Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-19-2016, 03:21 PM   #341
Niemo
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Niemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Johnny's deal will either be 6 or 8 years.

8 years for 6.75M
or
6 years for 6.375M
Niemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 03:21 PM   #342
Gaudreauvertime
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
The playoff year, Gio was the best player and there was nothing wrong with that. He was a friggen beast, and the clear cut favorite for the Norris.

Remember the last time the Flames won a Cup who the Conn Smythe winner was?
When he went down with an injury, the team didn't miss a beat. The Gio contract should certainly not be used as a measuring post, especially given his age.
Gaudreauvertime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 03:29 PM   #343
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
The playoff year, Gio was the best player and there was nothing wrong with that. He was a friggen beast, and the clear cut favorite for the Norris.

Remember the last time the Flames won a Cup who the Conn Smythe winner was?
I agree - Gio was awesome for 60+ games that year. And he is an excellent player. But are you suggesting he won the Conn Smythe back in 1989?
Strange Brew is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 04:07 PM   #344
sun
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Not cheering for losses
Exp:
Default

If Gaudreau stays at the Gio cap, then I'm thinking max term will be six years - expires at the same time as Gio's and then he'll get paid $$$, hopefully by us.

I think the Gio cap is kinda dumb tbh.
sun is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sun For This Useful Post:
Old 08-19-2016, 04:30 PM   #345
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sun View Post
If Gaudreau stays at the Gio cap, then I'm thinking max term will be six years - expires at the same time as Gio's and then he'll get paid $$$, hopefully by us.

I think the Gio cap is kinda dumb tbh.
Hopefully the Gio cap is not a real thing. It makes no sense as it hurts the team's chances of signing other good players, all for no real benefit. Honestly, it's the kind of crap I would expect from the Oilers. Hopefully Flames management is smarter than that.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fire of the Phoenix For This Useful Post:
Old 08-19-2016, 05:42 PM   #346
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

It seemed to work just fine for Lidstrom and the Red Wings...
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 05:56 PM   #347
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8 View Post
It seemed to work just fine for Lidstrom and the Red Wings...
Lidstrom made 7.8m (or whatever) while the cap was 39m-50m, and he was a top 5 defenseman of all time. I don't think that is a good comparable. Especially considering he anchored Red Wings teams that were basically a dynasty. Current Flames management hasn't had a sniff of success really, they are putting the cart before the horse. Institute a Gaudreau cap once he wins some Harts and the team wins some cups. Other than that, stop doing things that make your job harder for no good reason (if they even are, it's all speculation). I would be insulted if I was Gaudreau and the Flames were offering me 6-8 x $6.74m just to adhere to some random thing they decided to do. If that's going on, it's no surprise at all he hasn't signed.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 06:07 PM   #348
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Yeah I posted something similar in a different thread but is the Giordano cap real? I think the Iginla one was and Sutter would reference it before but I feel like the Giordano cap is a myth.

I think Johnny's deal will make him the highest played Flame regardless of the term.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 06:15 PM   #349
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick View Post
Yeah I posted something similar in a different thread but is the Giordano cap real? I think the Iginla one was and Sutter would reference it before but I feel like the Giordano cap is a myth.

I think Johnny's deal will make him the highest played Flame regardless of the term.
I think people think it is because the first year of Brodie's contract was structured to be slightly less than Gio's last year of his old deal, and I believe it was talked about by by Burke or Treliving. I'm thinking a lot of that has to do with the fact that Gio is the captain, they play the same position, are on a pairing and Gio WAS better at the time of the deal. I'm not sure that applies to this situation, but people may be assuming due to the Brodie thing.

Gaudreau is a whole other ball of wax though, and the Flames know it. There's just no way they can keep JG's cap hit $0.75m less than Tarasenko's, not unless they are willing to accept 4/5 year deal. Just my opinion obviously.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 06:27 PM   #350
sun
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Not cheering for losses
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8 View Post
It seemed to work just fine for Lidstrom and the Red Wings...
Lidstrom was making more money and is one of the top 10 best players to ever play. Not really comparable.
sun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 06:33 PM   #351
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Johnny Gaudreau is probably the Flames' best player already, so it doesn't make sense that he would make less money than Giordano just because he is younger. I want the best deal possible for the Flames but let's be honest, Johnny's worth at least as much as Tarasenko.

Last edited by Geeoff; 08-19-2016 at 06:38 PM.
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 07:29 PM   #352
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

So far Giordano has been compared favorably to Macinnis and Lidstrom.

Why not go full Bobby Orr?
Strange Brew is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
Old 08-19-2016, 09:45 PM   #353
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default Flames stars Sean Monahan and Johnny Gaudreau stick together

I personally think the Gio cap is real, and I also like it as a concept. When Gio was extended Treliving talked about how important it is to set an "internal salary structure" and I believe made reference directly to this.
heep223 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 09:55 PM   #354
taco.vidal
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223 View Post
I personally think the Gio cap is real, and I also like it as a concept. When Gio was extended Treliving talked about how important it is to set an "internal salary structure" and I believe made reference directly to this.
Circumstances change and good management and executive realize that and adjust. Gaudreau has changed the circumstances this team if facing. If Treliving doesnt recognize that or is too stubborn to move on the Gio cap if it does exist, then this team may be in trouble With Johnny.
taco.vidal is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to taco.vidal For This Useful Post:
Old 08-19-2016, 09:56 PM   #355
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Yeah they very well might have to break it but I still like the concept. Gio is a warrior and it's his team. That's how you create culture
heep223 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2016, 09:57 PM   #356
drewtastic
First Line Centre
 
drewtastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: So Long, Bannatyne
Exp:
Default

Every time I see this thread bumped, all I can think is: "Sticking together's what good waffles do."
drewtastic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to drewtastic For This Useful Post:
Old 08-19-2016, 10:27 PM   #357
Hackey
Franchise Player
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

I don't believe for a second that the Flames have some unwritten rule that no one makes more than Gio. They may be offering Gio money because of the term he is willing to sign or perhaps because they want a lower cap hit so they have more wiggle room over the next 5-6 years. Highly doubt the team refuses to pay Gaudreau more than 6.75 just because of Gio.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hackey For This Useful Post:
Old 08-20-2016, 02:26 AM   #358
skudr248
First Line Centre
 
skudr248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Winchestertonfieldville Jail
Exp:
Default

If this imaginary Gio cap is real, that is ####ing awesome! Speaks volumes to what kind of group we have running this organization. If we get Gaudreau under Gio money, Tree bird deserves a nice steak dinner
skudr248 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2016, 07:23 AM   #359
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skudr248 View Post
If this imaginary Gio cap is real, that is ####ing awesome! Speaks volumes to what kind of group we have running this organization. If we get Gaudreau under Gio money, Tree bird deserves a nice steak dinner
What kind of group would restrict itself to bringing in/retaining players that make $6.75m or less? That doesn't sound like a particular good strategy if your goal is to field the best team possible on a yearly basis. Does that mean they would've let Monahan go if he signed a $6.8m offersheet?
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2016, 08:06 AM   #360
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire of the Phoenix View Post
What kind of group would restrict itself to bringing in/retaining players that make $6.75m or less? That doesn't sound like a particular good strategy if your goal is to field the best team possible on a yearly basis. Does that mean they would've let Monahan go if he signed a $6.8m offersheet?

Obviously not. I think it's something they are trying use as a framework to make decisions, not some hard and fast rule that they live and die by.

Someone should ask them directly at a season ticket holder session.
heep223 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:53 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy