Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-13-2016, 12:04 AM   #161
united
#1 Goaltender
 
united's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Exp:
Default

Jakub Nakladal who played well in a depth role last season and wanted to stay in Calgary: $600,000.
Nicklas Grossman who has been a complete liability for years now: $575,000.

Just had to get more size and grit, right, Burke?
__________________
"I think the eye test is still good, but analytics can sure give you confirmation: what you see...is that what you really believe?"
Scotty Bowman, 0 NHL games played
united is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to united For This Useful Post:
Old 10-13-2016, 04:37 AM   #162
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

The fact that Grossmann was started instead of Kevin has given me a serious fear that we're going to stink up the league again.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to FlameZilla For This Useful Post:
Old 10-13-2016, 04:50 AM   #163
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

New whipping boy is born. Fire him into the sun already.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 05:30 AM   #164
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I thought that outside of the one pass that was intercepted that led to the goal against (which was a flukey re-direct), he was solid for most of his shifts. It wasn't his fault on the second goal, it was Tkachuk who failed to cover him as he was on an odd man rush.

I'm not a huge fan of playing 3 slow defensemen against a team that has a couple extremely fast players, but he wasn't as horrible as he's being made out to be. Elliott should have stopped a couple of the shots that went in (Goals 4, 6 specifically). If he makes those saves, which should have been stopped, the Flames get a point. He didn't, we didn't.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 10-13-2016, 06:19 AM   #165
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

I'm still a fan of Grossman, last night was bad but it wasn't all his fault. He did have a bad pass but just about everyone played bad last night, at least he did bring some physicality to the game (it was fun to see him push around Kassian a bit).

I do however think that he shouldn't have been in the game. I like Grossman as a depth guy but I think Kevin should have played last night instead.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-13-2016, 06:36 AM   #166
Rtown
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp:
Default

Anders Grossman
Jay Grossmeester
Gross Butler

Did I miss anyone?

Don't get me wrong, not really a fan either, just trying to roll the last 10 years of whipping boy D-men into 1 super whipping boy D-man
Rtown is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rtown For This Useful Post:
Old 10-13-2016, 06:45 AM   #167
Gaudreauvertime
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
I'm still a fan of Grossman, last night was bad but it wasn't all his fault. He did have a bad pass but just about everyone played bad last night, at least he did bring some physicality to the game (it was fun to see him push around Kassian a bit).

I do however think that he shouldn't have been in the game. I like Grossman as a depth guy but I think Kevin should have played last night instead.
Grossman certainly wasn't great in the first period, but he settled down and played pretty well through the rest of the game. I'd still prefer him over Wideman (especially on the PK, why was Wideman on the PK?) At the very least we won't get the refs all over us.

If he is going to play, it can't be with Hamilton.

You could try to keep the wealth spread out:

Giordano - Engelland
Grossman - Brodie
Kevin - Hamilton

Or put Brodano back together and play primarily with 4 D

Giordano - Brodie; 20-23 mins at ES
Kevin - Hamilton; 18-21 mins at ES
Kulak/Grossman - Engelland; 5-8 mins of ES and let them be 2nd PK unit.
Gaudreauvertime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 07:51 AM   #168
Cactus Jack
First Line Centre
 
Cactus Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Are Grossman´s two errors that led to goals better than any Kulak would potentially make? At least Kulak is young and can learn from the errors, besides the fact he contributes in other areas. Grossman contributes nothing, no exaggeration.

And the second goal was his fault. He has no business pinching, especially making a bad pinch the Oilers´AHL level D took right off him in a split second. He can´t do anything with the puck once he has it and is too slow to get back. Just horrible.
__________________
Resident beer snob
Cactus Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 08:00 AM   #169
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cactus Jack View Post
Are Grossman´s two errors that led to goals better than any Kulak would potentially make? At least Kulak is young and can learn from the errors, besides the fact he contributes in other areas. Grossman contributes nothing, no exaggeration.

And the second goal was his fault. He has no business pinching, especially making a bad pinch the Oilers´AHL level D took right off him in a split second. He can´t do anything with the puck once he has it and is too slow to get back. Just horrible.
The second goal wasn't his fault. If the Oilers back up to their net while he has the puck, he should challenge. The trouble was, Tkachuk didn't cover. It's an 18yo mistake. It happens.

Worse than the errors is the total inability to move the puck up ice with possession. We focus on defensive miscues, but that's not as big of a problem as being incapable of playing together with the other 4 players on the ice. If you can't get or hold on to the puck, it's all for naught.
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 09:04 AM   #170
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
The second goal wasn't his fault. If the Oilers back up to their net while he has the puck, he should challenge. The trouble was, Tkachuk didn't cover. It's an 18yo mistake. It happens.

Worse than the errors is the total inability to move the puck up ice with possession. We focus on defensive miscues, but that's not as big of a problem as being incapable of playing together with the other 4 players on the ice. If you can't get or hold on to the puck, it's all for naught.
Yes, Tkachuk should have covered.

But rarely are goals against the result of just one mistake - it usually takes more than one. And this time is no exception.

The moment Grossman went in deep and tried to make a move, you knew it was going to end badly. I don't mind him starting the play - there was an opening. But he should have moved the puck more quickly. That play was going to end in an odd man rush the other way every time.

Also, last season, when a defenseman pinched, all the forwards went with them. They attacked as a 4 (and sometime 5) man unit. And they continued to do it in pre-season. It is going to take a while to get them to stop.

Finally, Hamilton played the pass, leaving the shooter to Elliott (which is exactly what he should have done). Elliott has to make that save.

Three bad plays.

But the fact that Tkachuk and Elliott made bad plays, does not excuse Grossman from his.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 10-13-2016, 09:07 AM   #171
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Said it last night and I'll say it again here. Re: the 2nd goal. You're a big lumbering defenseman at the end of a penalty kill. You get out of the box and get the puck on your stick. Dump it in and get off.

Also, I would be much happier seeing young players like Kulak or Jokipakka making mistakes and learning in games like this rather than watching vets make poor plays where they should know better.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 09:08 AM   #172
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

You guys can thank Don Maloney for that signing. Grossman sucks
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 09:29 AM   #173
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Couldn't give Nakladal a contract Tre?

Again, absolutely awful at evaluating depth talent.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Old 10-13-2016, 09:30 AM   #174
Bandwagon In Flames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
Exp:
Default

Grossmann might not be as terrible as we're making him out to be.

But there's no way he should be ahead of Kulak or Jokipakka against any matchup. I'm not particularly high on Jokipakka, but I consider Kulak our 4th best defenseman right now.
Bandwagon In Flames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bandwagon In Flames For This Useful Post:
Old 10-13-2016, 09:55 AM   #175
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Couldn't give Nakladal a contract Tre?

Again, absolutely awful at evaluating depth talent.
Maybe Nakladal chose Carolina over us.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 10:05 AM   #176
MarkGio
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames View Post
Grossmann might not be as terrible as we're making him out to be.

But there's no way he should be ahead of Kulak or Jokipakka against any matchup. I'm not particularly high on Jokipakka, but I consider Kulak our 4th best defenseman right now.
Agreed. Last years performance for Wideman was an off-year. He's look like he's returned to form this year based on camp and last night. So I rank them as follows:

1) Gio
2) Brodie
3) Wideman
4) Hamilton
5) Kulak
6) Engelland
7) Jokipakka
8) Grossman

I can accept Grossman over Jokipakka based on things happening in the locker room or personalities or whatever, but I can't understand him overtaking Kulak due to those elements unless were trying to lose hockey games
MarkGio is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MarkGio For This Useful Post:
Old 10-13-2016, 10:07 AM   #177
lazypucker
First Line Centre
 
lazypucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
Maybe Nakladal chose Carolina over us.
I don't think so. I remember reading something during the World Cup about 2 weeks ago mentioning Nakladal is begging the Flames to sign him. Treliving only offered a 2-way contract, and he chose Carolina who offers a 1-way instead.

I am still not sure why Treliving chose Grossman over Nakladal over similar money
lazypucker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 10:09 AM   #178
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Surprised Grossman had enough negotiating leverage to command a one way.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2016, 10:22 AM   #179
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markgio View Post
agreed. Last years performance for wideman was an off-year. He's look like he's returned to form this year based on camp and last night. So i rank them as follows:

1) gio
2) brodie
3) wideman
4) hamilton
5) kulak
6) engelland
7) jokipakka

8)

9) grossman

i can accept grossman over jokipakka based on things happening in the locker room or personalities or whatever, but i can't understand him overtaking kulak due to those elements unless were trying to lose hockey games
fyp
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
Old 10-13-2016, 10:54 AM   #180
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

It's sad knowing that Treliving could've signed Nakladal for $100K more instead of Grossman.
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:31 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy