Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Result: 1 bad / 10 Amazing
10 4 3.42%
9 0 0%
8 0 0%
7 4 3.42%
6 12 10.26%
5 13 11.11%
4 14 11.97%
3 44 37.61%
2 20 17.09%
1 6 5.13%
Voters: 117. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-11-2016, 09:13 AM   #1
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default Simulator Fix : April 11th

http://www.calgarypuck.com/2016/04/d...ix-april-11th/
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 04-11-2016, 09:18 AM   #2
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Canucks landing Mathews would suck, but otherwise I don't mind that result
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 09:41 AM   #3
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I like the Leafs and Oilers falling out of the top 3. Sucks to see the Flames move back but unfortunately it's the most likely outcome.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 10:02 AM   #4
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

61% chance we draft 6th or 7th. So we'll see those results a lot between now and the 30th. I'm happy with a top 7 pick. Top 3 would be incredible though.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 10:03 AM   #5
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

I don't worry too much what the other guy gets although their motives are interesting, and it seems that many here want Dubois, so we get our man. That's got to be a decent result so I voted a "5".
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 10:16 AM   #6
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
61% chance we draft 6th or 7th. So we'll see those results a lot between now and the 30th. I'm happy with a top 7 pick. Top 3 would be incredible though.
Totally agree, but I can't help but run the thing once a day just to see how that would go.

Thought I may as well put it up for discussion to keep us all discussing outcomes for the next three weeks.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 04-11-2016, 10:20 AM   #7
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Totally agree, but I can't help but run the thing once a day just to see how that would go.

Thought I may as well put it up for discussion to keep us all discussing outcomes for the next three weeks.
Yep I'm game. As for this result I love landing Dubois. But I hate EDM or VAN winning a top two pick. So mixed feelings on it.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 10:21 AM   #8
Red Menace
Scoring Winger
 
Red Menace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montreal
Exp:
Default

Here's my new (admittedly illogical) way of looking at it: Almost every time you run the simulation at least 1 of the lowest 3 teams fall from the top 3. (Maybe someone smarter than me can figure out how much that actually happens)
That being the case at least 1 team from outside the bottom 3 will likely move up.
Being 5th worst, we have the 2nd best chance of anyone to move up to the top 3...
So really we still have a very good (or decent) chance to move up...at least that's what I keep telling myself.
Red Menace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 10:23 AM   #9
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Totally agree, but I can't help but run the thing once a day just to see how that would go.

Thought I may as well put it up for discussion to keep us all discussing outcomes for the next three weeks.
Yeah it's easy to do the simulation over several times after you don't like the first outcome. The first outcome is what's going to matter when the NHL pushes the button so I like this approach.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 10:39 AM   #10
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Yeah it's easy to do the simulation over several times after you don't like the first outcome. The first outcome is what's going to matter when the NHL pushes the button so I like this approach.
Exactly.

Oh that one sucks, run it again, nope ... run it again.

But run it once and then think about what that would mean makes it a little easier to get your head around.

Hate Vancouver getting Matthews the year after the Oilers get McDavid doesn't seem right from a karma standpoint.

I do think 2 of the bottom 3 are going to exit the bottom three, and that could help end tanking in future seasons. Time will tell though.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 10:41 AM   #11
Robo
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Exp:
Default

The only real thing i care about is that the coilers dont get another 1st overall
Robo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 10:41 AM   #12
Five-hole
Franchise Player
 
Five-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
Exp:
Default

Here's my question. Which do you rank more highly -- (1) the Flames getting a top 3 pick, or (2) Edmonton falling out of the top 3?

In other words, would you rather:

(A) Flames draft 7th, Oilers draft 4th?
OR
(B) Flames draft 2nd, Oilers draft 1st?

Normally I would think, take the best possible option for the Flames and run laughing. But the Flames will still get a great player at 7th, and arguably already have a brighter future than the Oilers. However, the Oil grabbing Matthews or Laine could really free them up to address some holes in their roster.

Tough call. I think I pick (B).
Five-hole is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Five-hole For This Useful Post:
Old 04-11-2016, 10:43 AM   #13
ZedMan
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Exp:
Default

B by miles. Although I'll feel a pang of sympathy for Mr. Matthews.
ZedMan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ZedMan For This Useful Post:
Old 04-11-2016, 10:43 AM   #14
Robo
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Exp:
Default

I just ran it and got columbus, colarado, and winnipeg..... Do over!
Robo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 10:43 AM   #15
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five-hole View Post
Here's my question. Which do you rank more highly -- (1) the Flames getting a top 3 pick, or (2) Edmonton falling out of the top 3?

In other words, would you rather:

(A) Flames draft 7th, Oilers draft 4th?
OR
(B) Flames draft 2nd, Oilers draft 1st?

Normally I would think, take the best possible option for the Flames and run laughing. But the Flames will still get a great player at 7th, and arguably already have a brighter future than the Oilers. However, the Oil grabbing Matthews or Laine could really free them up to address some holes in their roster.

Tough call. I think I pick (B).
If the Flames get Laine/Matthews, I don't care who the Oilers get that much.

If we don't, Id forfeit a slot or two to make sure they don't pick Top 3. Even if Vancouver or the Leafs get 1 or 2.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-11-2016, 10:51 AM   #16
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

This new system screws legit sports teams like the Flames.

There is no way Flames should draft any lower than 5th. Potentially dropping two places for an 8 % chance at #1 is just magic beans gambling idiocy. Just another stupid NHL gimmick.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 11:00 AM   #17
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Okay I just ran it and got 1. Calgary, 2. Leafs and 3. Canucks. This puts me in a quandary because I want Laine. I guess in this make believe world, we could make a deal with the Leafs.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 11:06 AM   #18
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo View Post
I just ran it and got columbus, colarado, and winnipeg..... Do over!
Did you vote 10 by mistake?
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 11:29 AM   #19
mikephoen
#1 Goaltender
 
mikephoen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

I voted 6. Any result that causes edmonton to fall out of the top 3 works for me.
mikephoen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 11:36 AM   #20
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five-hole View Post
Here's my question. Which do you rank more highly -- (1) the Flames getting a top 3 pick, or (2) Edmonton falling out of the top 3?

In other words, would you rather:

(A) Flames draft 7th, Oilers draft 4th?
OR
(B) Flames draft 2nd, Oilers draft 1st?

Normally I would think, take the best possible option for the Flames and run laughing. But the Flames will still get a great player at 7th, and arguably already have a brighter future than the Oilers. However, the Oil grabbing Matthews or Laine could really free them up to address some holes in their roster.

Tough call. I think I pick (B).
I take B. Not only do I think the oilers will get Matthews, I hope they do. I want the oil to get the first overall pick every year from now on because they'll still find a way to screw it up. Look at McJesus and how he's the future of the franchise, future captain, future face of the team and all that crap that goes with it. The kid is going to go crazy and then they'll just replace him with the next first overall pick. I think another first would also be great so they could have 5 first overall picks to go with their 5 cups 30 years ago.

The main reason I'd take B is because I don't care who the oilers screw up if it gets the Flames a kid like Laine. The oil will find a way to make the worst out of the best situation while the Flames will make the best out of a meh situation.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:44 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy