12-15-2016, 01:58 PM
|
#21
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
well it will also to serve as a magnet for young Canadians to move into Vancouver and become taxpayers and contributors to the economy.
not saying I support it, but if the govt is going to spend money, at least its going into the hands of the citizens.
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 01:59 PM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
|
I dont think anyone is arguing buying in GVRD is "dumb" or they shouldnt, but the down payment rules, insurance ratios, etc, exist to protect the market as a whole.
Allowing people to borrow 100% on a high ratio mortgage is a terrible idea. We are supposed to be de-risking the market, not adding people with no downpayments into the mix. Did we not learn any lessons at all from 2008?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ducay For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-15-2016, 02:00 PM
|
#23
|
Norm!
|
geez isn't this the kind of thinking that caused all of the problems in the US when people were buying houses that they had no hope of affording?
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 02:00 PM
|
#24
|
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
|
Borrowed down payments also trigger higher high ratio insurance.
Wouldn't it be nice if CHMC or Genworth would just change their policies and say that they won't do business with anyone who gets a loan from the government. It would effectively cripple this program. I'm sure it won't happen, they like the business and have no doubt already said they won't kibosh this.
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 02:05 PM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by squiggs96
People in Vancouver have made the decision that they want the lifestyle, climate, etc. and have decided to allocate more of their earnings towards housing costs than previous generations, or other cities have. If they determine that the costs outweigh the benefits of living here, then they move to other places.
|
It isn't a question of choices, it's a question of risk. Who's on the hook when interest rates rise (they can't go any lower) and those homeowners can't make their mortgage payments? The Canadian public, that's who, through iron-clad government backing of insured mortgages.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-15-2016, 02:09 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Section 203
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
Allowing people to borrow 100% on a high ratio mortgage is a terrible idea. We are supposed to be de-risking the market, not adding people with no downpayments into the mix. Did we not learn any lessons at all from 2008?
|
The government loan will match the homebuyer's downpayment, up to 5% of the purchase price. The buyer still must come up with the remaining amount. They are still borrowing up to 95%, but it's not 100%.
__________________
My thanks equals mod team endorsement of your post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Jesus this site these days
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnet Flame
He just seemed like a very nice person. I loved Squiggy.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
I should probably stop posting at this point
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to squiggs96 For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-15-2016, 02:18 PM
|
#27
|
First Line Centre
|
Edit...nm. Thank you squiggs for clarifying
__________________
Go Flames Go
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 02:43 PM
|
#28
|
Jordan!
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
|
I just bought my first house ever, in Gilbert. AZ has a grant that pays you 5% of the home price. All I needed to do was complete an online home buyer education course.
Got in for earnest money $2100 and the grant covered down payment and all closing costs which was roughly $11k on a $220,000 home
Hell of a program, no payback either. Entirely a gift
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 02:48 PM
|
#29
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
LOL.......We are heading to a fiscal disaster.
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 02:48 PM
|
#30
|
 Posted the 6 millionth post!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow
I just bought my first house ever, in Gilbert. AZ has a grant that pays you 5% of the home price. All I needed to do was complete an online home buyer education course.
Got in for earnest money $2100 and the grant covered down payment and all closing costs which was roughly $11k on a $220,000 home
Hell of a program, no payback either. Entirely a gift
|
Are you a snowbird? Or do you work down there?
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 02:50 PM
|
#31
|
Jordan!
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
Are you a snowbird? Or do you work down there?
|
I'd be the youngest snowbird ever at 33 years old. lol
Live and work here full time since 2009, U.S. Citizen
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 02:51 PM
|
#32
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Calgary
|
Isn't the point of a down payment to prove to the bank that your not financially illiterate as well as reduce the amount you borrow?
This is so dumb.
__________________
Purveyor of fine Sarcasm
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 02:55 PM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
I'm curious to see what the proposed interest rate is on these loans (the article doesn't say). If it's less than 7%, students in the province (and anyone with remaining student loans) should be apoplectic.
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 02:57 PM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
The premier said she was not concerned the program would raise housing prices.
“Our analysis tells us that it won’t because everybody who is going to be eligible for this program will have to have been accepted for a mortgage already,” said Clark.
|
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 03:01 PM
|
#35
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
You know it's bad when the NDP are accusing you of reckless spending and racking up debt.
Quote:
NDP critic David Eby said all the province has done is encourage buyers to stack up more debt. He said the province should be using land it already owns to build affordable housing and increase supply.
Eby also pointed out that B.C.’s attempt to make it easier to enter the market flies in the face of the federal government’s tightened rules for mortgages that were designed to reduce the risk of defaulting on payments if interest rates rise.
“The federal government is trying to rein this in with changes they’ve made, and the B.C. government is saying borrow more money, instead of providing more housing that’s actually affordable, that people can afford to pay and maintain the debt on even if interest rates go up,” he said. “It’s a huge risk to take.”
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-15-2016, 03:11 PM
|
#36
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Jeeeeeesus our government is awful
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 03:11 PM
|
#37
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Section 203
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
You know it's bad when the NDP are accusing you of reckless spending and racking up debt.
|
I'm not defending the program, but citing David Eby disagreeing with Christy Clarke's position is not news. That's all he does. She could look up right now and say the sky is blue. Eby would say she's wrong and the sky is falling. He's the housing critic for the NDP. He's almost build for the US system of two parties, where the other party is wrong all the time, even if it is in your best interests.
__________________
My thanks equals mod team endorsement of your post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Jesus this site these days
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnet Flame
He just seemed like a very nice person. I loved Squiggy.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
I should probably stop posting at this point
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to squiggs96 For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-15-2016, 03:38 PM
|
#38
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by squiggs96
I'm not defending the program, but citing David Eby disagreeing with Christy Clarke's position is not news. That's all he does. She could look up right now and say the sky is blue. Eby would say she's wrong and the sky is falling. He's the housing critic for the NDP. He's almost build for the US system of two parties, where the other party is wrong all the time, even if it is in your best interests.
|
Well let's be honest here, it's been the Liberal's complete botching of the housing portfolio that's given Eby the notoriety and audience he has.
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 03:43 PM
|
#39
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by malcolmk14
Is it? I wouldn't vote for a government who did something like this!
|
Maybe smart people aren't the voters they're going after with this ill-conceived plan.
|
|
|
12-15-2016, 03:44 PM
|
#40
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
Yeah, I've got to get into the position where I can start buying things with other people's money.
|
You can. Talk to Slava; I'm sure he'd pleased to explain how.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 AM.
|
|