Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-16-2016, 04:09 PM   #2641
Drak
First Line Centre
 
Drak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

The argument that women aren't filing lawsuits en masse due to wage inequality, therefore that proves there is no wage inequality, doesn't make sense.

1. It takes time to file a lawsuit
2. It creates conflict with the employer - you can probably kiss your job goodbye and join the unemployment line
3. It's expensive
4. Employers are protected against lawsuits
Drak is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Drak For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2016, 04:24 PM   #2642
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Obama's first law was the Lilley Ledbetter act, worth reading up on if you're curious.
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 04:34 PM   #2643
Drak
First Line Centre
 
Drak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gozer View Post
Obama's first law was the Lilley Ledbetter act, worth reading up on if you're curious.
Are you saying because it was passed everything was fine? Or are you just letting people know about it?
Drak is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 04:37 PM   #2644
DuffMan
Franchise Player
 
DuffMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
I don't think anyone in this thread believes that Hillary is a great choice for president. However, I don't believe it is debatable that she is a superior choice to Trump.
I do, not perfect, but besides OBAMA, I really can't think of anyone present, or past dozen years, I'd rather have.
__________________
Pass the bacon.
DuffMan is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 04:38 PM   #2645
Drak
First Line Centre
 
Drak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuffMan View Post
I do, not perfect, but besides OBAMA, I really can't think of anyone present, or past dozen years, I'd rather have.
I wouldn't mind Michelle Obama.
Drak is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 04:40 PM   #2646
DuffMan
Franchise Player
 
DuffMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drak View Post
I wouldn't mind Michelle Obama.
2020, do it.
Black president, woman president, black woman president.
__________________
Pass the bacon.
DuffMan is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 04:41 PM   #2647
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drak View Post
Are you saying because it was passed everything was fine? Or are you just letting people know about it?
Just an FYI; it's a narrowly focused law.
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 04:41 PM   #2648
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
OI think I'm probably being too hard on Photon, who might in retrospect have preferred if he'd worded his post differently. And he also pointed out that different people define the term in different ways. I'm just saying that opposition to free speech comes in much broader flavours than the government coming to arrest you. That's not really an issue in Canada or the USA (though HR tribunals always enter my mind when I say that).
Sorry I was away for a while, but I did pretty much mean it as I said it, in the same way that being anti-slavery is the only tolerable position.

I mean tolerable as in adequate or passable, not tolerable as in if it isn't tolerated it's forcibly suppressed by the government.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 04:44 PM   #2649
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuffMan View Post
2020, do it.
Black president, woman president, black woman president.
I adore FLOTUS but I would go ballistic if the US is ruled by 3 families for almost 50 years.
I would petition the UN to revoke their 'democracy' status, if that's a thing.
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 04:51 PM   #2650
ernie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drak View Post
The argument that women aren't filing lawsuits en masse due to wage inequality, therefore that proves there is no wage inequality, doesn't make sense.

1. It takes time to file a lawsuit
2. It creates conflict with the employer - you can probably kiss your job goodbye and join the unemployment line
3. It's expensive
4. Employers are protected against lawsuits
It also requires a single company to be doing the discriminatory act. An individual company may not be discriminatory but the market as a whole can be. It has been shown that end are hired preferentially even if through unconscious bias and as such on the whole women will be hired into the less preferred job (same with minorities). This does result in a wage gap. In addition, women are unproprortionately punished for parental leave or temporarily leaving the workforce. Yes that impacts future earnings and even when taken into account those family things it does not fully account for the wage disparity. Furthermore, women are often seen as less productive and in incentive based performance will receive less even if they did the same or more. It is very real.

Your list is also correct as to why things are often not pursued.

It is fair to say it has become more nuanced than the straight up systemic racism in law enforcement. And that it isn't nearly as bad as it was but there is still a discrepancy.

Last edited by ernie; 10-16-2016 at 04:53 PM.
ernie is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ernie For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2016, 04:55 PM   #2651
DuffMan
Franchise Player
 
DuffMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gozer View Post
I adore FLOTUS but I would go ballistic if the US is ruled by 3 families for almost 50 years.
I would petition the UN to revoke their 'democracy' status, if that's a thing.
Well, to be fair, HILLARY and Michelle both married into the families, not quite a bush scenario.
But I hear what you're saying.
__________________
Pass the bacon.
DuffMan is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 04:57 PM   #2652
corporatejay
Franchise Player
 
corporatejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

So let me get this straight. Kid at UofC gets strangled for wearing a hat that some people find offensive and the collective response is "meh".
__________________
corporatejay is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 05:00 PM   #2653
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay View Post
So let me get this straight. Kid at UofC gets strangled for wearing a hat that some people find offensive and the collective response is "meh".
This is the first time I've heard about it.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 05:01 PM   #2654
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuffMan View Post
I do, not perfect, but besides OBAMA, I really can't think of anyone present, or past dozen years, I'd rather have.
For me Biden or Warren would have been better than Hillary amount the viable candidates.
GGG is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 05:02 PM   #2655
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay View Post
So let me get this straight. Kid at UofC gets strangled for wearing a hat that some people find offensive and the collective response is "meh".
Are you talking about the Mount Royal trump hat shouting match or something different?
GGG is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 05:02 PM   #2656
Drak
First Line Centre
 
Drak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay View Post
So let me get this straight. Kid at UofC gets strangled for wearing a hat that some people find offensive and the collective response is "meh".
Outside of Reddit, I don't see this being reported in the news. If true, it's vile.
Drak is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 05:04 PM   #2657
DuffMan
Franchise Player
 
DuffMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
For me Biden or Warren would have been better than Hillary amount the viable candidates.
Sure, Biden would have been great, but he didn't run. Warren.....maybe, I kind of like her in other capacities, like what she is already doing. Not sure of the POTUS, the GOP obstruction might be too much for her.
__________________
Pass the bacon.
DuffMan is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 05:04 PM   #2658
Drak
First Line Centre
 
Drak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

Warren belongs in the senate where she can be most effective.
Drak is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Drak For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2016, 05:06 PM   #2659
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay View Post
So let me get this straight. Kid at UofC gets strangled for wearing a hat that some people find offensive and the collective response is "meh".
I actually have not seen anything about that other than a Facebook post. And let's face it, that is a poor/extremely unreliable news source.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline  
Old 10-16-2016, 05:11 PM   #2660
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

I think is about a kid getting heckled - was posted on CP - and it became an attack while echoing in 'the bubble.'
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
don't vote=don't complain , emails!!! (people cared) , murica , orange vs. blue , please no scott adams


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:36 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy