca/football/nfl...24_185948_7368
skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 09:12 PM   #2
Pagal4321
Franchise Player
 
Pagal4321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I read this...it will be interesting where they hold the game though. I mean obviously the NFL would want attendance to be over 40,000 people.
Pagal4321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 09:18 PM   #3
Antithesis
Disenfranchised
 
Antithesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Exp:
Default

I doubt it would be anywhere aside from Toronto.
Antithesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 09:21 PM   #4
metallicat
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antithesis View Post
I doubt it would be anywhere aside from Toronto.
The Skydome will likely be the first choice, but I see no reason why this can't be a success in other cities such as Vancouver, Edmonton, or Calgary.
__________________
But living an honest life - for that you need the truth. That's the other thing I learned that day, that the truth, however shocking or uncomfortable, leads to liberation and dignity. -Ricky Gervais
metallicat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 09:32 PM   #5
VANFLAMESFAN
Franchise Player
 
VANFLAMESFAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maple Ridge, BC
Exp:
Default

I could see a Seahawks game coming to BC Place in the next few years. That would be sweet, if they played the PAts, I would be in heaven. Still yet to go see them as they havent been to Seattle for a long time now.
VANFLAMESFAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 09:33 PM   #6
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

I could see Edmonton being a choice after Toronto....after all they have a much larger stadium than the other big cities.

Last edited by Table 5; 10-24-2006 at 09:37 PM.
Table 5 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 09:38 PM   #7
Pagal4321
Franchise Player
 
Pagal4321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

But Toronto will OBVIOUSLY be the first choice, with Vancouver probably being second.

Calgary and Edmonton would be ignored, as would most Canadian cities.
Pagal4321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 09:40 PM   #8
Flames in 07
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pagal4321 View Post
But Toronto will OBVIOUSLY be the first choice, with Vancouver probably being second.

Calgary and Edmonton would be ignored, as would most Canadian cities.
I'd say Edm would be ahead of Vancouver ... way better facility.
Flames in 07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 09:58 PM   #9
JohnnyFlame
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Would for certain have to be Toronto. They are the only major league city in the country. If they could add the NFL to the MLB and NBA WOW!!! I heard they had some guy working on it again. An exhibition game would be a good start.
JohnnyFlame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 10:03 PM   #10
swo2k1
Crash and Bang Winger
 
swo2k1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I would suggest, that it would be Toronto and only Toronto.
swo2k1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 10:04 PM   #11
calf
broke the first rule
 
calf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyFlame View Post
An exhibition game would be a good start.
This would actually be a regular season game.

My darkhorse pick for the game is Winnipeg.
calf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 10:20 PM   #12
Sidney Crosby's Hat
Franchise Player
 
Sidney Crosby's Hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames in 07 View Post
I'd say Edm would be ahead of Vancouver ... way better facility.
Neither city has a shot. Commonwealth Stadium would be a horrible place to watch NFL football. With an NFL field the fans would be so far away from the action it wouldn't be funny.

Not to mention, although the stadium seats 60,000 it really can't handle crowds of over 45,000 in terms of concessions, washrooms, etc.

The game would have to be in September as well due to temperature considerations.

As for BC Place, it might have an outside shot but they would have to improve the turf in a big way. It's nowhere near the standards the NFL would expect.
Sidney Crosby's Hat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 11:06 PM   #13
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

I would figure the games will be in September regardless. The NFL isnt about to put a mid or late season game that could mean something in a foreign country.

If the NFL really wanted to make a big splash, and not go for the money for once, put the game in Winnipeg or Regina. Go totally off the wall.

Last edited by Resolute 14; 10-24-2006 at 11:25 PM.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 11:19 PM   #14
J pold
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Best News I have herd all day!!!
J pold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 11:24 PM   #15
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Well it sounds like one game next year and I think you can pretty much guarantee that will go to Mexico City. Toronto hosting a Bills game, or Vancouver hosting a Seahawks game are really the only two possibilities. Chances are they'd want to take two teams who aren't exactly huge revenue generators at home and have them play their first or second game of the season internationally where the game itself would be the attraction.

I could see something like a Jacksonville vs. Tennessee game being held in London on a Thursday to open the season type of thing. Both teams get 3 extra days to recover from a slightly longer flight and the time zones. Canad might get one game every two years at most.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2006, 11:42 PM   #16
Smyth94
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidney Crosby's Hat View Post
Neither city has a shot. Commonwealth Stadium would be a horrible place to watch NFL football. With an NFL field the fans would be so far away from the action it wouldn't be funny.

Not to mention, although the stadium seats 60,000 it really can't handle crowds of over 45,000 in terms of concessions, washrooms, etc.

The game would have to be in September as well due to temperature considerations.

As for BC Place, it might have an outside shot but they would have to improve the turf in a big way. It's nowhere near the standards the NFL would expect.
I wouldn't totally discount it not happening.

The Esks have put in 60,000 fans on more than a few occassions. In Canada, it is probably one of the best options, other than Toronto.

Don't count out Montreal either.
Smyth94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2006, 12:01 AM   #17
Sidney Crosby's Hat
Franchise Player
 
Sidney Crosby's Hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smyth94 View Post
I wouldn't totally discount it not happening.

The Esks have put in 60,000 fans on more than a few occassions. In Canada, it is probably one of the best options, other than Toronto.

Don't count out Montreal either.
That's true, I forgot about Olympic Stadium - turf issue there as well.

As for Edmonton, the only way the NFL comes to Edmonton is if it's the Broncos, whose owner is an Edmontonian.
Sidney Crosby's Hat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2006, 12:01 AM   #18
calf
broke the first rule
 
calf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smyth94 View Post
Don't count out Montreal either.
I'm not sure anyone will pony up the $1 mill+ to get decent turf into the Big O (since it's doubtful the Alouettes will ever play there again, save playoff games)
calf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2006, 12:23 AM   #19
Smyth94
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

Didn't both Montreal and BC get field turf?
Smyth94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2006, 12:24 AM   #20
Smyth94
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calf View Post
I'm not sure anyone will pony up the $1 mill+ to get decent turf into the Big O (since it's doubtful the Alouettes will ever play there again, save playoff games)

The Als just played there last week
Smyth94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:25 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy