Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-06-2016, 08:31 PM   #1
Flamescuprun2018
Scoring Winger
 
Flamescuprun2018's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default Smaller goalie equipment vs bigger nets

Have been hearing that the process for moving toward smaller goalie equipment is taking a lot longer to sort through than planned.

Significant push back and major worries from some goalies that proposed changes are not safe with real risk of getting a puck in an unprotected area.

The transition will be slow with lots of opposition. Looks like 2017-18 before we see the equipment changes in the NHL.

NHL Network was discussing today that the year Gretzky scored 92 goals there was about 20% of the net visible on a shot if you look at all angles. Now that percent is probably half that with the larger goalie equipment.

The solution that would be quick to implement would simply be to increase the goal size slightly.

I wonder why they went with goalie equipment and risk injury when a slight increase in goal size would be free of injury risk and achieve the desired goal of a bit more scoring?

Those 2 or 3 goal post twangs we hear every game would translate to goals!

Would be interesting to calculate the proportion of visible net for every inch added to width and height of goal area?
Flamescuprun2018 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2016, 08:36 PM   #2
Redrum
First Line Centre
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Maybe increase the size a little bit but I think bigger nets would take away from smaller more talented goalies and encourage more big blocking thugs. Maybe that's just me.
Redrum is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2016, 09:12 PM   #3
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Smaller gear. Leave the nets. They'll figure out a way. There's no reason the pads can't be thinner and more contoured, protecting the player while not creating shot blockers that aren't actually protecting anything. Layered, like a suit of armor
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Coach For This Useful Post:
Old 09-06-2016, 09:31 PM   #4
Flamescuprun2018
Scoring Winger
 
Flamescuprun2018's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Some links to the subject:
http://www.thehockeynews.com/blog/is...ill-thinks-so/

https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nh...223717108.html

Excerpt from Yahoo Sports favoring goalie equipment change:

"If you shrink the size of goalie equipment in the NHL, other levels of hockey aren’t all that affected. If you change the size of the goal cage, you basically have to make sure that every other level of competitive hockey in North America is down with that idea, too. There’s no sense in having a player demoted to the AHL firing on a differently-sized net.

There’s even a construction consideration, too. Creating a wider net means putting new holes in arena cement. Campbell said you’d need to x-ray the floor of arenas to make sure it doesn’t puncture a pipe or something.

But the biggest consideration for the NHL in making the nets bigger?

What if it doesn’t increase goal scoring?

It’s easy to do. You can’t tell the nets are bigger. But it’s not that easy to do because you gotta make the decision that this is going to work, and satisfy your goal scoring problems."
Flamescuprun2018 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flamescuprun2018 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-06-2016, 09:42 PM   #5
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

If they ever made the nets bigger I would seriously consider never watching another hockey game again.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to calgaryblood For This Useful Post:
Old 09-06-2016, 10:04 PM   #6
FireGilbert
Franchise Player
 
FireGilbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
Exp:
Default

Just shrink the equipment already. The worst culprit is the gloves. They used to be similar to a catchers mitt with a bit of additional padding on the wrist. Now they are basically a blocker with a massive glove on the end that could catch a beach ball. Shrink them so the hand is still protected but the glove part is only big enough to catch a puck.



FireGilbert is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FireGilbert For This Useful Post:
Old 09-06-2016, 10:27 PM   #7
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

The worst culprit is not just the gloves. All of the equipment is embarrassingly huge. Guys look like Optimus Prime when they're wearing their equipment.
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 4X4 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-06-2016, 10:29 PM   #8
Apollo
Farm Team Player
 
Apollo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

No, just no to changing the goal size. It would seriously damage the game and is totally pointless because the NHL already knows the problem is with pad size. Changing the net size would completely alter the dynamics of the ice and would require every level of hockey to make the same changes. Not to mention the impact on tracking stats and the impact on history. If changing pad sizes takes longer than expected, so be it. It's the right way to fix the problem. Changing the net size Is just a bad idea.
Apollo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 12:25 AM   #9
Philly06Cup
Closet Jedi
 
Philly06Cup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

History is already altered by equipment enhancements and other rules changes. That's a poor excuse.

Fact is people inherently resist change. Increasing nets is a viable solution, yet so many act as though its a non starter.

Sadly nhl knows its fans are stubborn cods and wants to cater to them and also resists creating too much change.
__________________
Gaudreau > Huberdeau AINEC
Philly06Cup is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Philly06Cup For This Useful Post:
Old 09-07-2016, 12:58 AM   #10
Tomas
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Exp:
Default

Look at this great video. The huge size of the golie equipment today has nothing to do with safety as you will see in the video. Shrink the pads, just get it done!

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/h...e-equipment-2/

Last edited by Tomas; 09-07-2016 at 01:07 AM.
Tomas is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tomas For This Useful Post:
Old 09-07-2016, 01:07 AM   #11
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philly06Cup View Post
History is already altered by equipment enhancements and other rules changes. That's a poor excuse.

Fact is people inherently resist change. Increasing nets is a viable solution, yet so many act as though its a non starter.

Sadly nhl knows its fans are stubborn cods and wants to cater to them and also resists creating too much change.
Changing the nets changes the angles. Angles the goalies use to stay square to the shooter. Angles they have been training to know for years. Changing the nets will leave a whole generation of goaltenders quite inept IMO.

Changing the gear doesn't change their positioning. Guaranteed goalies will want smaller gear before changing the nets.

When was the last time any major sport altered the dimensions of their goal?
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 07:33 AM   #12
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Increase the size of the nets. The fans complaining out bigger nets probably wouldn't even notice the difference if they weren't told in advance.
__________________

Fire is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 07:35 AM   #13
MarkGio
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
Changing the nets changes the angles. Angles the goalies use to stay square to the shooter. Angles they have been training to know for years. Changing the nets will leave a whole generation of goaltenders quite inept IMO.

Changing the gear doesn't change their positioning. Guaranteed goalies will want smaller gear before changing the nets.

When was the last time any major sport altered the dimensions of their goal?
Hockey did not too long ago when they made them narrow so there was more space behind the net. I believe that was 2008-09?
MarkGio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 07:41 AM   #14
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

It is not a big deal to make the adjustment. Seriously, when you're on the ice, it's a matter of moving maybe 2-3 inches to cut the angle or go slightly further out to cut the angle. It won't take more than a month for the NHL guys to adapt.

The real problem is the chest protectors and the goalie pants. I own a pair of each and they are ridiculously big and they are the correct size for me. You don't feel a damn thing other than you've been hit by the puck.

Have the padding on the chest being tight, no more than 1-2 inches away from the body total. Not the huge width they are now. Luongo is a skinny guy and yet he looks like what you would imagine strapping goalie pads on McGrattan would be like. Just doesn't make sense.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca

Last edited by Caged Great; 09-07-2016 at 07:45 AM.
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 09-07-2016, 07:41 AM   #15
gilligans_off
Powerplay Quarterback
 
gilligans_off's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Exp:
Default

Put me in the equipment boat. No need for the gear to be that large. It's gotten out of control.
gilligans_off is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 07:44 AM   #16
MarkGio
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

I support increasing the net size too. People who think it will lead to bigger goalies needs to look to basketball. Players are capped at a given size and the tallest men in the game are not the most tactile and athletic, barring a few exceptions. You're centres aren't usually you're best ball handlers, 3pt shooters and passers. They're usually good for posting up, defending and close range shooting. The centres who shoot 3's aren't 7'2", they're usually 6'10". Humans are capped as to how tall they can be.

Besides, the butterfly style caused taller goalies. The distance from the knees to shoulders determined how much space the players had above the shoulders and below the crossbar. The leg and arm span determined how much space a shooter had when a goalie shifted from one post to the other. All of which is determined by height.
MarkGio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 07:45 AM   #17
Looch City
Looooooooooooooch
 
Looch City's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Increasing net size would just push the development of even larger equipment.

The equipment needs to be smaller.
Looch City is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Looch City For This Useful Post:
Old 09-07-2016, 08:08 AM   #18
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I say no to bigger nets. With nets, the most I would do is make the posts and crossbar narrower to increase the inside diameter slightly.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 08:10 AM   #19
psyang
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

I agree the change should be in the equipment, not the net, but if they wanted to increase net size without changes to infrastructure, what if they said posts/crossbars are goals? Jokinen could have a resurgence!
psyang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 08:17 AM   #20
Flashpoint
Not the 1 millionth post winnar
 
Flashpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Exp:
Default

Goalie equipment should be for protection. Return it to that state and the problem is solved. If you are a goalie shouldn't it be about your athleticism and skill rather than your gear?
__________________
"Isles give up 3 picks for 5.5 mil of cap space.

Oilers give up a pick and a player to take on 5.5 mil."
-Bax
Flashpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:46 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy