Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2016, 08:37 AM   #301
CMPunk
aka Spike
 
CMPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Darkest Corners of My Mind
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmac98 View Post
Asking for our 6th overall for Fleury seems stupid to me.
Can't get it if you don't ask.
CMPunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 08:37 AM   #302
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default Dreger: Bishop a target. McKenzie: Flames may have permission to talk to Bishop?

Honestly? I think the fact that Elliott looks like an old man scares people off. At least that's my only possible guess as to why he's questioned so much.

He's only 1.5 years older than Bishop. I go with the guy that has a lower acquisition cost, easy.

EDIT: and he's younger than Fleury

EDIT EDIT: dang, now all I want is Elliott
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 08:40 AM   #303
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Elliot is one I haven't given much thought too, and I don't know why, I'm pretty big on him. Would be cheaper to get than Bishop, probably Fluery too, and I'd say he's much better than the latter, and closer to Bishop than a lot would admit
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 08:40 AM   #304
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Honestly? I think the fact that Elliott looks like an old man scares people off. At least that's my only possible guess as to why he's questioned so much.

He's only 1.5 years older than Bishop. I go with the guy that has a lower acquisition cost, easy.

EDIT: and he's younger than Fleury

EDIT EDIT: dang, now all I want is Elliott

If the flames did go the Elliot route, I wonder if they would go after Reimer also ? I can't see flames going with Elliot and Ortio.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 08:41 AM   #305
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
EDIT: and he's younger than Fleury

EDIT EDIT: dang, now all I want is Elliott
I hear you, I've flip flopped on the goalie situation so many times, at this point I'd be happy with any one of the rumoured names out there
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 08:41 AM   #306
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
If the flames did go the Elliot route, I wonder if they would go after Reimer also ? I can't see flames going with Elliot and Ortio.
Why do you see Elliot / Ortio less likely than BLANK / Ortio combo for the Flames?
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 08:44 AM   #307
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle View Post
Why do you see Elliot / Ortio less likely than BLANK / Ortio combo for the Flames?


I would have to assume it's because Elliot has only ever started over 50 games in a season once in his career. He's always been a guy that splits the games and never a bona fide starter.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 08:44 AM   #308
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle View Post
Why do you see Elliot / Ortio less likely than BLANK / Ortio combo for the Flames?

Because Elliot has only played more than 50 games in a season once and that was 6-7 years ago. The other goalies mentioned like Bishop and Fleury play around the 60 game mark.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 08:45 AM   #309
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

One thing I don't think gets mentioned enough is contracts too. Both are UFA's next summer, but what's Bishop likely to get? Like, 7 mil? Worth it sure but yikes, that's a lot. Like others have mentioned though, can Elliot be THE guy? He seems to split duties, likely a reason for that. Can Ortio take up the other side sufficiently? Or even Ramo once healed?
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 08:45 AM   #310
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

I think another thing that gives hesitation about Elliott is that STL has seemed desperate to give the starting job to Allen. On the huge plus side, Elliott consistently plays well enough to make that impossible.

I think Ortio would be a fine backup on a 1-2 year deal. No need to sign Reimer as well.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 08:48 AM   #311
jmac98
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CMPunk View Post
Can't get it if you don't ask.
The topic was how there's no point in posturing because all the GM's are smart and acutely aware of the supply/demand scenario realizing it's a buyers market. Seems wanting 6th overall doesn't fit the intelligence mould here. That's all I was getting at.
jmac98 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jmac98 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 08:50 AM   #312
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Yes, because Tampa Bay is so loosey goosey in their defensive play as well. You know, they both gave up 201 goals against this past season. Pretty comparable.

Here's some interesting stats for you. In Bishop's four years in Tampa, 195 games played, he's had a .922 S% and a 2.24 GAA. In Elliott's five years in St. Louis, 180 games played, he's had a .925 S% and a 2.01 GAA.

Again, Elliott is terribly under-rated here.
Look at his numbers up until the moment he joined STL. They're Hilleresque.

And as pointed out by other posters he only played more than 50 games once. Less games and more rest and I'm not surprised his stats are a bit better. But I think we want a guy that's proven to be able to handle the majority of starts and maintain the numbers.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 08:50 AM   #313
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Man people are really sour on Ortio. He had a decent season once Bob was basically forced to play him. I'd have no problem with him playing 20-30 games.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Coach For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 08:53 AM   #314
skudr248
First Line Centre
 
skudr248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Winchestertonfieldville Jail
Exp:
Default

At this point lets just throw in Gillies in net and see what happens next year lol
skudr248 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 08:58 AM   #315
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
Look at his numbers up until the moment he joined STL. They're Hilleresque.

And as pointed out by other posters he only played more than 50 games once. Less games and more rest and I'm not surprised his stats are a bit better. But I think we want a guy that's proven to be able to handle the majority of starts and maintain the numbers.
Look at his age as well. Frankly, I don't give a damn what he did prior to the NHL. What has he done in the past three or four years. That is all that matters, and he's been great. And who gives a rip about if he has played a max of 50 games? That was a team decision. I'm sure we can play him more if we need to. But we are also going to finding a capable backup. It's not like he should have to play that many games if Treliving does his job.

Given the choice of Ben Bishop at $7M or Brian Elliott at $3M, I'll take Elliott and use that extra $4M to shore up our forwards and defense.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2016, 08:59 AM   #316
jmac98
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

Andersen and Reimer both play half seasons as well. It's not that uncommon if a tandem is your structure.
jmac98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:03 AM   #317
FBI
Franchise Player
 
FBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
Exp:
Default

Where is Elliot on bingos chart? That will help me determine if I like him or not
__________________
FBI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:16 AM   #318
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
Man people are really sour on Ortio. He had a decent season once Bob was basically forced to play him. I'd have no problem with him playing 20-30 games.
Watch him play lights out as a backup next year, only to lose him to Vegas because we have to leave him exposed
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:28 AM   #319
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
Man people are really sour on Ortio. He had a decent season once Bob was basically forced to play him. I'd have no problem with him playing 20-30 games.
All indications is that the Flames still aren't sold on him. Been said on 960 and by me. I said mid season I had caught wind that management was extremely disappointed in the threesome and at that they were planning to go clean slate at the position. The only way Ortio comes back I feel is if they acquire a starting goaltender on a big contract and can't fit in an experienced backup's salary. If they have to go with a guy like Reimer I feel they will also bring in a more experienced backup goaltender.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2016, 09:43 AM   #320
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Elliott and Reimer would probably come in at a combined cap hit of $5.5m-$6.5m. I would very happy with a tandem like that.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:57 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy