Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-07-2016, 10:23 AM   #221
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
I'm confused.
I had thought Gillies would have been exempt. Need to read up more I guess.
There hasn't been an official confirmation that expansion will even happen at this point.

It's probably somewhat safe to say that players with less than 2 years of pro-experience will be exempt, which would make Gillies exempt, but it's far from confirmed.
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Oling_Roachinen For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2016, 10:32 AM   #222
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
I'm confused.
I had thought Gillies would have been exempt. Need to read up more I guess.
Will have finished his 2nd professional season, so as far as I see it, he's not exempt.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 10:33 AM   #223
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Will have finished his 2nd professional season, so as far as I see it, he's not exempt.
The question is if the 7 games were enough for it to count as a professional season.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 10:35 AM   #224
Funkhouser
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Funkhouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Will have finished his 2nd professional season, so as far as I see it, he's not exempt.
Although his entry level contract has been underway for two seasons, he has not accrued enough games in either season to count as a 'professional season'. Technically next year will be his first professional season under the CBA.

It is my understanding (and I believe this has been hinted at elsewhere by Flames brass) that he will be exempt.
Funkhouser is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 11:31 AM   #225
Red Menace
Scoring Winger
 
Red Menace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montreal
Exp:
Default

Will Kylington be exempt?

I would think the most likely candidate to be "lost" at this point would by Jokipakka? maybe Bouma...or someone like Kylington, Shinkaruk, or Poirier (assuming they have to be protected and/or are not on our list)
Red Menace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 12:29 PM   #226
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef View Post
Frankly I didn't give two ####s which way this turned out because I firmly believe the Flames would have bought Wideman out if he had to be protected.
Wait, so you're a Flames fan but you don't care how this ruling was going to work out because they would have bought out Wideman and had significant money stuck on our cap for two more seasons?

That's insane.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 12:34 PM   #227
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
Wait, so you're a Flames fan but you don't care how this ruling was going to work out because they would have bought out Wideman and had significant money stuck on our cap for two more seasons?

That's insane.
I actually think getting rid of Wideman to create a spot for a guy like Nakladal would benefit the team. Otherwise you have a guy who's only here for next year using up a spot on your roster. One of the biggest reasons Schlemko left was because of how many D the Flames had signed. Personally I think it would be worth the money and cap bogey to get rid of Wideman from the roster.

The Flames have been well below the cap for like 3 straight years, and I even think this year they'll still come in a ways under with Gaudreau and Monahan signed and 3 boat anchor contracts.


Admittedly though, I'm not a fan of the player. I respect what he did two years ago, but 1 out of 4 seasons he's been a good player, the other 3 he's been between lousy and average.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sylvanfan For This Useful Post:
Old 06-07-2016, 12:41 PM   #228
MisterJoji
Franchise Player
 
MisterJoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
Exp:
Default UPD: Daly says no need to protect expiring contracts with NMC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan403 View Post
So with the Wideman thing cleared up, what will our protected list look like?

Givens: Monahan, Gaudreau, Bennett, Backlund, Frolik. After that it's going to be a really important season for the rest of the crew. Will Ferland finally push through and become a legit power forward prospect? Can he put up a 15-20 goal season this year? Has Shinkaruk surpassed him already if he doesn't make a major jump? Will Poirier have a breakout season? Was last seasons Colborne's peak? Does some dark horse guy like Klimchuk have a come out of nowhere season? Lots of variables there.

Gio, Brodie, Hamilton on D, no question. And I'd have to agree that Gillies (if he isn't exempt) would be the goalie prospect of the future to protect.

To further the question, who do you think is the most likely player to be drafted? I remember reading that LV has to pick at least one player from each team. But that will still leave a few teams with more than one player being picked to make Vegas have a full roster (both NHL and AHL). If Kylington isn't exempt, he's highly probable. Jokipakka will probably have some interest. Maybe Ortio if he has a bounce back year. And whoever is remaining out of Shinkaruk, Ferland, Colborne, etc. My guess, if it's 2, are Kylington and Poirier.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
MisterJoji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 12:45 PM   #229
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Expansion is a scary thing but remember they can only take 1 player from us and everyone else is losing players too, so we'll probably be alright.
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 12:50 PM   #230
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

It would be interesting to do the exercise to see what the expansion teams roster would look like.

It would seem that they'd have a team with decent depth as they'll be able to pick 30 legitimate mid roster caliber players. But they're going to lack top end talent. I wonder if they'll be looking to make some quantity for quality types of moves once the draft is over.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 12:58 PM   #231
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Will the expansion team really be drafting more than 30 players? I think between the expansion draft (assuming they only pick 30 players), the entry draft, free agency and trades, they should be able to get close to that 50 player limit fairly easily.

I don't think we have to fear losing two players.
_Q_ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 01:05 PM   #232
MisterJoji
Franchise Player
 
MisterJoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_ View Post
Will the expansion team really be drafting more than 30 players? I think between the expansion draft (assuming they only pick 30 players), the entry draft, free agency and trades, they should be able to get close to that 50 player limit fairly easily.

I don't think we have to fear losing two players.


Good point. Totally overlooked the draft and free agency.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
MisterJoji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 01:05 PM   #233
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan View Post
It would be interesting to do the exercise to see what the expansion teams roster would look like.

It would seem that they'd have a team with decent depth as they'll be able to pick 30 legitimate mid roster caliber players. But they're going to lack top end talent. I wonder if they'll be looking to make some quantity for quality types of moves once the draft is over.
I think someone should set up a mock Las Vegas this offseason just for fun.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 01:09 PM   #234
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

If two of Ferland, Poirier or Shinkaruk have strong years, there's a good chance one of those guys gets picked. Or maybe that causes BT to expose Backlund or Frolik. Or maybe it's Jokipakka who is gone. Regardless, we are losing someone decent.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 01:14 PM   #235
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

So much depends on the talent available on the other teams, but if I were to guess, I would say whomever ends up being our #4D (assuming it isn't Wideman): Kevin or Nak.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 01:15 PM   #236
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan View Post
I actually think getting rid of Wideman to create a spot for a guy like Nakladal would benefit the team. Otherwise you have a guy who's only here for next year using up a spot on your roster. One of the biggest reasons Schlemko left was because of how many D the Flames had signed. Personally I think it would be worth the money and cap bogey to get rid of Wideman from the roster.

The Flames have been well below the cap for like 3 straight years, and I even think this year they'll still come in a ways under with Gaudreau and Monahan signed and 3 boat anchor contracts.


Admittedly though, I'm not a fan of the player. I respect what he did two years ago, but 1 out of 4 seasons he's been a good player, the other 3 he's been between lousy and average.
Wideman has been good for us but his job has been taken by Hamilton and to some extent by Nakladal. I hope we can trade him this summer and not need to buy him out but yeah his days here should be over. As said we need room the for Nakladal and Wotherspoon or whoever beats him out for a spot.

Wotherspoon will need to pass through waivers if sent down so for me the choice is Wideman or Wotherspoon.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 01:21 PM   #237
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug View Post
So much depends on the talent available on the other teams, but if I were to guess, I would say whomever ends up being our #4D (assuming it isn't Wideman): Kevin or Nak.
I think there are going to be six defenseman better than Jokipakka or Nakladal available for LV to pick. The protection rules are designed in such a way that LV probably has six guys that are considered solid 3-5 guys on most teams by the time this is said and done. Jokipakka and Nakladal aren't there yet. I think the only way one of those guys goes is if Ferland, Shinkaruk and Poirier all have bad years.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 01:23 PM   #238
Red Menace
Scoring Winger
 
Red Menace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montreal
Exp:
Default

We might add another UFA winger this off season that we'll want to protect....that could move a Ferland or Colborne off the list as well.
Red Menace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 01:23 PM   #239
Incogneto
#1 Goaltender
 
Incogneto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary - Transplanted Manitoban
Exp:
Default

That Vegas team is going to be good. Taking the 10th best player on every team in the league leaves you with a pretty damn good roster.
Incogneto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2016, 01:24 PM   #240
Red Menace
Scoring Winger
 
Red Menace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montreal
Exp:
Default

Does it?
Red Menace is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Red Menace For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:32 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy