Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: What is a fair $ for Joe Colborne?
Flames shouldn't qualify him and let him walk. 10 2.46%
Less than $1.5 million 11 2.70%
Between $1.5 to $2 million 91 22.36%
Between $2 million and $2.5 million 172 42.26%
Between $2.5 million and $3 million 99 24.32%
Between $3 million and $3.5 million 18 4.42%
Between $3.5 million and $4 million 4 0.98%
More than $4 million 2 0.49%
Voters: 407. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-26-2016, 01:56 PM   #21
N-E-B
Franchise Player
 
N-E-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

There's seriously people comfortable paying him more than $2mil/year? Yikes. If Colborne asked for $3.6mil/year I would hope Treliving would laugh and let him walk.

I don't hate Colborne, but I think it's a bad idea to pay bottom 6 players much more than $2mil/year.
N-E-B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 02:01 PM   #22
Madrox
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Smoking hole in the ground
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N-E-B View Post
There's seriously people comfortable paying him more than $2mil/year? Yikes. If Colborne asked for $3.6mil/year I would hope Treliving would laugh and let him walk.

I don't hate Colborne, but I think it's a bad idea to pay bottom 6 players much more than $2mil/year.
Is he a bottom 6 player? He scored at a second line rate this year, and he played over 15 minutes a game. He's closer to a top 6 than a bottom 6.
Madrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 02:02 PM   #23
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madrox View Post
Is he a bottom 6 player? He scored at a second line rate this year, and he played over 15 minutes a game. He's closer to a top 6 than a bottom 6.
That says more about the Flames than of Colborne
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 05-26-2016, 02:08 PM   #24
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Wow so if an arbitrator awards him just under $3.9MM, the Flames have to accept it?

I like him more than most people round here, but he's not worth that much. David Jones 2.0.
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 02:17 PM   #25
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

$2.5 x 3 years
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 02:18 PM   #26
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

if he wants anything more than 2.5 then I think you look to deal him. I like him and think he does well with Backlund and Frolik but it hast to be reasonable, he is a decent trade chip though.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 02:22 PM   #27
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Give him Lance Bouma money 3 yr 6.6 total (2.1m, 2.2, 2.3).
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 02:25 PM   #28
Demetric
Scoring Winger
 
Demetric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
Exp:
Default

traded for Kreider
__________________
Let the Yutes play!
Demetric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 02:25 PM   #29
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

I think the Flames will trade his rights to avoid a potential unfavorable arbitration ruling if they can't get him signed before July 1. Can't take the risk he gets $3m-$3.9m with the team's cap situation.

That being said, Hoffman only got $2m in arbitration after a 27 goal 48 point season so that bodes well as he is a good comparable. However I still don't think the Flames will risk it. If he doesn't play ball I think he gets traded.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fire of the Phoenix For This Useful Post:
Old 05-26-2016, 02:25 PM   #30
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

was he getting more ice time in march - or did he change his stick or get new skates or something.

I like joe, but not at something close to $4.0m/year. stuns me that guys like him could make that kind of money. although I will acknowledge that there are only about a 100 guys in the world at his skill level for this sport
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 02:47 PM   #31
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

I think that at this point it needs to be a 1 year deal. Ideally it will be less than $2.5M. At this point I see a lot more risk than reward in any long term commitment to Joe. A lot of his performance will depend on the new head coach, and his ability to consistently produce.
If we sign Joe to 3 year $2.5M-$3M contract there are three scenarios:
  1. He returns to the same level of play he showed at the beginning of last season, in that case he is $1-1.5M overpaid.
  2. He produces at the same rate he did over the last 2 seasons(14G, 36P in 69GP per season), in which case it is a fair contract.
  3. He keeps producing like he did at the end of the season (9G, 20P in the last 20GP). In that case he would be a bargain and save us about $3M in cap space.
Unfortunately, I see one of the first two scenarios a lot more likely than the latter.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 02:49 PM   #32
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northendzone View Post
was he getting more ice time in march - or did he change his stick or get new skates or something.
Got put on Backlund and Frolik's line + had (IIRC) a 25% shooting percentage spike. AKA he got put with the two guys on the team that are best at pushing play into the offensive zone then had a run of good puck luck.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 02:49 PM   #33
bigrangy
Franchise Player
 
bigrangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp:
Default

Colborne has one of the stupidest most non-sensical applications of advanced stats in his favour with his production late this year. You know how everyone thought Crosby was playing ridiculous hockey from the all-star break onwards? Colborne was matching Crosby's rate (even-strength points/60) of production from feb 1 through the end of the season. JoCo was producing like a legitimate top 10 player for 30 games, and his agent knows that. I could see JoCo signing a 1 year bridge, hoping to play more like he did at the end of the year all season. He'd get a monster contract if he even fell off a bit.

I like JoCo a lot, and I feel there is significant risk with his contract, but I think he can be a long-term part of the Flames.

If Brad were to sign him to a 6-year, 2/yr deal, I don't know if it would necessarily be a bad thing.
bigrangy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 02:51 PM   #34
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Colborne saw production increase for the same reason Bouma did the year before: Backlund
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
Old 05-26-2016, 03:21 PM   #35
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrangy View Post
Colborne has one of the stupidest most non-sensical applications of advanced stats in his favour with his production late this year. You know how everyone thought Crosby was playing ridiculous hockey from the all-star break onwards? Colborne was matching Crosby's rate (even-strength points/60) of production from feb 1 through the end of the season. JoCo was producing like a legitimate top 10 player for 30 games, and his agent knows that. I could see JoCo signing a 1 year bridge, hoping to play more like he did at the end of the year all season. He'd get a monster contract if he even fell off a bit.

I like JoCo a lot, and I feel there is significant risk with his contract, but I think he can be a long-term part of the Flames.

If Brad were to sign him to a 6-year, 2/yr deal, I don't know if it would necessarily be a bad thing.
6 years seems like way too long. Not sure why Colborne would agree to that. I do think he will be in the $2mil range, give or take.

An just no, to "JoCo".
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 03:36 PM   #36
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I have an Oiler friend who said he'd do a Colborne for Yakupov deal. I could live with that.
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 03:39 PM   #37
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Until we find some better RWers there's a good chance Colborne will be getting top-6 minutes this season.

To be honest I would like to see him on the top line unless we sign or trade for a guy like Okposo. He has good hands, is big enough to leverage for position in front of the net & on the boards & has shown chemisty with Monahan in the past.

Sign him long term at $2m then turn him into a top 6 winger. Abbracadabra
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 03:41 PM   #38
CroFlames
Franchise Player
 
CroFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Hah JoCo.

I'm using that just to irk people.
CroFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CroFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 05-26-2016, 03:50 PM   #39
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla View Post
Until we find some better RWers there's a good chance Colborne will be getting top-6 minutes this season.

To be honest I would like to see him on the top line unless we sign or trade for a guy like Okposo. He has good hands, is big enough to leverage for position in front of the net & on the boards & has shown chemisty with Monahan in the past.
Tried this past season and didn't work.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 03:57 PM   #40
midniteowl
Franchise Player
 
midniteowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man View Post
I have an Oiler friend who said he'd do a Colborne for Yakupov deal. I could live with that.
Yakupov is getting paid $2.5 millions, I'd rather pay that to Joe Colborne
midniteowl is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to midniteowl For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:36 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy