Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-28-2016, 12:43 PM   #81
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Fighters don't have to be (and usually aren't) defencemen. That is all.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2016, 12:45 PM   #82
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckedoff View Post
Will LV be able to offer sheet McDavid during that window? Something like 12x12?
It wouldn't be an offersheet for RFAs, they would agree to a deal and essentially pick them in the expansion draft. But they can only negotiate with players that are not protected.
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2016, 12:49 PM   #83
SofaProfessor
Scoring Winger
 
SofaProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22 View Post
The thing that irks me most about the expansion draft is that we'll have to go through the same BS in a couple of years again. The league should have found a way to introduce two new teams at the same time and make everybody prepare for it by giving clear rules in advance. Instead, they'll have two expansion drafts in a short span and seemingly make up rules on the fly. Ridiculous.
This is the worst part. If they do introduce another expansion team and mess around with the rules from this upcoming expansion then you're opening up a whole wealth of reasons for everyone to be upset.

Existing teams will be angry because they keep having to stay on their toes with changing rules and rumours about changes.

Expansion teams may be upset because the other team got to expand under a different ruleset which may be seen as more advantageous than the rules they had to abide by.

Non-hockey fans just see a joke unfolding as the league rushes to be the first major sport in Vegas and that's not exactly a confidence building way to grow the game - which is the entire point of expansion.
__________________
SofaProfessor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2016, 01:22 PM   #84
PugnaciousIntern
First Line Centre
 
PugnaciousIntern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puckedoff View Post
Will LV be able to offer sheet McDavid during that window? Something like 12x12?
The way things are going, 12x12 seems like a completely plausible contract
PugnaciousIntern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2016, 01:39 PM   #85
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SofaProfessor View Post
Non-hockey fans just see a joke unfolding as the league rushes to be the first major sport in Vegas and that's not exactly a confidence building way to grow the game - which is the entire point of expansion.
Non-hockey fans are completely unaware of wrinkles in expansion rules and would be hard pressed to identify that the league is expanding, let alone that it is expanding to Las Vegas, let alone see that process as a joke.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Finger Cookin For This Useful Post:
Old 10-28-2016, 01:43 PM   #86
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

They're not really changing the rules, they're just clarifying specifics. This is no different than a team trading for a pending free agent and wanting to talk to the player before making the trade.

It's the same thing the Flames did when they acquired Wideman.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2016, 01:54 PM   #87
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
They're not really changing the rules, they're just clarifying specifics. This is no different than a team trading for a pending free agent and wanting to talk to the player before making the trade.

It's the same thing the Flames did when they acquired Wideman.
Ouch I forgot about that. We gave up an AHLer and a 5th round pick for the right to sign that bad contract.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2016, 02:05 PM   #88
SofaProfessor
Scoring Winger
 
SofaProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin View Post
Non-hockey fans are completely unaware of wrinkles in expansion rules and would be hard pressed to identify that the league is expanding, let alone that it is expanding to Las Vegas, let alone see that process as a joke.
They may not be aware right now. They definitely don't care right now. But when they do hear about expansion it will probably be a 30 second segment on a sports talk show mainly dedicated to NFL and NBA where Steven A. Smith is yelling at an unnecessarily loud level about how dumb the NHL is. That's what they will hear about it and that's how they will form their opinion.
__________________
SofaProfessor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2016, 02:07 PM   #89
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

So you could say they don't see a joke unfolding, then.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2016, 03:07 PM   #90
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

wait...

so Vegas gets an exclusive window on all UFAs? And have $0 on the salary cap?
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2016, 09:00 AM   #91
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Lebrun just clarified that Vegas can sign unprotected RFAs in this window, just as if they already owned their rights. He also clarified that a maximum of 10 of the 30 players can be free agent signings. That is, 20 of the 30 players must be drafted from the unprotected lists of the existing teams.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2016, 10:06 AM   #92
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Looks like there is some concern that teams will loophole this:

http://www.tsn.ca/concerns-about-nhl...merge-1.609388

Quote:
Pending free agents remain the biggest concern when it comes to expansion after the GMs meetings Tuesday.

The Las Vegas expansion team and some of the 30 existing teams are worried about less-than-honest agreements circumventing the expansion-draft rules.

What, GMs looking for loopholes? Come on.

Specifically, GMs worry that Vegas could take advantage of the 48-hour window before the expansion draft in June to quietly agree to terms on a deal with a pending unrestricted free agent, then wait until July 1 to sign him, so as to pluck another player off a team's roster in the expansion draft.

This would circumvent the rule that if a team loses a free agent to Vegas in that 48-hour free-agent-signing window, it cannot lose another player in the expansion draft. Some GMs worry that veteran GM George McPhee, who wasn't born yesterday, would take advantage of the situation.

Conversely?

"George has the same concerns about existing teams doing those types of deals with players they don't have to protect," deputy commissioner Bill Daly said Tuesday after the GMs meeting.

McPhee wisely worries that a team or two might do a "drawer deal'' with a pending UFA but not officially sign it until after the expansion draft. Why? Teams don't have to protect pending free agents because they aren't eligible for the expansion draft. Here's an example: If the San Jose Sharks didn't officially re-sign Joe Thornton until after the expansion draft, they could protect another player.

"There has to be a high level of diligence to make sure those things don't happen and to make sure people know there will be significant penalties imposed if they were to screw around with the rules,'' Daly said.

Daly said violators of the expansion rules forgo a first-round draft pick, so penalties in the same vein would be "appropriate."
New Jersey Devils GM Ray Shero insisted anyone would be crazy to attempt that type of circumvention.

"I certainly don't want to be involved in that because I certainly love my job and can't afford the fine," Shero said with a smile. "Sure, we talked about it today [in the GMs meeting]. Those are the what-ifs? But with anything, everything has to pass the smell test with the league. You got to have some big you-know-whats to screw around with that.''

Last edited by sureLoss; 11-16-2016 at 10:09 AM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy