Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: World Cup of Hockey - Which team are you cheering for?
Canada 80 26.49%
Czech Republic 3 0.99%
Europe 6 1.99%
Finland 5 1.66%
North America 200 66.23%
Russia 3 0.99%
Sweden 4 1.32%
United States 1 0.33%
Voters: 302. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-30-2016, 02:02 PM   #41
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
How is this not best on best?
Because team North America makes the whole thing a joke, despite the fact that nobody on team North America was making Canada anyway.

If Corey Perry's not on the roster, there's not a snowball's chance in Hell Connor McJesus and his 48 points in 45 career NHL games gets to go.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:02 PM   #42
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Since none of the players at the young stars camp would be at the World Cup, I don't see why it wouldn't be held.

It's a valuable tool for all the clubs involved to evaluate the players.
Laine will be playing for Finland. He would likely have attended the Penticton tournament otherwise (assuming the Jets draft him and take part in Penticton again).

Not that it's a big deal since he likely would have only played in one game anyway (like McDavid last year).
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:09 PM   #43
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

None.

I think this is a stupid tournament and I'll be severely pissed off if it leads to Olympic non-participation. I think I'll maybe watch a Team North America game if Gaudreau and McDavid are on the same line since it might be the only occasion to ever see that. But otherwise I'm completely out on the World Cup.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Because team North America makes the whole thing a joke
I think it's really Team Europe that makes it a joke... they may as well have called it "Team Give Anze Kopitar A Snowballs Chance in Hell of winning a medal". Although Team North America is dumb as well.

Last edited by Parallex; 05-30-2016 at 02:13 PM.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:10 PM   #44
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
How is this not best on best?
Well first because North America and Rest of Europe aren't countries and second because they've split out U23's and made a "best of the rest" team.

You don't think a Best on Best USA team has Johnny on it? Or even Eichel? Saad?

Canada and the Euro teams are hurt less than the US, but limiting even one team from taking their best players means the legitimacy of this tournament is diminished.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:11 PM   #45
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
How is this not best on best?
USA without Gaudreau is a big loss.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2016, 02:14 PM   #46
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Well first because North America and Rest of Europe aren't countries and second because they've split out U23's and made a "best of the rest" team.

You don't think a Best on Best USA team has Johnny on it? Or even Eichel? Saad?

Canada and the Euro teams are hurt less than the US, but limiting even one team from taking their best players means the legitimacy of this tournament is diminished.
The USA team doesn't have Phil Kessel on it, so I don't know what to make of the way they selected their team.

Team Europe removes a bunch of teams nobody wants to see outside of their own small republics. And much like I'm opposed to starting World War 3 if Russia decides to annex Slovakia, I'm okay sacrificing that country's hockey team to ensure I don't watch Switzerland clog up the neutral zone for sixty minutes.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2016, 02:16 PM   #47
dino7c
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

its either best on best or its not

any restrictions on the players you can select makes it the latter
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:17 PM   #48
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
USA without Gaudreau is a big loss.
He's still in the tournament.

Team Europe is better than Team Slovakia.

A tourney without Anzi Kopitar, Slava Voynov, even Phill Kessel is also not a best on best tournament.
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:17 PM   #49
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Well first because North America and Rest of Europe aren't countries and second because they've split out U23's and made a "best of the rest" team.

You don't think a Best on Best USA team has Johnny on it? Or even Eichel? Saad?

Canada and the Euro teams are hurt less than the US, but limiting even one team from taking their best players means the legitimacy of this tournament is diminished.
Best on best doesn't necessarily have to be split based on countries.
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:24 PM   #50
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
Best on best doesn't necessarily have to be split based on countries.
The US and Canada have restrictions on who they can select as a result of age.

It's not a best on best.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2016, 02:33 PM   #51
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
The US and Canada have restrictions on who they can select as a result of age.

It's not a best on best.
Nobody on Team North America would have been named to Team Canada.

It sucks that some young stars aren't going to play for the US. But given how that team is constructed, I don't know if anyone outside Johnny makes it either.

This tournament is designed to get as many high end players as possible into the spotlight.

It's meant to be fun. See how it works.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:33 PM   #52
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
Best on best doesn't necessarily have to be split based on countries.
Don't be silly, of course it does.

If you're not splitting it by nations and you actually wanted it to be "best-on-best" then you'd just ignore nationality altogether and do something like a 6 team snake draft so all those people who wonder what hockey would be like in a universe where there was no expansion can get an answer.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:34 PM   #53
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
Don't be silly, of course it does.

If you're not splitting it by nations and you actually wanted it to be "best-on-best" then you'd just ignore nationality altogether and do something like a 6 team snake draft so all those people who wonder what hockey would be like in a universe where there was no expansion can get an answer.
That's a bloody brilliant idea. I'd go into so much debt to watch that live.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:34 PM   #54
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
Don't be silly, of course it does.

If you're not splitting it by nations and you actually wanted it to be "best-on-best" then you'd just ignore nationality altogether and do something like a 6 team snake draft so all those people who wonder what hockey would be like in a universe where there was no expansion can get an answer.
So, an expanded all-star game?
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:36 PM   #55
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
This tournament is designed to get as many high end players as possible into the spotlight.
This tournament is designed to make as much money as possible.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:36 PM   #56
Firebot
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

I expect this tournament to bomb. Does anyone even remember the 2004 World Cup? The lockout happened days after it ended. The World Cup / Canada Cup was made obselete with the NHL participation in the Olympics. Now the NHL is willing to walk away from the Olympics and go back to the World Cup, and pretend it will work?

To me it seems to be only slightly above the all star game, especially with so many omissions and the separate under 23 games.
Firebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:37 PM   #57
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
So, an expanded all-star game?
And now it doesn't seem so brilliant...

Look, everyone has a reason to play in this new format. Everyone on North America will likely want to prove that they could've made their national teams. Team Europe represents the first time most of those players have had a shot to actually win won of these events.

The rest of the teams are still wearing their country's colors. If anyone is risking pulling a no-show, it's the Russians.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:47 PM   #58
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
This tournament is designed to make as much money as possible.
Yes. By loading up on star power.

Without North America, we don't get to see the following players:

Connor McDavid
Sean Monahan
Jonathan Drouin
Shayne Gostisbehere
Morgan Reilly
Ryan Murray
Aaron Ekblad
Brandon Saad
Dylan Larkin
Auston Matthews
Mark Sheifele
Nathan MacKinnon
Matt Murray
John Gibson

The argument doesn't hold up quite as well for team Europe, but I would argue that team is still going to try and score goals, instead of the Swiss emulating their World War 2 strategies on ice. And we still wouldn't get to see Kopitar, Josi, Streit, Andersen, Zucarrello etc.

I want to see McDavid and Gaudreau play together more than I want to watch an aging Slovak team or a boring Swiss one.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:49 PM   #59
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

How hard will players go when they haven't had a training camp and could risk injury?
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 02:52 PM   #60
midniteowl
Franchise Player
 
midniteowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

A silly but honest question, will there be no national anthem be played in this tournament then? If there will be, what or which anthem will be played when Team NA and Team EU play?
midniteowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:57 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy