Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-18-2016, 12:08 AM   #1
3rd line Grinder
Crash and Bang Winger
 
3rd line Grinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Antigonish, NS
Exp:
Default Who is More Likely to Make the Team Opening Day?

Was talking about this with my buddy the other day and I feel like this is a valid point of discussion and thought I would share it and we could pass this summer discussing it.

Who is more likely to make the opening day roster? Mark Jankowski or Matthew Tkachuk?

I personally think Jankowski is more physically developed and better skill level at the moment, but Tkachuk fills a positional need better.

Last edited by 3rd line Grinder; 07-18-2016 at 01:00 AM. Reason: I dont know how to make a poll, but if any MODS see this and could create one for this thread it would be greatly appreciated
3rd line Grinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 12:13 AM   #2
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Tkachuk, rather easily. I don't think Janko will start in the NHL, I think he'll first be called up in January.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 12:26 AM   #3
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

I think will make the team.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to calgaryblood For This Useful Post:
Old 07-18-2016, 12:34 AM   #4
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Tkachuk just because it's either NHL or OHL for him, so once he's sent down, he's down for the whole season. Jankowski can be sent to the AHL initially and called up as needed.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 07-18-2016, 12:36 AM   #5
chockfullofgoodness
First Line Centre
 
chockfullofgoodness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
I think will make the team.
Well said.
chockfullofgoodness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 12:57 AM   #6
Wolfman
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chockfullofgoodness View Post
Well said.
Read the thread title carefully. Lol
__________________
Wolfman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 01:00 AM   #7
3rd line Grinder
Crash and Bang Winger
 
3rd line Grinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Antigonish, NS
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman View Post
Read the thread title carefully. Lol
well thats awkward....ninja edit!
3rd line Grinder is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 3rd line Grinder For This Useful Post:
Old 07-18-2016, 01:18 AM   #8
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Jankowski by a hair.

I think they both make it.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 07-18-2016, 01:40 AM   #9
Monahan For Mayor
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Exp:
Default

Tkachuk. Jankowski has to beat out Backlund or Bennett at centre. No point playing him 4th line minutes. If the plan is to convert him to wing could be pretty even.
Monahan For Mayor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 01:49 AM   #10
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

The threads spawned by this offseason include many that range from desperate to terrible.
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 01:54 AM   #11
chockfullofgoodness
First Line Centre
 
chockfullofgoodness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman View Post
Read the thread title carefully. Lol
I think I missed the joke. Not the first time!
chockfullofgoodness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 02:24 AM   #12
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chockfullofgoodness View Post
I think I missed the joke. Not the first time!
The title has been edited. It was originally missing a word.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 02:27 AM   #13
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Danny Pribyl.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 03:55 AM   #14
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Please make a feasible argument of why you think Jankowski will supplant one of Backlund, Bennett or Stajan out of camp. Further, please make a feasible argument as to why you think management would think it's a better idea for him to play a season in the NHL as opposed to the AHL for his first year of pro hockey.
Tinordi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 05:27 AM   #15
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
Please make a feasible argument of why you think Jankowski will supplant one of Backlund, Bennett or Stajan out of camp. Further, please make a feasible argument as to why you think management would think it's a better idea for him to play a season in the NHL as opposed to the AHL for his first year of pro hockey.
There are at least 2 feasible scenarios where Jankowski could make the team:

1) If Jankowski outplays Stajan he could supplant him on the centre depth list. Stajan either sits in the press box, converts to wing, goes to Stockton or is traded for peanuts. Jankowski begins his Flames career as 4th line C, gradually earning more responsibilities as he learns the system. (Most likely, but possibly least beneficial to Jankowski's development)

2) Jankowski outplays one of Tkachuk, Shinkaruk, Klimchuk (the 3 Uks), Poirier, Mangiapane or Chiasson and lands a spot as a middle 6 winger. Arguably the safest way for him to transition to the NHL, in a sheltered role with veteran presence on his line. (Good for his development, but less likely to outplay natural wingers)

3) Monahan negotiations drag on into the regular season and he sits out the first few games. (Least likely because Mony should sign)

Now that Colborne is gone it's slightly more likely that Jankowski makes the team than before. He would have to play the best hockey of his life in training camp, but if the new coaching staff think he's a better option for the team then he'll be there. There's no questioning this kid's work ethic and attitude. He could be indispensable in the near future. However, I think it's best for his development if he at least starts the season in the AHL.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 06:55 AM   #16
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Even if Tkachuck makes opening day roster he could get sent down before the 9 game mark.

Tkachuk will get at least a few NHL games in whereas Janko will start in the AHL.
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 07:41 AM   #17
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Tkachuk easily. Janko will likey get some games this year but I think he starts out in the AHL.
Vinny01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 07:59 AM   #18
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

In my view, Jankowski will start the season in AHL.

Tkachuk will also be cut and he will start the season in OHL.

Neither player will be on the opening day lineup.

Jankowski will be recalled couple months into the season....

Edit, my answer is neither
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post:
Old 07-18-2016, 08:08 AM   #19
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
Please make a feasible argument of why you think Jankowski will supplant one of Backlund, Bennett or Stajan out of camp. Further, please make a feasible argument as to why you think management would think it's a better idea for him to play a season in the NHL as opposed to the AHL for his first year of pro hockey.
A) Jankowski could start on the wing or Stajan can be moved over.
B) It's a better idea if he has a fantastic training camp and shows he's ready. Earning a spot in camp doesn't mean you're up all season, nor does getting sent down mean you're down all year.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2016, 08:24 AM   #20
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Tkachuk because of the OHL factor, and because there are more spots up for grabs on the wing.

The only way I see Jankowski on the opening day roster is due to an injury down the middle.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy