And you have attempted a counter argument based on the same stats and the same amount of not watching him at all.
Getting 10 points in 10 games, and yet managing to be -8, isn't easy. It's a stat that's worthy of comment.
The purpose of quoting stats is to analyse. Which we all do. It's also possible to counter without being an ass.
I don't think I was an ass at all and it's more a matter of you having thin skin. Remember you made this post which was nothing more than assumption;
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
sounds like a real team player
I didn't say his stats indicated he was great/terrible or team player/selfish and I don't need to see the games to know that 8 goals in 9 games in the AHL is impressive regardless of the other stats. You came to the conclusion he was selfish based on his +/- so you aren't going to win this argument so I suggest you let it go and if you don't like being called out on a baseless assumption I suggest you stop doing it to others as you have done in the past.
Last edited by Erick Estrada; 04-07-2016 at 09:34 AM.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
They are calling him up and by doing so burning a year of his UFA status (and hurting his trade value), obviously they really don't care if they think he can help them win.
They are calling him up and by doing so burning a year of his UFA status (and hurting his trade value), obviously they really don't care if they think he can help them win.
Of course they are going to utilize him if he can help the team. That doesn't make everything else just disappear though.
Of course they are going to utilize him if he can help the team. That doesn't make everything else just disappear though.
Winning can make a lot vanish.
A guy on the Fan was just saying, if Drouin comes back and gets plunked on the 4th line again, nothing is solved.
If he skates in the top 9, and produces, then all this likely becomes water under the bridge.
Winning can make a lot vanish.
A guy on the Fan was just saying, if Drouin comes back and gets plunked on the 4th line again, nothing is solve.
If he skates in the top 9, and produces, then all this likely becomes water under the bridge.
I will be eager to see how he does. I imagine both he and his agent know that he has to work hard and produce, but also do his best to fit in and work within Cooper's system. If it works out, everything that has happened is water under the bridge - until his contract negotiations anyways.
It means that he thinks that your argument is bad since you seem to be projecting the value of this opinion from only the basis that it belongs to a radio personality. In other words: "Radio guy" is right because he is on the radio—only, I don't think that was your point.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls
Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
If you're just quoting someone rather than plagiarizing them, and not even naming who they are, it's hardly an appeal to authority. Just giving credit to whoever had an original thought.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
__________________
Sure, Edmonton sucks, but I don't want Kid Hee-haw and his heiress from la-di-da St. Louis dissing it - that's OUR dumb kid brother, not thiers. -Courtesy of Jammies