Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which would you prefer?
Signing Jankowski 315 94.03%
Taking the compensation (51st pick in the 2017 draft) 20 5.97%
Voters: 335. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-29-2016, 01:35 PM   #641
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

really can't wait to finally see Jankowski in action, I hope it gets done soon.

Still think Alex Killorn is the best comparison in terms of development and progression so far. Both have mid September birthdays and were pretty much the youngest players in their draft years, both were drafted out of high school/lower profile programs, both were lanky kids who needed to bulk up at college (Killorn was listed at 6'1 and 160 when drafted). Killorn had 109 points in 130 NCAA games, Jankowski had 110 in 148. The only difference is that Jankowski immediately went to Providence after the draft, while Killorn spent another year at high school. Killorn has since developed into a solid 2nd/3rd line player in the NHL ... if Jankowski can mirror that, I'll be extremely happy.
devo22 is offline  
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-29-2016, 01:41 PM   #642
MarkGio
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamer View Post
Hot Karl.

Hot Karl was a terrible nickname. It should've been something Kung fu related. His game winning celebrations were GOAT
MarkGio is offline  
Old 03-29-2016, 01:41 PM   #643
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Friedman

News Update

The status of Calgary’s Mark Jankowski is different because the Providence College forward was a first-rounder. If no deal is reached, the Flames get a compensatory pick, which would be 51st overall. (The formula is simple: 30 spots later than where a player was originally selected.) The issue in Jankowski’s case is bonuses. The club and the agent (Wade Arnott) are arm-wrestling over them.
sureLoss is offline  
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 03-29-2016, 01:43 PM   #644
MarkGio
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Bonuses are tied to cap hit right? Hence why Shultz's ELC was a 3 million cap hit?
MarkGio is offline  
Old 03-29-2016, 01:44 PM   #645
Fan in Exile
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Friedman

News Update

The status of Calgary’s Mark Jankowski is different because the Providence College forward was a first-rounder. If no deal is reached, the Flames get a compensatory pick, which would be 51st overall. (The formula is simple: 30 spots later than where a player was originally selected.) The issue in Jankowski’s case is bonuses. The club and the agent (Wade Arnott) are arm-wrestling over them.
That sounds positive I think. How many of the bonuses are really negotiable anyway? I thought most of them were already set on entry level contracts.
Fan in Exile is offline  
Old 03-29-2016, 01:45 PM   #646
saXon
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Friedman

News Update

The status of Calgary’s Mark Jankowski is different because the Providence College forward was a first-rounder. If no deal is reached, the Flames get a compensatory pick, which would be 51st overall. (The formula is simple: 30 spots later than where a player was originally selected.) The issue in Jankowski’s case is bonuses. The club and the agent (Wade Arnott) are arm-wrestling over them.
This has never made sense to me in terms of NCAA signings. Give them max, and if they don't hit the bonuses, then they don't get paid. Also with a year burned on ELC, it shouldn't matter all that much.
__________________

saXon is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to saXon For This Useful Post:
Old 03-29-2016, 01:47 PM   #647
northcrunk
#1 Goaltender
 
northcrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22 View Post
nothing is worse than "Benzo".
Jenzo? Janker? Janks?
northcrunk is offline  
Old 03-29-2016, 01:47 PM   #648
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22 View Post
really can't wait to finally see Jankowski in action, I hope it gets done soon.

Still think Alex Killorn is the best comparison in terms of development and progression so far. Both have mid September birthdays and were pretty much the youngest players in their draft years, both were drafted out of high school/lower profile programs, both were lanky kids who needed to bulk up at college (Killorn was listed at 6'1 and 160 when drafted). Killorn had 109 points in 130 NCAA games, Jankowski had 110 in 148. The only difference is that Jankowski immediately went to Providence after the draft, while Killorn spent another year at high school. Killorn has since developed into a solid 2nd/3rd line player in the NHL ... if Jankowski can mirror that, I'll be extremely happy.
Both were drafted by Jay Feaster
GranteedEV is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Old 03-29-2016, 01:49 PM   #649
canflip_101
Backup Goalie
 
canflip_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 403
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay View Post
How is Benzo bad? It's slang for a Benz, which is a dope car.


BENZO
canflip_101 is offline  
Old 03-29-2016, 01:50 PM   #650
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

While the CBA caps how much an ELC can earn with Schedule A and Schedule B bonuses, which bonuses and how much for each bonus is still negotiable.
sureLoss is offline  
Old 03-29-2016, 01:51 PM   #651
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

If the only issue is bonuses, then I can't see how a deal doesn't get done.

if Jankowski intended to go to free agency, then I doubt the talks would have gotten to the point of haggling about bonuses.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline  
Old 03-29-2016, 01:52 PM   #652
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
If the only issue is bonuses, then I can't see how a deal doesn't get done.

if Jankowski intended to go to free agency, then I doubt the talks would have gotten to the point of haggling about bonuses.
agreed he would have simply flipped them the bird like Vesey did to Nashville
Alberta_Beef is offline  
Old 03-29-2016, 01:54 PM   #653
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

I'm out of goo to eat! Now what?
Finger Cookin is offline  
Old 03-29-2016, 02:03 PM   #654
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin View Post
I'm out of goo to eat! Now what?
CDC Paste
Bingo is offline  
Old 03-29-2016, 02:05 PM   #655
Fan in Exile
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
While the CBA caps how much an ELC can earn with Schedule A and Schedule B bonuses, which bonuses and how much for each bonus is still negotiable.
The only reason I can see Treliving concerned about the bonuses is a belief that Jankowski will be on the roster next season. I say that because for Treliving, he seems to be concerned with the cap and if Jankowski is spending the year in the AHL I really can't see it mattering.
Fan in Exile is offline  
Old 03-29-2016, 02:06 PM   #656
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
CDC Paste
Don't you have a monopoly on that?
burn_this_city is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to burn_this_city For This Useful Post:
Old 03-29-2016, 02:07 PM   #657
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

In case anyone is wondering, Wade Arnott works for Newport Sports Management which also represents Sean Monahan.
sureLoss is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 03-29-2016, 02:10 PM   #658
Leeman4Gilmour
First Line Centre
 
Leeman4Gilmour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Normally, my desk
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
While the CBA caps how much an ELC can earn with Schedule A and Schedule B bonuses, which bonuses and how much for each bonus is still negotiable.
I would guess the only real negotiation would be the player wanting the minimum requirements for the schedule A bonuses while the team would be wanting to up those a bit?
Leeman4Gilmour is offline  
Old 03-29-2016, 02:15 PM   #659
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

If the bonuses are met can they not roll over to the next year when we have a ton of cap space coming up?
Or is that only for 35+ contract like Iggy in Boston?
Jacks is offline  
Old 03-29-2016, 02:15 PM   #660
Cycling76er
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Cycling76er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Exp:
Default

This thread needs a title modification. Every time I log in I see "Jankowski/Gilmour signing..." and think "It's done!" :|
Cycling76er is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Cycling76er For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy