Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-05-2016, 02:37 PM   #1
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default Three Calgary police officers charged

Good to see some accountability from our police force.

http://calgary.ctvnews.ca/mobile/thr...tion-1.3103092



The 34-year-old man was arrested after a foot chase and taken to hospital to be treated for several broken ribs and a collapsed lung.
The incident between the suspect and the group of four police officers was captured on one of the dashboard cameras of the CPS cruisers.
An investigation was launched shortly after administrators saw the recorded video in August.

The CPS then passed the details onto the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team which conducted its own investigation.
Four officers were involved in the original investigation but only three face charges.

Constables James Othen and Kevin Humphrey each face one count of assault causing bodily harm and two counts of public mischief.
Othen is also facing a charge of assault with a weapon.
The third officer, Constable Michael Sandalack, has been charged with a single count of assault causing bodily harm.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2016, 02:59 PM   #2
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'm generally supportive of the police, and appreciate the work that they do. But I also found this incident to be excessive at first glance, and I am glad that they are being held accountable.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2016, 06:34 PM   #3
iggy_oi
Franchise Player
 
iggy_oi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Exp:
Default

See America, that wasn't very hard.
iggy_oi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2016, 08:01 PM   #4
Scoopdogg
Scoring Winger
 
Scoopdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ctown
Exp:
Default

I'm a friend of a friend for one of the officers arrested. He's a ######bag and I have no doubt he would do something like this.

Not the first time he's been on some sort of paid leave either. I hope he loses his job and never polices again


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Scoopdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 12:21 AM   #5
Swift
Not Taylor
 
Swift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Calgary SW
Exp:
Default

Presumably, that would be this guy? - http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...rges-1.3793362
Swift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 09:13 AM   #6
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

It's a shame a couple bad apples make all cops look bad now. But it really does make me wonder how much goes on behind the scenes that we don't know about. I agree with the article that fabricating lies and trying to press false charges on the suspect was the worst crime out of everything they did. I can only imagine how many times something like that may have happened here and it's the word of multiple cops vs one guy who is labelled a criminal. Scary stuff. I'm scared to think what would have happened if that dash cam wasn't running. Body cams can't get here soon enough.

I also heard on the radio that the 4th cop who was released and will be back on the job, that he possibly was the one who brought this all to the forefront. I was kind of half asleep when l heard it on the radio this morning. But the father of the guy who killed by police in the hotel room a while back was interviewed, and said that he's now worried that cop will be shunned by his police colleagues since he ''ratted out'' the 3 cops and that cops are supposed to have each others' backs and that his career might effectively be over now.

Just a disappointing story all around. Especially at a time when the city's faith in the CPS seems pretty low. I had one bad run in with a cop a couple years ago. But even after that incident I still supported our CPS members. Big shoutout to ASIRT for their work in this. I don't even want to think what be happening without them here to hold the CPS accountable.
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 09:20 AM   #7
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cameron Swift View Post
Presumably, that would be this guy? - http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...rges-1.3793362
That is simply disturbing. Stalking,, posting intimate pictures of his ex gf who is also a police offer to his social media accounts...this man has problems. And he wasn't even charged in that case.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 09:37 AM   #8
Mickey76
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

The problem to me is that it is more than a few bad apples. When all the supposed good apples won't stop, testify, or report the bad apples then in my mind we have more than a few bad apples.
Mickey76 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mickey76 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-06-2016, 09:42 AM   #9
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

There's an institutional group thought with cops and firefighters and others that they take care of their own. They won't turn them in or testify against them when they can because it means that their work environment becomes hostile and they're looked at as snitches.

That has to change, at some point the police need to police the police.

I also think that there needs to be way more stringent regular testing both in terms of procedures and in terms of mental health because frankly that job will break a lot of people.

I read a story where one cop was being investigated for corruption here in Calgary, and just before the internal inquiry he decided to retire and take his pension and run so the inquiry was canceled. Personally I think that's garbage.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 09:46 AM   #10
Red
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Doesn't look good on the new Police Chief at all. Was there a change of direction from when Hanson retired?
Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 09:50 AM   #11
Frank MetaMusil
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
 
Frank MetaMusil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red View Post
Doesn't look good on the new Police Chief at all. Was there a change of direction from when Hanson retired?
Hanson was just better at covering things up, like the speeding tickets he never paid.
Frank MetaMusil is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank MetaMusil For This Useful Post:
Old 10-06-2016, 09:53 AM   #12
Red
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank MetaMusil View Post
Hanson was just better at covering things up, like the speeding tickets he never paid.
Really? Never heard that but that's funny none the less. I know a cop and his wife got off a ticket by just mentioning she was a cop wife...Not surprised though,
Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 10:07 AM   #13
AcGold
Self-Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

It's good to see the checks and balances actually work. I'm starting to think a lot of the media reports are skewing a minor issue to look much worse than it is.
AcGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 10:16 AM   #14
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Cases like this are exactly why the scrutiny of police does not equate to being anti-police. Quite often, whenever police are criticized, there is a knee-jerk reaction that scrutinizing means that you dislike the police. That couldn't be further from the truth. They have a high standard, which most of them have no problem staying above. As for the bad apples - they can have their day in court.

I also welcome the increase of video evidence, whether it be from witnesses, dash cams, body cams, etc. The good cops should welcome these measures as it will only prove that their actions are lawful. And, as in the case, they can provide great evidence to weed out the bad ones.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jimmy Stang For This Useful Post:
Old 10-06-2016, 10:35 AM   #15
Crumpy-Gunt
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: 403
Exp:
Default

I've always been annoyed by the bad apples analogy. I think its a systematic problem. Most officers are not bad people. The problem for me is they can do something illegal and get away with it because of their job or connections. It isnt just cops but a lot of jobs allow a long leash for people and kind of assume the person will be virtuous and honest. There is this unwritten rule of cops covering each others asses no matter what. I dont think anything happens about this if there is no dash cam. No cop comes forward and the victim's complaint will be outweighed by the corroborating reports of 3 respected officers. The sad bit is that 4 cops were involved and present...3 are charged - and it wasn't the 4th cop that said anything or reported his 3 co-workers. That speaks volumes.

The way I see it; its police/military culture. Globally. They can get away with a lot and they know it. Nobody rats anybody out for crossing a line or breaking a law.

Some of the nicest and best people I've known have been cops. Its sad to see peoples view of cops nowadays but there is a reason for it.

I think cops should wear body cams that they cant or are not allowed to turn off. It would be great for a number of reasons. A lot of stores/banks have cameras specifically to watch their employees and they are unarmed people only dealing with money.

There is no way these cops would have #### kicked this dude if they all had body cameras on. I hope they go to jail like any other 3 citizens would if they broke someones ribs and collapsed their lung! Two of these officers were on the force for 9 years each! Are we to assume that its the first time theyve ever done something like that?

Last edited by Crumpy-Gunt; 10-06-2016 at 10:42 AM.
Crumpy-Gunt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Crumpy-Gunt For This Useful Post:
Old 10-06-2016, 10:45 AM   #16
worth
Franchise Player
 
worth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

They will be able to turn the body cameras off once they are deployed:

Quote:
Why are the cameras not recording all the time?
We have a duty to ensure the privacy rights of the public are considered at all times and therefore require the ability to turn off the cameras in sensitive situations. Cameras that can never be turned off would not allow police officers the ability to balance the privacy rights of individuals with the benefits of collecting evidence for law enforcement purposes.

We also have to be mindful of the privacy rights for members wearing the cameras. For example, officers must still be able to take washroom and lunch breaks, have a private conversation, or discuss confidential police tactics without being recorded. One of the main goals of the cameras are to assist the officers in collecting the best evidence possible during an investigative contact. Recording activities that are not required for a law enforcement purpose does not fit within the mandate of the program, or the Service’s expectations as described in the Privacy Impact Assessment.

As well as privacy concerns, the current technology (the life of the battery and the costs associated to data storage) currently prohibit the possibility of recording a full 12 hour shift.
https://www.calgary.ca/cps/Pages/Body-Worn-Camera.aspx
worth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 10:57 AM   #17
Crumpy-Gunt
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: 403
Exp:
Default

I get the part about them being able to take a poop and have a private discussion or lunch without being on camera...but if these people are allowed to be in the middle of a call or responding to something / apprehending someone - they shouldnt be able to turn it off at all. Can you imagine a group of cops chasing someone down for fleeing and then catching them in an alley - only to turn their bodycam off just before they get their hands on the person. Seriously what is the point of a bodycam you can turn off when you choose to. Why do they list collecting evidence for law enforcement purposes as the only reason for the bodycam? What about public safety, reviewing conduct, monitoring new officers, accountability, transparency, officer safety etc.
Crumpy-Gunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 11:06 AM   #18
OMG!WTF!
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
I hope they go to jail like any other 3 citizens would if they broke someones ribs and collapsed their lung!
I actually hope they get a harder penalty if convicted. In the same way there are stiffer penalties for crimes against cops there should be similar consequences vice versa. It is actually a worse crime for a cop to do this than a regular citizen. The trust required by citizens for policing to work is more important to protect.
OMG!WTF! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 11:44 AM   #19
Frank MetaMusil
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
 
Frank MetaMusil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpy-Gunt View Post
I get the part about them being able to take a poop and have a private discussion or lunch without being on camera...but if these people are allowed to be in the middle of a call or responding to something / apprehending someone - they shouldnt be able to turn it off at all. Can you imagine a group of cops chasing someone down for fleeing and then catching them in an alley - only to turn their bodycam off just before they get their hands on the person. Seriously what is the point of a bodycam you can turn off when you choose to. Why do they list collecting evidence for law enforcement purposes as the only reason for the bodycam? What about public safety, reviewing conduct, monitoring new officers, accountability, transparency, officer safety etc.
The best line in that article is "confidential police tactics" WTF does that even mean? Aren't people allowed to take ride-alongs with the police?
Frank MetaMusil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2016, 01:46 PM   #20
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpy-Gunt View Post
The sad bit is that 4 cops were involved and present...3 are charged - and it wasn't the 4th cop that said anything or reported his 3 co-workers. That speaks volumes.
As I said in my post earlier, I swear I heard an interview on the radio this morning that said differently. That cop #4's career was at risk because he was the one who went against the ''brotherhood'' mentality and he could expect his colleagues to turn their backs on him now that he 'snitched' on them.

I very well might have misheard it. I'm just wondering where you heard this?
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:40 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy