Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2016, 04:52 PM   #201
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
He's 30 years old, pending UFA that's going to get a huge contract.

There's more to player value than simply "he's good".
If you read my original post with that trade suggestion it says

"Considering there's a new contract worked out prior to the deal."

Yes he's 30 but it's doubtful he's going to slow down in the next 4-5 years.
jg13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 04:54 PM   #202
Mass_nerder
Franchise Player
 
Mass_nerder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
Exp:
Default

If we're paying a signficant price, I would rather walk away with Vasilevsky.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype View Post
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
Mass_nerder is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mass_nerder For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2016, 04:54 PM   #203
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13 View Post
If you read my original post with that trade suggestion it says

"Considering there's a new contract worked out prior to the deal."

Yes he's 30 but it's doubtful he's going to slow down in the next 4-5 years.
Why is that doubtful?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 04:56 PM   #204
Oil Stain
Franchise Player
 
Oil Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13 View Post
If you read my original post with that trade suggestion it says

"Considering there's a new contract worked out prior to the deal."

Yes he's 30 but it's doubtful he's going to slow down in the next 4-5 years.
I agree it's going to take more than 35+Klimchuk+McDonald to get Bishop, but he may go a little cheaper than usual due to the pending expansion.

If Tampa is offering him in trade that means they intend to protect Vasilesvskiy and will be forced to trade Bishop at some point this season or lose him for nothing.

I'd be surprised if other teams aren't in on him if he's available though. He's an upgrade on a lot of goalies.
Oil Stain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 04:56 PM   #205
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Why is that doubtful?
He should be right in the prime of his career. As a goalie he could have 3-4 more solid years in him at this stage. The question is whether larger goalies' bodies wear down faster. What sort of injury was Bishop hampered with these playoffs?
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 04:56 PM   #206
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Why is that doubtful?
Guys like 37 year old Luongo have been solid while aging.

Not sure why you're aruging with me on this, the price for Bishop as he is right now is going to be very high, perhaps even higher than my theoretical trade.
jg13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 04:57 PM   #207
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Starter quality goalies are usually pretty good until 35.

That should be more than enough time for a prospect to emerge, likely Gillies.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 05:07 PM   #208
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

IMO Bishop gets dealt if Stamkos has indicated he wants to return to Tampa, they need the cap space this season then.
SuperMatt18 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 05:28 PM   #209
Bend it like Bourgeois
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Sorry if this was asked, but can bishop even sign a deal before July 1?
Bend it like Bourgeois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 05:31 PM   #210
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bend it like Bourgeois View Post
Sorry if this was asked, but can bishop even sign a deal before July 1?
nope. He can't officially sign an extension until July 1st, but Flames can get a rough idea of what he wants and if that is workable from their end. (if they have permission to talk to him)
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2016, 05:32 PM   #211
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Regarding Ben Bishop, Yzerman said he's talked to other teams who are looking for a goalie. But doesn't know when or if a deal occurs...

via Lebrun
jg13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 05:33 PM   #212
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Pierre LeBrun @Real_ESPNLeBrun
Regarding Ben Bishop, Yzerman said he's talked to other teams who are looking for a goalie. But doesn't know when or if a deal occurs...
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2016, 05:34 PM   #213
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Yzerman hinting a 1st for tomorrow is involved?

Joe Smith @TBTimes_JSmith
#TBLightning Yzerman indicated if a first round pick is involved w goalie deal, it'd have to be done by tomorrow. But no guarantee.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 05:40 PM   #214
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Yzerman hinting a 1st for tomorrow is involved?

Joe Smith @TBTimes_JSmith
#TBLightning Yzerman indicated if a first round pick is involved w goalie deal, it'd have to be done by tomorrow. But no guarantee.

I can't imagine the flames would give up this years 1st. If flames give up a first for Bishop then it would be 2017. I really don't want them giving up 1st's for a goaltender.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 05:42 PM   #215
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Try to move 35 + 54 for a late first and add from there.

Big no to #6.
jg13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 05:45 PM   #216
thymebalm
#1 Goaltender
 
thymebalm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I would give up 6 for Bishop. 6 won't be ready for 3 years. Flames window to win is Brodie's contract. No point wasting his prime waiting for other grapes to ripen. I like the D, I like the Forward core. We need a goalie yesterday. No better goalie available than Bishop. We need him or Reimer by July 1
__________________
Death by 4th round picks.
thymebalm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 05:47 PM   #217
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

On one hand I get excited thinking about Bishop playing goal for the Flames next season.
On the other hand I cringe at the possible acquisition cost.

Still though, I doubt BT moves 6th overall for a goalie, any goalie. I could see a trade being done after July 1st though for next years 1st rounder. A goalie like Bishop would go a long frigging way to keeping that pick out of any draft lottery that's for sure.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 05:47 PM   #218
JurassicTunga12
Franchise Player
 
JurassicTunga12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

I like our defense, I'd like our goaltending if we got a guy like Bishop(signed) and with Gillies in the pipeline, but I can't get excited about the forward group just yet without at least 2 more quality wingers.
JurassicTunga12 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JurassicTunga12 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2016, 05:51 PM   #219
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

6th overall will or at least should never be traded for a rental.

Bishop is great but Yzerman is trading one year of him... look at the precedent for a goalie like Andersen still under team control long term, and apply to an older goalie, with one year left. He's got a better track record, but still worth no more, if not less.
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2016, 05:51 PM   #220
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

11 pages of discussion, and not a single mention of Rafikov as part of the package for Biship, with Yzerman and his affinity for Russians.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy