Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which would you prefer?
Signing Jankowski 315 94.03%
Taking the compensation (51st pick in the 2017 draft) 20 5.97%
Voters: 335. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-26-2016, 09:20 AM   #81
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamescuprun2018 View Post

I presume Mark was injured this past week limiting his icetime in recent overtime games.
It has already been confirmed that Jankowski was injured last night. He missed most of the 1st OT, then was announced wouldn't be returning to the game for the 2nd. Lambert is a hack.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle View Post
How does it work? Can we sign him to a contract that doesn't start until next year. Is Janko really at the point in his development that we would burn a year of him as a pro at this point, or is it something we will likely have to do to ensure we can sign him? Just seems strange to burn a year on a player unless we think he's going to be ready to play NHL level next year?
Yes they can sign him to a contract that starts next season, but so can every other team on August 15. He has the leverage that other teams will sign him.

The Flames have set a precedent in burning years off ELCs off college prospects. Gaudreau, Arnold, Agostino, Hanowski, Gilies, Van Brabant all have had their 1st year of their ELCs burned in the past 3 years.

Burning a year off is not necessarily a bad thing either even for marginal prospects. Ends their contract sooner and enables the organization to move on if they want to and frees up a contract spot for someone else.
sureLoss is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 09:20 AM   #82
Gaskal
Franchise Player
 
Gaskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle View Post
How does it work? Can we sign him to a contract that doesn't start until next year. Is Janko really at the point in his development that we would burn a year of him as a pro at this point, or is it something we will likely have to do to ensure we can sign him? Just seems strange to burn a year on a player unless we think he's going to be ready to play NHL level next year?
We could get him to sign a professional contract that starts accruing next season, and sign a tryout to get some professional games in. I believe that's what we did to Kenny Morrison. It saves one year of ELC. Whereas if we signed him to his ELC right away and had him play a game, it'll burn 1 year off.

For what it's worth though I think we take the Johnny route and give him an NHL game or two.
__________________
Until the Flames make the Western Finals again, this signature shall remain frozen.
Gaskal is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 09:23 AM   #83
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamescuprun2018 View Post
Source: http://www.matchsticksandgasoline.co...mark-jankowski

Interesting perspective not to sign Jankowski.

The 4 year progression of Jankowski would suggest otherwise especially considering his young age as a 4 year college player. His birthdate made him eligible for the 2011 draft by mere days (Sept 15th was the cutoff). (DOB: September 13, 1994)


I presume Mark was injured this past week limiting his icetime in recent overtime games.
If Ryan Lambert is your eye test, you're in trouble.
MrMastodonFarm is offline  
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 09:27 AM   #84
OzSome
Franchise Player
 
OzSome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamescuprun2018 View Post
Source: http://www.matchsticksandgasoline.co...mark-jankowski

Interesting perspective not to sign Jankowski.

The 4 year progression of Jankowski would suggest otherwise especially considering his young age as a 4 year college player. His birthdate made him eligible for the 2011 draft by mere days (Sept 15th was the cutoff). (DOB: September 13, 1994)


I presume Mark was injured this past week limiting his icetime in recent overtime games.
Yep and Gaudreau is way too small to play in the NHL. My point is this guy is so negative and that is because Jankowski did not a point per game until his senior year doesn't make him a bust and Flames shouldn't sign him. He even mentioned he is not a top 6 forwards. Duh, i think the Flames know that. He is going to be a two-way centreman who is slotted for 3rd or 4th line. I think it is a bonus if he can play as a 4th line centre and his line can contribute on both sides of the ice. Maybe if he plays in the NHL next season he can play alongside an energy and also a two-way player Garnet Hathaway. I still think the Flames will make him play his first pro season in Stockton next season.
OzSome is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 09:33 AM   #85
Flamescuprun2018
Scoring Winger
 
Flamescuprun2018's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
If Ryan Lambert is your eye test, you're in trouble.
Will always consider contrarian perspectives.

But agree, illogical to not sign him. Little to lose with a 2 year ELC.

Looked great in summer development camp. 200 foot player that should become a 3C or 4C worst case scenario.
Flamescuprun2018 is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 09:33 AM   #86
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamescuprun2018 View Post
Source: http://www.matchsticksandgasoline.co...mark-jankowski

Interesting perspective not to sign Jankowski.

The 4 year progression of Jankowski would suggest otherwise especially considering his young age as a 4 year college player. His birthdate made him eligible for the 2011 draft by mere days (Sept 15th was the cutoff). (DOB: September 13, 1994)


I presume Mark was injured this past week limiting his icetime in recent overtime games.
Brutal article. Basically his only point was NHLe.
Enoch Root is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 09:36 AM   #87
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OzSome View Post
Yep and Gaudreau is way too small to play in the NHL. My point is this guy is so negative and that is because Jankowski did not a point per game until his senior year doesn't make him a bust and Flames shouldn't sign him. He even mentioned he is not a top 6 forwards. Duh, i think the Flames know that. He is going to be a two-way centreman who is slotted for 3rd or 4th line. I think it is a bonus if he can play as a 4th line centre and his line can contribute on both sides of the ice. Maybe if he plays in the NHL next season he can play alongside an energy and also a two-way player Garnet Hathaway. I still think the Flames will make him play his first pro season in Stockton next season.
Yet he suggests letting him walk in order to acquire a 51st overall pick which has less than a 10% chance of becoming a top 6 forward (4 or 5 years form now).
Enoch Root is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 09:37 AM   #88
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamescuprun2018 View Post
Source: http://www.matchsticksandgasoline.co...mark-jankowski

Interesting perspective not to sign Jankowski.

The 4 year progression of Jankowski would suggest otherwise especially considering his young age as a 4 year college player. His birthdate made him eligible for the 2011 draft by mere days (Sept 15th was the cutoff). (DOB: September 13, 1994)


I presume Mark was injured this past week limiting his icetime in recent overtime games.
An interesting perspective?
Quote:
If Mark Jankowski couldn't outperform Joe Colborne in college, his fate is written.
combine that bit of brilliance with
Quote:
Lambert is widely renowned for his snark and his negativity, but he sees a whole lot of Jankowski. He's tracked him since he joined Providence. There are very few who will tell you otherwise (Ryan just tells it the best).
The only interesting is that someone so stupid actually convinced someone to publish this drivel and this moron actually believes Lambert has watched a hockey game in his life let alone closely followed a prospect.
Alberta_Beef is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 09:44 AM   #89
Cheerio
#1 Goaltender
 
Cheerio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef View Post
The only interesting is that someone so stupid actually convinced someone to publish this drivel and this moron actually believes Lambert has watched a hockey game in his life let alone closely followed a prospect.
Hate his opinions all you want but Ryan Lambert has watched and tracked more college hockey games than anyone on this board. He has seen quite a bit of Providence due to him living in Boston and most of Hockey East playing around Boston
Cheerio is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 09:48 AM   #90
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerio View Post
Hate his opinions all you want but Ryan Lambert has watched and tracked more college hockey games than anyone on this board. He has seen quite a bit of Providence due to him living in Boston and most of Hockey East playing around Boston
Have you read anything by Lambert? There is nothing that can be said to convince me that idiot does anything but scour stat sheets.
Alberta_Beef is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 09:49 AM   #91
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerio View Post
Hate his opinions all you want but Ryan Lambert has watched and tracked more college hockey games than anyone on this board. He has seen quite a bit of Providence due to him living in Boston and most of Hockey East playing around Boston
Then he shouldn't say something like this, which isn't an opinion, it's just wrong.
Quote:
coaches don't trust him in high-leverage situations
If Ryan Lambert had watched more than just last nights game he would know that's totally incorrect. It's nice that he's watched more College games than anyone here but it still doesn't make him anything more than a complete moron.

Craig MacTavish has coached and General Managed more then anyone here too, he's still bad at it.
MrMastodonFarm is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 09:56 AM   #92
Incogneto
#1 Goaltender
 
Incogneto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary - Transplanted Manitoban
Exp:
Default

Did he mention in that article that we only get the 51st pick if we OFFER him a contract, and he declines it? if no contract is offered, no pick is given.
Incogneto is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Incogneto For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 09:57 AM   #93
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Yup, if Lambert thinks the coach doesn't trust Jankowski in key situations, then he either never watches Providence, or he has absolutely no idea what he's looking at.

Never mind that Leaman explicitly states over and over that Jankowski is his go-to guy in most key situations, but anyone who watches a few games would see that for themselves quite quickly.

Either Lambert is trolling (as usual), or he has only watched them recently. With Jankowski's injury, he hardly played in the last couple games.
Enoch Root is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 10:01 AM   #94
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Only have one word for that article.

Idiotic.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 10:02 AM   #95
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheerio View Post
Hate his opinions all you want but Ryan Lambert has watched and tracked more college hockey games than anyone on this board. He has seen quite a bit of Providence due to him living in Boston and most of Hockey East playing around Boston

Luckily, the thread is playing out...

soon we'll all be able to see whether Jankowski was worth the slot he was picked in...

for the sake of the flames, i hope he pans out...
oldschoolcalgary is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 10:06 AM   #96
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

On Jankowskis injury, anyone know what's up? He looked pretty uninspired yesterday, didn't know he was playing hurt
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 10:07 AM   #97
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
On Jankowskis injury, anyone know what's up? He looked pretty uninspired yesterday, didn't know he was playing hurt
he seemed slower and more stiff than usual, maybe an abdominal or groin injury?
Alberta_Beef is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 10:10 AM   #98
druetetective
Crash and Bang Winger
 
druetetective's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Windsor
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Instead, we'll turn to NHLe, a stat I particularly favour. Based on historical trends, most major leagues in the world (especially those that send players into the NHL) are set to the NHL's standard. For example, the NHLe translation factor for the KHL is 0.83, basically saying that a point scored in the KHL is 83% easier than a point scored in the NHL.
Is that really how NHLE works?
I'm one of Jankowski's bigger critics, and that article was trash.
druetetective is offline  
Old 03-26-2016, 10:10 AM   #99
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I think he gets signed here today or tomorrow. He can play guaranteed NHL games and put some money in his pocket. Unless there has been some tampering and Weisbroad has reached out and promised him a shot with the Sedins next year I don't think there is anything to worry about
Vinny01 is online now  
Old 03-26-2016, 10:19 AM   #100
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamescuprun2018 View Post
Matchsticks & Gasoline has hired ricardodw?
GranteedEV is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy