05-30-2016, 07:36 AM
|
#141
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mass_nerder
Some of the details of the facade/crown on Brookfield are really cool.
I haven't been following this thread closely, so I'm not sure if anyone pointed this out or has noticed, but the chamfer radius of the building's corners gets larger as the building rises. The facade corners are a single piece of rounded glass.
The crown uses similar rounded panels of glass at the peak when it bends back downward toward the roof.
|
It's going to be a nice addition to the skyline for sure. I just wish it was a little taller to distance itself from the other three towers that are in the same ballpark. Don't want to make downtown look like Vancouver where all the towers are the same height (yes I know it's because of restrictions).
|
|
|
05-30-2016, 08:04 AM
|
#142
|
Franchise Player
|
I didn't know Vancouver had restrictions on the height of their towers.
|
|
|
05-30-2016, 08:38 AM
|
#143
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
I didn't know Vancouver had restrictions on the height of their towers.
|
Ya Vancouver has all sorts of restrictions, in addition to the height one they also have lots of protected views and things like that so you end up with some different designs.
Edmonton used to have a height restriction due to the Municipal airport, now that it is gone they are wide open and currently building what will be the tallest tower outside of Toronto when done (Stantec). It will be 3.8m taller than Brookfield, but in my opinion is a far poorer looking tower than Brookfield, The Bow, and Telus Sky which will all be up there with it.
http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=72911149
Last edited by Bigtime; 05-30-2016 at 08:43 AM.
|
|
|
05-30-2016, 08:42 AM
|
#144
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime
Edmonton used to have a height restriction due to the Municipal airport, now that it is gone they are wide open and currently building what will be the tallest tower outside of Edmonton when done (Stantec).
|
Tallest tower outside of Edmonton, being built in Edmonton. Woah!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-30-2016, 08:43 AM
|
#145
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Whoops, edited!
|
|
|
05-30-2016, 08:54 AM
|
#146
|
 Posted the 6 millionth post!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime
Edmonton used to have a height restriction due to the Municipal airport, now that it is gone they are wide open and currently building what will be the tallest tower outside of Toronto when done (Stantec). It will be 3.8m taller than Brookfield, but in my opinion is a far poorer looking tower than Brookfield, The Bow, and Telus Sky which will all be up there with it.
|
Hoesntly Brookfield is nothing to write home about. It's pretty plain Jane, it's just tall.
Telus Sky will be the one to watch as an awesome new building. Did you know that the same building is being built in Vancouver, just vertically reversed? I thought that was cool.
|
|
|
05-30-2016, 08:59 AM
|
#147
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
Hoesntly Brookfield is nothing to write home about. It's pretty plain Jane, it's just tall.
Telus Sky will be the one to watch as an awesome new building. Did you know that the same building is being built in Vancouver, just vertically reversed? I thought that was cool.
|
I think the detail and quality of Brookfield at least makes it better than Stantec, and I know I'm speaking before Stantec even starts to rise from ground level (think it's close though). The glass looks fantastic, the rounded corners radius increasing is a neat visual effect, and hopefully the crown looks sharp and lights up real nice.
But yeah, Telus Sky is the one I'm most excited about. And yup I knew about their Vancouver tower that is very similar to it and a flip.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-30-2016, 09:12 AM
|
#148
|
Franchise Player
|
Brookfield looks very boring. I don't know anyone else who thinks otherwise.
|
|
|
05-30-2016, 09:15 AM
|
#149
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Well you know me on here, I don't think it's boring. It's a simple, well done box (rectangle if you want to get picky).
|
|
|
05-30-2016, 09:35 AM
|
#150
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime
I think the detail and quality of Brookfield at least makes it better than Stantec, and I know I'm speaking before Stantec even starts to rise from ground level (think it's close though). The glass looks fantastic, the rounded corners radius increasing is a neat visual effect, and hopefully the crown looks sharp and lights up real nice.
But yeah, Telus Sky is the one I'm most excited about. And yup I knew about their Vancouver tower that is very similar to it and a flip.
|
Imagine how sexy Telus Sky would have been at 275 - 280M!
|
|
|
05-30-2016, 09:41 AM
|
#151
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz
Brookfield looks very boring. I don't know anyone else who thinks otherwise.
|
I've heard lots say they like the look of it with the rounded corners and pure glass look, along with the height. I guess it's an anecdotal stand off!
|
|
|
05-30-2016, 10:19 AM
|
#152
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz
Brookfield looks very boring. I don't know anyone else who thinks otherwise.
|
IMO it's nicer than the Bow which is nothing but a taller version of Toronto's city hall. Brookfield has a lot of modern tower styling cues.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-30-2016, 11:18 AM
|
#154
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Also I saw on skyscraperspage that Telus Sky has risen above ground level! That puts to rest my fear of them capping it at grade cause of the recession and all of vacancy downtown.
|
|
|
05-30-2016, 12:30 PM
|
#155
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
|
There are a number of towers in downtown that were capped at grade and never got started back up again. The south block of The Bow was supposed to be rebuilt from the bricks of the old York Hotel. That was capped at grade and is just a parking garage. First Canadian Centre is another one, the north-west corner of 2 Street and 7 Avenue.
Are there any instances of previously capped-at-grade projects being restarted and completed? Or is it basically a death sentence to the project once the at-grade cap is complete?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
IMO it's nicer than the Bow which is nothing but a taller version of Toronto's city hall. Brookfield has a lot of modern tower styling cues.
|
This might be the most ridiculous thing I've seen said about The Bow.
__________________
-James
GO FLAMES GO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TorqueDog For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-30-2016, 12:36 PM
|
#156
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
|
So is anyone going to be in Brookfield when it opens?
Cenovus isn't planning on moving anyone over, what about the other floors?
|
|
|
05-30-2016, 12:40 PM
|
#157
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
This might be the most ridiculous thing I've seen said about The Bow.
|
That it looks like a taller version of Toronto city hall? Sorry but that styling isn't original. It's not terrible but it's no work of art and not going through with the original height left it looking like a boring wide building from certain angles.
|
|
|
05-30-2016, 12:41 PM
|
#158
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
Also I saw on skyscraperspage that Telus Sky has risen above ground level! That puts to rest my fear of them capping it at grade cause of the recession and all of vacancy downtown.
|
That's excellent! And I don't think they could really cut back on the design either as it's so unique, right? I know buildings in other cities that have been taller in design and because of simplicity they were able to budget cut a bunch of floors off.
I would imagine Telus Sky was either going to get built pretty much exactly how it was proposed or not at all.
|
|
|
05-30-2016, 12:42 PM
|
#159
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
Are there any instances of previously capped-at-grade projects being restarted and completed? Or is it basically a death sentence to the project once the at-grade cap is complete?
|
The only one that may qualify would be the Arriva towers in Beltline. Tower 2 and 3 capped at grade after Torode went bankrupt, site purchased by Nic Hon and he has since built the two Guardian towers on the site.
FCC2 has had two new design proposals since I started skyscraper geeking out in 2005. Both have amounted to nothing though.
Strategic bought the site that is almost at grade on 10th avenue and Macleod trail and has plans to build a tower there, working name of the development is "One".
Edit: Oh and on 10th avenue and 8th street area of Beltline the two towers that have gone up west of Mark on 10th. They were also from a capped project. Yet another one pops into my head! The Metropolitan condo on 11th avenue by the Midtown Co-op. Another grade capped one that eventually went ahead with a different design.
Last edited by Bigtime; 05-30-2016 at 12:49 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-30-2016, 12:53 PM
|
#160
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime
The only one that may qualify would be the Arriva towers in Beltline. Tower 2 and 3 capped at grade after Torode went bankrupt, site purchased by Nic Hon and he has since built the two Guardian towers on the site.
FCC2 has had two new design proposals since I started skyscraper geeking out in 2005. Both have amounted to nothing though.
Strategic bought the site that is almost at grade on 10th avenue and Macleod trail and has plans to build a tower there, working name of the development is "One".
Edit: Oh and on 10th avenue and 8th street area of Beltline the two towers that have gone up west of Mark on 10th. They were also from a capped project. Yet another one pops into my head! The Metropolitan condo on 11th avenue by the Midtown Co-op. Another grade capped one that eventually went ahead with a different design.
|
The Mid Town one was a little different as it was stalled out a few floors above grade and then they completely changed and rezoned it from a condo tower to a short office block. I'm trying to remember but I don't think they even added any floors to it. (were talking about the one beside Tantra/Mansion/Rodneys, right?)
Last edited by polak; 05-30-2016 at 12:57 PM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 PM.
|
|