Gotta keep em guessing.. say one thing, then tell em we didn't mean it, then oops we had our fingers crossed it wasn't an official meeting! Haha jk we still didn't mean it we'll be nice to you Japanese. No really, give us more money. Statecraft Skill +1.
__________________ Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
The Following User Says Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
I think it is safe to say that Trump is making it up as he goes along. If wants respect, he better have some integrity whether or not a meeting is formal or informal. When two world leaders are meeting, is there truly an informal meeting where you can say, "Punked! I can't believe you thought I was telling you the truth at that practice meeting." It is one thing to tell the press corps that the night is over and then head out to dinner.
The Following User Says Thank You to wwkayaker For This Useful Post:
exactly, I say zero chance they go and pick Hillary. I hope we never have to see her face again until she is in cuffs for all the fraud her Foundation has done.
I love how Fox estimates up to 3 milling votes for Clinton may be fraudulent, and that would push Trump way past her in the pop vote.
But bottom line is the US wanted a change and the options were Dick Chaney in a pant suit for a Successful Billionaire.
Yet everyone seems to think he is going to kill ever person of colour and homosexual. Yet hes never said anything to even consider that, its all the BS the MSM has been feeding people in hopes of getting Clinton in office.
But you cant judge the guy yet, let him see what he can do, he might surprise some of you liberal moonbats.
Oh and how ironic that most of the protesters arrested in Seattle did not even vote. lol
Oh cool, Glen Beck circa 2008 is here.
And with just as many real facts!
The Following User Says Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Who knows man, Trump is far from stupid so we will just have to wait and see what he will do. I just want to see him approve the damn Key-Stone, other then that I don's care how bad he kills the US economy. But I do not believe he will start any wars.
I hope Trump does well but I have serious doubts. I care about the USA economy because we are closely tied to it. I'm not an economist, but I fear that Canada's economy will be badly depressed if the USA economy tanks.
Stop getting your definition of ironic from songs.
How about you suggest an appropriate word or term. People not bothering to vote then protesting the outcome of an election would seem to fit this pretty well
a situation that is strange or funny because things happen in a way that seems to be the opposite of what you expected
You would expect the people that actually voted and then didn't get the desired result would be upset and may go out to protest, as futile as it may be. If a person didn't vote I would not expect them to complain and then go out and protest that would make them a moron.
The Following User Says Thank You to zamler For This Useful Post:
exactly, I say zero chance they go and pick Hillary.
So do I. It would be unprecedented for the electoral college to over-turn an election, even though the popular vote when a different way, and by a substantial number. The electoral college's role to to prevent abuses of the system, not correct the decisions of stupid people.
Quote:
I hope we never have to see her face again until she is in cuffs for all the fraud her Foundation has done.
An Alex Jones reader I see. Let me guess? You also check abovetopsecret.com for your news? It is amazing how many people cannot verify the validity of stories by going to non-partisan sources who provide oversight for these interests, like charitynavigator.org. How does the Clinton Foundation stack up?
I love how Fox estimates up to 3 milling votes for Clinton may be fraudulent, and that would push Trump way past her in the pop vote.
This is total bull#### of the highest level. This would indicate voter fraud of the highest levels, which would go against the historical levels by 2,000,000%. During this election almost every single incident of voter fraud was a result of actions by Trump supporters, not Clinton supporters. This was directly a result of Trump's scare mongering and making his rube followers believing that this is a real problem, when historically, it doesn't exist.
Quote:
But bottom line is the US wanted a change and the options were Dick Chaney in a pant suit for a Successful Billionaire.
Who is the successful billionaire you speak of? Donald Trump failed to prove he was either of the above when he refuse to release his tax information. If Trump is what he claims to be, and there are lots of people who question his claims, release the documents that prove your claims. Also, what successful person claims bankruptcy six times?
Quote:
Yet everyone seems to think he is going to kill ever person of colour and homosexual. Yet hes never said anything to even consider that, its all the BS the MSM has been feeding people in hopes of getting Clinton in office.
Hyperbole doesn't help your claims in any shape or form. The MSM (tipping your hand in regards to your obvious bias) has not been promoting anything to get Clinton in office. In fact, their actions, by not properly informing the public to the reality of the biggest issue that swayed the opinion against Clinton - the use of a private server - was criminal in action. By not immediately calling Comey's comments what they were, political grandstanding, they did a disservice to the democracy they are charged to safeguard.
Quote:
But you cant judge the guy yet, let him see what he can do, he might surprise some of you liberal moonbats.
WTF is a "moonbat?"
Quote:
Oh and how ironic that most of the protesters arrested in Seattle did not even vote. lol
Proof required. Sounds and smells like bull#### to me. Kind of like there were 3,000,000 instances of voter fraud and Trump is a successful billionaire.
Last edited by Lanny_McDonald; 11-17-2016 at 08:11 PM.
The problem with the Clinton Foundation is wikileaks exposed that access for political purposes was given to some of those who donated to the Foundation. That is crooked, probably worse than the email scandals, although it didn't get as much attention.
If a person didn't vote I would not expect them to complain and then go out and protest that would make them a moron.
Would it? What about someone underage? Or someone unable to vote, or even register to vote? Are they morons?
To that post, he used irony incorrectly, and had so few facts that he didn't even get the city or state correct (the actual "most didn't vote" headline came from Portland, and was because most didn't vote IN OREGON, since a lot were from outside of Oregon, underage, and unregistered), but you're defending it anyway.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
The problem with the Clinton Foundation is wikileaks exposed that access for political purposes was given to some of those who donated to the Foundation. That is crooked, probably worse than the email scandals, although it didn't get as much attention.
I don't think it did though. There wasn't ever an actual example of pay to play as far as I ever saw.
__________________ Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
The problem with the Clinton Foundation is wikileaks exposed that access for political purposes was given to some of those who donated to the Foundation. That is crooked, probably worse than the email scandals, although it didn't get as much attention.
While that was insinuated, nothing in the leaks showed. In fact, the incredible volume of emails with no proof should really exonerate her
