Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which would you prefer?
Signing Jankowski 315 94.03%
Taking the compensation (51st pick in the 2017 draft) 20 5.97%
Voters: 335. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-27-2016, 10:58 AM   #261
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
I will be shocked if Jankowski isn't welcomes into the Flame fold by lunch Monday.
Pretty much. Give him a coupe days to decompress from College. His team just eliminated, he was so sick he couldn't play, had to be heart breaking. Take some time to come down from that, then sign ready to move onto the Flames.
MrMastodonFarm is offline  
Old 03-27-2016, 11:00 AM   #262
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

I am sure Flames want him to sign but a 2nd round pick is likely not far from his value today.

That is no reflection on whether he makes it, just his likely value. If Flames had to shop Poirier right now, I suspect a 2nd is what they'd be looking at.
Strange Brew is offline  
Old 03-27-2016, 11:06 AM   #263
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Funkhouser View Post
From my understanding, in order to accrue a professional season he needs to play 10 or more games, so even though he will burn a contract year, the summer of 2018 he will be finishing his second pro season and still be exempt.

Same thing applies to Connor, unless they don't sign him by next summer.
Because he's over 20, Jankowski only requires one game played to accrue a professional season.

Connor is either 18 or 19 (depending on what date his age is counted on for determining professional status), so he requires 11 games played for this to count as a pro season (which he can't reach because the Jets only have 7 games remaining).
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline  
Old 03-27-2016, 11:12 AM   #264
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Jankowski is worth more than a second round pick for this team. One of the most complete players coming out of the NCAA who is still only 21 years old is worth more than a pick that will be another 4-5 years away from potentially making the NHL. Not sure why posters don't see this, Jankowski is our top forward prospect.
cannon7 is offline  
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to cannon7 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-27-2016, 11:12 AM   #265
JJ1532
First Line Centre
 
JJ1532's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

I know everyone is focused on Jankowski, but whats the crack with Gilmour? And Hickey for that matter? Are those 2 going to get ELCs come the summer? Will we look to get them into the system?
JJ1532 is offline  
Old 03-27-2016, 11:18 AM   #266
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Hickey is likely going back for his Junior season.

Flames have probably also offered Gilmour a contract.
sureLoss is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 03-27-2016, 11:19 AM   #267
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ1532 View Post
I know everyone is focused on Jankowski, but whats the crack with Gilmour? And Hickey for that matter? Are those 2 going to get ELCs come the summer? Will we look to get them into the system?
I hope Gilmour gets an offer this summer, he does have less leverage IMO and is a defenseman so I think he signs an ATO to play in Stockton and a contract beginning next season. I would really like Gilmour in the fold, I think he is an underrated prospect.

Hickey I think should spend another year at BU, we already have potentially 3 rookie defensemen heading to Stockton.
Alberta_Beef is offline  
Old 03-27-2016, 11:19 AM   #268
Mass_nerder
Franchise Player
 
Mass_nerder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
Exp:
Default

I would hope they sign Gilmore, but I think Hickey can play at BU for two more years, so they might want him to stay at college.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype View Post
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
Mass_nerder is offline  
Old 03-27-2016, 11:27 AM   #269
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Gilmour and Tom Parisi have both been solid, reliable defencemen for the last four years at Providence. Gilmour had slightly better offensive numbers than Parisi.

Parisi was just signed by the Habs to an ELC that kicks in next season, and he'll play out the rest of the year on an ATO in St John's.


I expect the Flames will offer the same deal to Gilmour.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline  
Old 03-27-2016, 11:56 AM   #270
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
The purpose of NHLe is to project the numbers of points a player could expect next year.
No. That's the definition of NHLe. It can be used more broadly. For example, one might look for players with similar NHLes for a given year (i.e. draft, draft+1, draft+2) and see how their careers have turned out.
SebC is offline  
Old 03-27-2016, 12:36 PM   #271
PugnaciousIntern
First Line Centre
 
PugnaciousIntern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
No. That's the definition of NHLe. It can be used more broadly. For example, one might look for players with similar NHLes for a given year (i.e. draft, draft+1, draft+2) and see how their careers have turned out.
Not quite the 'definition', but close. It's just using historical data and applying it to players. Nothing about projections in the definition. I'd agree that projection is its primary use (although it can be used for other reasons as you explained).
PugnaciousIntern is offline  
Old 03-27-2016, 12:40 PM   #272
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
Jankowski is worth more than a second round pick for this team. One of the most complete players coming out of the NCAA who is still only 21 years old is worth more than a pick that will be another 4-5 years away from potentially making the NHL. Not sure why posters don't see this, Jankowski is our top forward prospect.
I'm not sure I've read anyone's post suggesting Flames would be better off not signing him. Where are you getting this idea?

I do think his value right now is about a 2nd round pick, which is very different.
Strange Brew is offline  
Old 03-27-2016, 01:14 PM   #273
Hackey
Franchise Player
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Can someone give a quick run through on whats going on with this situation? Someone went to meet him? He's still deciding? Any hints at likely outcome? Thank you in advance.
Hackey is offline  
Old 03-27-2016, 01:16 PM   #274
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
Can someone give a quick run through on whats going on with this situation? Someone went to meet him? He's still deciding? Any hints at likely outcome? Thank you in advance.
Offer has been made, decision should be made by tomorrow.
dammage79 is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-27-2016, 01:16 PM   #275
Bandwagon In Flames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
Exp:
Default

Another thing to consider in regards to signing Hickey is that he or other rookies can go down to the ECHL team which the Flames also control. I think Hickey is physically ready for the ECHL and probably doesn't see himself finishing school anyways. Didn't look out of place on the World Junior team and by all means has a solid defensive game with his "Brodie-like mobility".
Bandwagon In Flames is offline  
Old 03-27-2016, 01:17 PM   #276
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
Can someone give a quick run through on whats going on with this situation? Someone went to meet him? He's still deciding? Any hints at likely outcome? Thank you in advance.
From the sounds of it Pascall lead the group that presented him a contract yesterday. Jankowski will make his decision today or tomorrow. All signs point to him signing with the Flames according to any local articles that have been written.
Vinny01 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-27-2016, 01:20 PM   #277
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Unless he is insisting on going to one team a la Erixon I'm sure they'll be able to get something a better than 51st pick for him... it's not exactly a deep year for NCAA free agents and teams weak on centre depth in the pipeline would probably see a guy like this ready to step into their system and begin learning, with 4 years of development time behind him, as way more valuable than a 30-40th pick which historically has really low odds of panning out.

If he gets traded and the other team doesn't sign him, does that compensation pick disappear? Or does the other team get it?
Matty81 is offline  
Old 03-27-2016, 01:25 PM   #278
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81 View Post
Unless he is insisting on going to one team a la Erixon I'm sure they'll be able to get something a better than 51st pick for him... it's not exactly a deep year for NCAA free agents and teams weak on centre depth in the pipeline would probably see a guy like this ready to step into their system and begin learning, with 4 years of development time behind him, as way more valuable than a 30-40th pick which historically has really low odds of panning out.

If he gets traded and the other team doesn't sign him, does that compensation pick disappear? Or does the other team get it?
The compensation pick transfers to the other team.

There is really no incentive for a team to trade for him, unless they want to dress him right away and put him in the lineup to help in the playoffs (which by all accounts he is not ready for).

The only reason the Rangers traded for Erixon is that if he wasn't signed before June 1st, he would go back to draft. Then the Rangers would have to pray and hope another team wouldn't draft him before they got an opportunity to.

Jankowski becomes an UFA. If there is only 1 team he wants to go to, all they have to do is wait and get him for free on August 15.

I suppose you could make an argument that someone may want to trade for his rights, but historically no one gives up a 2nd round pick+ for the rights to a pending UFA.

Last edited by sureLoss; 03-27-2016 at 01:31 PM.
sureLoss is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 03-27-2016, 01:39 PM   #279
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

I agree if he has his mind made up that he is going to sign with one specific team there's no point in a trade. But if it's still wide open and say, he wants to go to a team with less depth up the middle, I see lots of incentive to make that trade.

Take a team like Carolina for example they have terrible centre depth in the NHL and no blue chip centre prospects. Let's say they aren't Jankowski's only choice, but are a team he'd consider going to.

Their 2nd rounder would be 41st today. They flip it to Calgary for a 5 month negiotiating window, which they have a good chance of being successful during... and if they fail, they get the 51st overall pick. It's not a huge gamble with lots of upside.

But like I said, it only works if he's not Tim Erixon and specifically wants to sign for a team like the Leafs close to where he's from or something.

I think it's moot anyway and he'll sign. But I am starting to wonder what he's waiting for... or maybe he's still sick.
Matty81 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Matty81 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-27-2016, 01:49 PM   #280
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81 View Post
I agree if he has his mind made up that he is going to sign with one specific team there's no point in a trade. But if it's still wide open and say, he wants to go to a team with less depth up the middle, I see lots of incentive to make that trade.

Take a team like Carolina for example they have terrible centre depth in the NHL and no blue chip centre prospects. Let's say they aren't Jankowski's only choice, but are a team he'd consider going to.

Their 2nd rounder would be 41st today. They flip it to Calgary for a 5 month negiotiating window, which they have a good chance of being successful during... and if they fail, they get the 51st overall pick. It's not a huge gamble with lots of upside.

But like I said, it only works if he's not Tim Erixon and specifically wants to sign for a team like the Leafs close to where he's from or something.

I think it's moot anyway and he'll sign. But I am starting to wonder what he's waiting for... or maybe he's still sick.
Would Carolina risk losing the 41st overall pick in 2016 for the 51st OA pick in 2017? Cause that is the actuality of the compensation pick. They would lose a year of prospect development time, not only dropping down 10 spots.

Chicago wasn't able to trade the rights of Hayes for anything better than the compensation pick and there were multiple teams rumored he was considering.

The thing is once a player decides to wait it out, they will most likely just wait until all offers are in front of them.

Last edited by sureLoss; 03-27-2016 at 01:51 PM.
sureLoss is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy